Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "Indian Strategist Reveals Top Secret Chinese Threat To India | Patriots Must Watch" video.

  1. there is an English Proverb: " if you cannot beat them, join them". for India, you cannot beat China/Pak, so the logic way is to join OBOR. Buddha said: "endless bitter sea in front, repent the land is nearby. "
    8
  2. very good talk, not like some fools in here just saying "China copy" then buried their heads into sands.
    6
  3. deepB78  then he created Buddhism, do you know why? because he realized Hinduim is not good, and he was the most intelligent man ever lived in India
    3
  4. Rupam Sarkar  yes, read the history first, those are your excuses?? so tell me, why Hinduism cannot unite the whole India if majority of people live in the India proper believe in it? if Buddhism is so good, why majority of Indians would not accept it?? but more intelligent people welcomed it?? Indians can never realize or will never want to realize, the problem is their Hinduism Hinduism covers everything, explains everything, but cannot solve anything in real life, only give them temporary spiritual relief, Hinduism is spiritual opium for India. with Hinduism: 1. Indian people cannot resist numerus and continued invasions from all kinds of intruders through out the history for thousands of years. this made India has no history, or history that we know of. what India has was just waves after waves of foreign rulers rule on this non-resistance and non-change land. 2. India has no progress in science and technology compare to what achieved to their ancestors, they lag behind in the world in education and in science 3. this let India also slow in economical development, in 1947, India had the similar GDP with China, now India's GDP is only 1/5 of China's 4. Hinduism cannot help India to make world class advanced weapons. 5. Hinduism did not help India to lift 330 million people from poverty line, and made India to have world largest slums. 6. Hinduism did not help India to win any war as shown in 1962 to China, in it India army armed with Hinduism suffered 4000 causalities and 4000 surrendered to PLA in summary: Seeking truth from facts, not from Hinduism should be the way for India and for all the people.
    3
  5. Romesh Sharma  wishful thinking, show evidence, your military power if less than 1/5 of China's 2. India is a none-alignment country, there is no military treaty for India to be with any other country, therefore, no other country has any responsibility for it, keeping dreaming others will sacrifice their lives for India, in 1962, who helped you?? nobody.
    2
  6. Samir Samal  you have no prove for it. your power of Hindustan did not prevent India to be occupied by all kinds of the intruders throughout of nearly 2000 yrs.
    2
  7. Samir Samal  that was because your bomb was too teeny tiny. India claimed they have H-bomb, however, the biggest bomb they had is about 45 K t tnt, while it should be at least 200, kt tnt to be qualified as H-bomb, fyi: China's first H-bomb was 3 million tnt, why so secret?? let the world know, what is wrong with? why secrecy is such a big deal?? nobody with normal brain can really understand Indians logic
    2
  8. Kartik G.  thank you democracy will not work very simple: 1.in any society the intelligence distribution is a normal distribution, that means, the smartest are few and very stupid are few, most people are not very smart nor stupid, however, due the the nature of majority role of democracy, the society actually voted for those not very smart nor stupid, this would be good in a society with very high level of education and culture development, but not so good for a country with huge poverty population. therefore the most intelligent people are not elected in power in this kind society. India got huge amount of people living under poverty line (330 million) and with very high illiterate rate. 2nd, due to the term limitation of each government, it is very difficult for the government to make long term goals and realize them, each government is short sighted 3rd, the back of this "majority" role is actually extreme individualism, people vote for his/her own interest, not really for the country or the society,
    2
  9. monuked  it will be interesting to see what your hardened killing machine can do just assume a war situation: China has placed long range rocket artillery in doklam, PH03, with range over 140 km, Siliguri is about 80 km away, China start by firing the 33 army positions and cut off chicken net corridor, what Indian army can do about it?? 1. you do not have that long range artillery 2. very difficult for your soldiers to attack China's position since it is high up in the maintain 3. you do not have enough short range missiles, since China has more missiles 4. your airforce is not as good as China both in quantity and in quality 5. all the airport 500 km from doklam will be destroyed by China's missiles 6. any India jet fighter getting closer to doklam will be shot down since the most advanced jet in IAF is just su-30 mki, no match to China's J20, J10 J16 su35, J11, 7.do you want to join your hardened killing machine and be killed for your glory in the Himalaya maintains??
