Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "NationalDefence"
channel.
-
8
-
6
-
3
-
Rupam Sarkar
yes, read the history first, those are your excuses?? so tell me, why Hinduism cannot unite the whole India if majority of people live in the India proper believe in it? if Buddhism is so good, why majority of Indians would not accept it?? but more intelligent people welcomed it??
Indians can never realize or will never want to realize, the problem is their Hinduism
Hinduism covers everything, explains everything, but cannot solve anything in real life, only give them temporary spiritual relief, Hinduism is spiritual opium for India.
with Hinduism:
1. Indian people cannot resist numerus and continued invasions from all kinds of intruders through out the history for thousands of years. this made India has no history, or history that we know of. what India has was just waves after waves of foreign rulers rule on this non-resistance and non-change land.
2. India has no progress in science and technology compare to what achieved to their ancestors, they lag behind in the world in education and in science
3. this let India also slow in economical development, in 1947, India had the similar GDP with China, now India's GDP is only 1/5 of China's
4. Hinduism cannot help India to make world class advanced weapons.
5. Hinduism did not help India to lift 330 million people from poverty line, and made India to have world largest slums.
6. Hinduism did not help India to win any war as shown in 1962 to China, in it India army armed with Hinduism suffered 4000 causalities and 4000 surrendered to PLA
in summary:
Seeking truth from facts, not from Hinduism should be the way for India and for all the people.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Kartik G.
thank you
democracy will not work
very simple:
1.in any society the intelligence distribution is a normal distribution, that means, the smartest are few and very stupid are few, most people are not very smart nor stupid, however, due the the nature of majority role of democracy, the society actually voted for those not very smart nor stupid, this would be good in a society with very high level of education and culture development, but not so good for a country with huge poverty population. therefore the most intelligent people are not elected in power in this kind society. India got huge amount of people living under poverty line (330 million) and with very high illiterate rate.
2nd, due to the term limitation of each government, it is very difficult for the government to make long term goals and realize them, each government is short sighted
3rd, the back of this "majority" role is actually extreme individualism, people vote for his/her own interest, not really for the country or the society,
2
-
monuked
it will be interesting to see what your hardened killing machine can do just assume a war situation:
China has placed long range rocket artillery in doklam, PH03, with range over 140 km, Siliguri is about 80 km away, China start by firing the 33 army positions and cut off chicken net corridor, what Indian army can do about it??
1. you do not have that long range artillery
2. very difficult for your soldiers to attack China's position since it is high up in the maintain
3. you do not have enough short range missiles, since China has more missiles
4. your airforce is not as good as China both in quantity and in quality
5. all the airport 500 km from doklam will be destroyed by China's missiles
6. any India jet fighter getting closer to doklam will be shot down since the most advanced jet in IAF is just su-30 mki, no match to China's J20, J10 J16 su35, J11,
7.do you want to join your hardened killing machine and be killed for your glory in the Himalaya maintains??
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sumit Sharma yeah, grow up from it, 50 yrs ago, China and India got about same GDP, now China's GDP is 5 times of India's.
your tiny pity nuclear power is nothing, your best agni V is only DF-4 's level which China put into service in 1970
China has mid course anti ballistic missile capability, your missile needs to fly over 3000 km to reach inner China, while New Deli in only 384 km from China border so if you dare, before you realize, your capital will vanish from the face of the earth.so do not try anything stupid,for your good.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
गुमनाम व्यक्ति
India's Solution To Drug Costs: Ignore Patents And Control Prices - Except For Home Grown Drugs
John LaMattina
John LaMattina
Contributor
i
Pharma & Healthcare
I cover news on drugs and R&D in the pharma industry
Drug pricing is a major issue in India. The Indian government believes that the prices of lifesaving drugs shouldn’t be set by market forces. In a country where very few people have health insurance, 70% of Indians pay for healthcare expenses out of their own pockets. When it comes to cancer drugs, the problem is even more acute. There is no way that people in India can pay even a fraction of the cost for drugs that can be priced at $50,000/year in the West.
This issue was again in the news last week when the Indian Supreme Court denied a patent application for Glivec (also known as Gleevec), an important treatment for leukemia made by Novartis. (Derek Lowe has done a great job in explaining the nuances of this patent decision, which won’t be repeated here.) Given that there is no patent for Glivec in India, any generic drug manufacturer in India can now make and sell this drug, which will be priced at a fraction of what Novartis charges in the rest of the world. This is good for the company that will profit from usurping all of the R&D that Novartis put into the discovery and development of Glivec. It is also good for patients who couldn’t afford Glivec. However, it must be noted that Novartis provides Glivec free of charge to 16,000 patients in India, roughly 95% of those who need it via the Novartis “Glivec International Patient Assistance Program”. The remaining 5% are either reimbursed, insured, or participate in a very generous co-pay program. Thus, not granting a patent for Glivec really hasn’t prevented patients from getting this life-saving medication.
