红火树 RedFireTree
Hindustan Times
comments
Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "PM Modi unveils G20 logo with Lotus, Hindi text and 'one world, one family' message | Details" video.
3
@madmax9538 the core of Modi's ideology is Hinduism, from beginning, he devoted whole of his life for promoting and practicing Hinduism, for him, under the most uneducated population, with this fake "democracy" in India, he succeed in got him elected, however, populist never mean correct. Hinduism never worked for India, otherwise India would not have been ruled for thousand of years by all kinds of foreign intruders, for modern country, it should be run based on science and logic, and reasoning in it, however there are none of these in Hinduism. 75 years practice and 8 years under BJP also showed, it will never work. Modi tried to use Hinduism to unify the whole country consists of 563 "princeful states" or tribes, and promoting Hinduism into the extreme form, Hindtva, by doing this, it will make Hindus hate more on Muslims, Modi maybe able to unify in a degree some stats but during the process he creating 200 million Muslims as the enemy, so he is unifying some parts of the country but slitting others. This will never have a good ending,
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Thousand years of India history (if you can call it history) has already proven Hinduism never worked, with, as Indian claimed, more than 5000 years or longer Hinduism, why India was the most invaded and conquered by all kind of foreign intruders for the past thousand of years?? so called "history" of India was merely the history of all these foreign intruders, Persians, Turks, Monguls...........etc etc,.............British, ........... established their rule in this piece of land called India, with people lived worship of 200 million Hindu gods but with no resistance and no change for all the years.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Modi's Hinduism will not work for India, Modi's capitalism will not work either, t would not work in the US or UK how can it work in India? Adani had $8 billion in 2014, now he has $137 billion, but Indian average income is still $2500. Hinduism + capitalism = dead end.
capitalists only care about money, not the country, Modi thought if he let them make huge amount of money they would build more factories and hire more Indians to work however, the fact is not so, US capitalist just freely moved out to China to make money for themselves, not for US, Ambanis and Adanis will do the same, just they do not have a good place to go yet. they will jump out of India at the first opportunity if money calls from outside India.
because Modi is working for them, not for the majority of Indians, tell me, did Ambani or Adani give you a rupee?? Why are you so proud of them?? why is your India hunger index 107, even with Ambani and Adani the richest in Asia?? Is the huge wealth gap between rich and poor a good thing for India??
that is exactly my point, this kind capitalism will not work, not only in India it will not work anywhere in the world in the long run, and cannot compete with other countries, you have the richest Ambani and Adani in Asia, but you do not have any products (spices not counted) in the world market.
Due to Modi only working for Ambanis and Adanis and Tata and sons, in the name of protecting Indian industry , and with very strict rules to foreign companies, foreign companies are leaving, such as GM motor, Ford motor, Musk won't even set up a factory in India despite India's repeated invitation. foreign direct investment in Asia all got rapid growth, only in India dropped 30%. "FDI flows to India drop 30% in 2021: UNCTAD
let's see how Ambanis contributed to India "Prime Minister Modi launched the Make in India programme in 2014 with great fanfare. The programme has three key objectives: 1) increasing manufacturing growth to 12-14%, 2) increasing the share of manufacturing in GDP from 16 to 25% by 2022, and 3) creating 10 crore jobs in manufacturing by 2022.
The manufacturing growth rate has averaged 6% over the last eight years, the share of manufacturing in the GDP has stagnated at 16%, and manufacturing jobs have been reduced by half."
1
1
1