    2
  10. Dipan Rajkumar  so you mean India should not buy Rafale but just use the money to build more toilets? good idea.
    1
  11. Rashed Belhasa  have you seen The Vostok 2018 – Russia’s largest military exercise in decades which includes Chinese troops?????? 300,000 troops total, China send 3200 hah :)) where is India???
    1
  12. why Indians think USA will help them to fight China?? what India can give USA?? Indians buy weapons from Russia, do not listen to USA for not buying S-400 and then so confident that USA will sacrifice their lives and money for India, why?? is USA India's slave?? hah :)),
    1
  13. Sumit Sharma  we know exactly your capability, that is why we won in 1962, and we will win in future too. your capability is mainly just your big mouth, then nothing else.
    1
  14. Sumit Sharma  yeah, grow up from it, 50 yrs ago, China and India got about same GDP, now China's GDP is 5 times of India's. your tiny pity nuclear power is nothing, your best agni V is only DF-4 's level which China put into service in 1970 China has mid course anti ballistic missile capability, your missile needs to fly over 3000 km to reach inner China, while New Deli in only 384 km from China border so if you dare, before you realize, your capital will vanish from the face of the earth.so do not try anything stupid,for your good.
    1
  15. Bitch Lasagna  do not say never, in 1962, under the "east forward" policy, you sent your army into China's territory, only kicked back by PLA 2nd in 2017, you sent your army into a territory not belong to India and stayed there illegally for over 71 days completely violated international law and brought China and India into the edge of war. 3rd. from the talk about your arm purchase all are mainly for the purpose of fighting China, also your Agni V project directly for threatening China
    1
  16. lakshya videhi  good, democracy, open, what the problem?? that is SA's internal affairs, take it or not, up to them, just as nobody cares if India join BRI or not.
    1
  17. nobody gives a shit if you trust or not
    1
  18. गुमनाम व्यक्ति India's Solution To Drug Costs: Ignore Patents And Control Prices - Except For Home Grown Drugs John LaMattina John LaMattina Contributor i Pharma & Healthcare I cover news on drugs and R&D in the pharma industry Drug pricing is a major issue in India. The Indian government believes that the prices of lifesaving drugs shouldn’t be set by market forces. In a country where very few people have health insurance, 70% of Indians pay for healthcare expenses out of their own pockets. When it comes to cancer drugs, the problem is even more acute. There is no way that people in India can pay even a fraction of the cost for drugs that can be priced at $50,000/year in the West. This issue was again in the news last week when the Indian Supreme Court denied a patent application for Glivec (also known as Gleevec), an important treatment for leukemia made by Novartis. (Derek Lowe has done a great job in explaining the nuances of this patent decision, which won’t be repeated here.) Given that there is no patent for Glivec in India, any generic drug manufacturer in India can now make and sell this drug, which will be priced at a fraction of what Novartis charges in the rest of the world. This is good for the company that will profit from usurping all of the R&D that Novartis put into the discovery and development of Glivec. It is also good for patients who couldn’t afford Glivec. However, it must be noted that Novartis provides Glivec free of charge to 16,000 patients in India, roughly 95% of those who need it via the Novartis “Glivec International Patient Assistance Program”. The remaining 5% are either reimbursed, insured, or participate in a very generous co-pay program. Thus, not granting a patent for Glivec really hasn’t prevented patients from getting this life-saving medication. The Glivec situation is not unique. India has granted compulsory licenses to other cancer drugs, including Bayer’s Nexavar, Roche’s Tarceva, and Pfizer’s Sutent. These licenses allow India generic drug manufacturers to make these drugs with impunity. These actions have been justified by the secretary of India’s Pharmaceuticals department in the following way: “We need to ensure that expensive drugs are available at affordable rates to the poor.” It is hard to argue with that philosophy. However, India is expanding this policy beyond expensive cancer drugs. Again, just this past week, the Indian Supreme Court refused to prevent an Indian generic manufacturer, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, from manufacturing and selling Merck’s diabetes drug, Januvia, in