The Glivec situation is not unique. India has granted compulsory licenses to other cancer drugs, including Bayer’s Nexavar, Roche’s Tarceva, and Pfizer’s Sutent. These licenses allow India generic drug manufacturers to make these drugs with impunity. These actions have been justified by the secretary of India’s Pharmaceuticals department in the following way: “We need to ensure that expensive drugs are available at affordable rates to the poor.” It is hard to argue with that philosophy. However, India is expanding this policy beyond expensive cancer drugs. Again, just this past week, the Indian Supreme Court refused to prevent an Indian generic manufacturer, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, from manufacturing and selling Merck’s diabetes drug, Januvia, in India. Merck will likely appeal this decision. While it is an important drug, Januvia does not carry an expensive price tag. In fact, when it was launched in India, Merck charged $0.86/tablet, one-fifth the US cost. Nevertheless, despite recognizing the need to make Januvia affordable in India, Merck’s intellectual property for this drug will be ignored in this country for the foreseeable future.
In addition to not granting patents for new drugs, the Indian government sets prices for drugs that are patented, but this is not just for expensive medications. There are now 348 drugs that have price caps. However, India has now introduced a new element to this policy. Drugs that have some form of innovation that can be attributed to Indian researchers can be IMMUNE from price controls for five years. Three types of innovation can qualify for this benefit:
1) drugs that arise from indigenous R&D;
2) improvements by an Indian company on a process for making an existing drug;
3) development of a new drug delivery system by Indian R&D.
The rationale for this policy was explained by a government official: “This would spur innovation and make sure price-control regime doesn’t dissuade pharma firms from research and development”. You can also envision that these new rules could be used by Indian generic companies to circumvent pharmaceutical company patents . For example, what is to stop an Indian company from developing a new process for making an important new drug developed by a non-Indian pharma company? It would not be surprising for the Indian government to allow a patent on this process and again the innovative company would be out of luck in protecting their commercial rights for this medicine in India.
1
-
I really worried about India, something fundamentally wrong. When you make this kind plan, you are planing to acquire the weapons to match against for the future enemy's threat, not for now. however, all the planed weapons are not even match up to what your enemy has today. none of them are the most advanced weapon today, none of them has any stealthy capability and none of them are 5 th. gen. fighters. Game changer?? just a joke, none of them is.
Indian's like to just say that they think is good, however, you need to compare in technical details, not just based on what you believe or think
for jet fighters, you need to compare
1. engine (J20 uses WS-15, with max power about 197 kn, to check Rafale engine, less than 100 kn)
2. radar (J20's radar with about 1970-2200 T/R, Rafale, 850. )
3. RCS （J20, 0.001 and less, Rafale? 0.5)
4. range (for this we only compare internal fuel capacity, J20, 25 tons, Rafale? 4.8 tons)
5. weapon (J20 can use PL12, with 120 km range, and PL 15 with over 300 km range, Rafale?? meteor? 120 km)
tell me, why Rafale is so good, 36 of them are facing over 1000 3rd gen. and above Chinese fighters, how can them be a game changer or change anything??
36 Rafale with $240 M each will cost India people $8640 million or $8.6 billion, OK, then China need to match up this threat from India, let's say make more J20 which cost $110 M each, with the same amount of money, China will make 72 J20s, wait, since China's military budget is 3 times of India's therefore, with the same ratio and no more burden for China, China will make over 216 J20s for India's 36 Rafale, without extra efforts for China.
in conclusion: India is spending so much time and money and efforts for things will not work and useless in future.
1
-
1
-
1
-
totally useless,
in ancient time it did not help India in defend itself against any invaders
in current time, it did not help India to develop rapidly, it did not help India to realize make in India dream, it did not help India to catch up with China, so India's GDP is only 1/5 of China's
it did not help 330 million people living under the poverty line and living in the world largest slums.
the problem of it is it totally lacks scientific thinking but full of wishful thinking, it explains everything but cannot change anything, it covers everything but just has no logic.
without this kind "universal" awareness, in other parts of the world, people made more contributions for the entire human being to get better understanding of the world and the universe, made more contributions for the whole world civilization and made the whole world people living a better life than those in India. isnt this a fact?
seek truth from facts, not seek truth from religion or believing is the true way of awareness,
wake up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
do anyone hear any technical experts in the US talked about design of F22 before it was made??do anyone hear any technical experts in China talked about the design of J20 before it was made??
do Indians even understand what top secret means?? if you openly talk about it, is it still a top secret??
I simply put engine data here, you will see that this AMCA will not be very advanced based on the fact that India cannot make advanced jet engine:
simple compare, no need to talk too much, data will show and prove, when India is criticizing China, look what they have??:
let take the data from this video:
WS-15
max thrust: 30,000lbs
after burner : 40,000 lbs
OK
India's dream "indigenous make " Kaveri K-10
Maximum thrust:
Military thrust (throttled): 52 kN (11,687 lbf)
Full afterburner: 81 kN (18,210 lbf) (planned to be refined to >95 kN)
see the difference? and it is not even working, India even cannot make this engine yet.
what Tejas is using now is GE F404
Maximum thrust:
11,000 lbf (48.9 kN) military thrust
17,700 lbf (78.7 kN) with afterburner
can you see the data??
OK, India will use GE f 414 for its Tejas MK2, suppose to start in 2022,
Maximum thrust:
13,000 lbf (57.8 kN) military thrust
22,000 lbf (97.9 kN) with afterburner
tell me , anyone of them even close to the performance of WS-15???
good for India to have a top secret project leader like him, everyone can take it easy and go to a long sleep, when wake up in 2060, he is died someone replaced him still talking.
1
-
1
-
Ninad Bhave
you have a strange logic, here we discussing AMCA, not LCA, your plan is to use GF F414 for it, that is I mentioned WS-15, I know your LCA is using GE F404. Your AMCA is suppose to counter balance China's J20, not just for national pride, although almost nothing to be proud of as the reasons I have pointed out, always too late and not useful.
as for your ISRO, the same, it only for yourself, compare to China, your space program is also far behind China's, your rocket capability:
LEO 14 tons
GTO 4 tons
compare to China's
LEO 25 tons
GTO 14 tons
India media reported in 2009, saying that India would send a man to space in 2015 and walk on the moon by 2020, what a joke.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
For Chinese army led by CCP, since CCP 's aim is perfect match with Chinese army 's goal, that is protect China from any invasions (as India did in 1962) and liberate any illegally occupied land (such as Tibet South).
Tibet is a part China, this is the stand of Indian government.
also, Indian do not see the real thing, they just believe whatever their old masters told them, what western style democracy give India?? nothing, just a piece of paper.
China's political system, with very important part of it, was adopted from long history of China political tradition, since India had no history, therefore very difficult for Indians to understand it. only you have to admit that China has a stronger economy and a shining country.
1
-
1
-
Rupam Sarkar
let talk about little bit more about the army,
Chinese army was established in 1927 as red army, took them continuously fight for 21 yrs to defeated 8 million GMD army armed with US weapon to win the war and set up the PRC, then immediately went to Korean to face US led UN armies, this war, for the first time, China PLAAF joined the fight in the air and shot down many US jet fighters, then in 1962, defeated Indian army, in 1969, fight in border war with Soviet Union's army, and protected a small piece of land for China (later signed treaty to let China keep it), in 1972, fought war in the sea for Parcel islands and won, and in 1979, invaded Vietnam the casualty ration is 25000 vs Vietnam's 300,000 (sorry, vietnam militia included) and later the war continued for 10 yrs, China now hold all the territory it claimed and fought for.
from these you can see that Chinese army never lose a war and gained very rich experiences, tell me, what is your army's experiences?
India is lucky, since China never really treats India as her enemy, however, you may have it as you wish.
1
-
1
-
Rupam Sarkar
I totally understand Hinduism is not a religion, it is a mixture of culture, legends, ferry tales, traditions, habit, fortune telling.......................................a mixture of everything for the people lived or living in the India proper.
the problem for it is that it lacks essential things for modern world: scientific thinking and logic, these 2 things are the key for a modern world.
while, for Indians, due to Hinduism (or partly), they are full of wishful thinking and dreaming.
Einstein said, if you cannot explain something in very brief and clear words, that means you do not really understand it.
such as you cannot explain Hinduism briefly and clearly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Harsh raj
nonsense, with Marxism as guide line, China has changed from a poor and backward country into world largest industrialized country, compare to India with Hinduism, China's average income is 5 times more than Indians, more Chinese than Indians have cars, and houses eating better food, compare to 330 million Indians living under poverty line, more Chinese going abroad. China's OBOR now is helping not very developed countries for building their ports, road, railways, to let their country more beautiful and people living better lives.
1
-
1
-
1