India. Merck will likely appeal this decision. While it is an important drug, Januvia does not carry an expensive price tag. In fact, when it was launched in India, Merck charged $0.86/tablet, one-fifth the US cost. Nevertheless, despite recognizing the need to make Januvia affordable in India, Merck’s intellectual property for this drug will be ignored in this country for the foreseeable future. In addition to not granting patents for new drugs, the Indian government sets prices for drugs that are patented, but this is not just for expensive medications. There are now 348 drugs that have price caps. However, India has now introduced a new element to this policy. Drugs that have some form of innovation that can be attributed to Indian researchers can be IMMUNE from price controls for five years. Three types of innovation can qualify for this benefit: 1) drugs that arise from indigenous R&D; 2) improvements by an Indian company on a process for making an existing drug; 3) development of a new drug delivery system by Indian R&D. The rationale for this policy was explained by a government official: “This would spur innovation and make sure price-control regime doesn’t dissuade pharma firms from research and development”. You can also envision that these new rules could be used by Indian generic companies to circumvent pharmaceutical company patents . For example, what is to stop an Indian company from developing a new process for making an important new drug developed by a non-Indian pharma company? It would not be surprising for the Indian government to allow a patent on this process and again the innovative company would be out of luck in protecting their commercial rights for this medicine in India.
    1
  19. Samir Samal  so scary, hah :)) only with your big mouth.
    1
  20. Honey Badger  haha :)) again, so scary, hah :)) China fought directly against US Army and airforce in Korean war, pushed US led UN force from border of China back 500 km to 38 parallel line. LEMOA?? against China?? hah just a joke
    1
  21. Samir Samal  you may combine all the numbers you want to and I just provide the number in 1962, let's see which one is bigger: In 1962, India army suffered 4000 casualties and 4000 surrendered to China PLA, now your turn.
    1
  22. and in 1962, in India army, one lieutenant general fled away (saved his life) , one brigade general was killed in action and one brigade General got captured by PLA, what a glory.
    1
  23. For Chinese army led by CCP, since CCP 's aim is perfect match with Chinese army 's goal, that is protect China from any invasions (as India did in 1962) and liberate any illegally occupied land (such as Tibet South). Tibet is a part China, this is the stand of Indian government. also, Indian do not see the real thing, they just believe whatever their old masters told them, what western style democracy give India?? nothing, just a piece of paper. China's political system, with very important part of it, was adopted from long history of China political tradition, since India had no history, therefore very difficult for Indians to understand it. only you have to admit that China has a stronger economy and a shining country.
    1
  24. kidney in India in black market is very popular, that is just what I heard.
    1
  25. Rupam Sarkar  let talk about little bit more about the army, Chinese army was established in 1927 as red army, took them continuously fight for 21 yrs to defeated 8 million GMD army armed with US weapon to win the war and set up the PRC, then immediately went to Korean to face US led UN armies, this war, for the first time, China PLAAF joined the fight in the air and shot down many US jet fighters, then in 1962, defeated Indian army, in 1969, fight in border war with Soviet Union's army, and protected a small piece of land for China (later signed treaty to let China keep it), in 1972, fought war in the sea for Parcel islands and won, and in 1979, invaded Vietnam the casualty ration is 25000 vs Vietnam's 300,000 (sorry, vietnam militia included) and later the war continued for 10 yrs, China now hold all the territory it claimed and fought for. from these you can see that Chinese army never lose a war and gained very rich experiences, tell me, what is your army's experiences? India is lucky, since China never really treats India as her enemy, however, you may have it as you wish.
    1
  26. DURGA bora  sorry it is none your business that China and Pakistan are iron brothers and enjoy their friendship very much, nothing India can do about CEPC although INdia hates it to its guts
    1
  27. Rupam Sarkar  I totally understand Hinduism is not a religion, it is a mixture of culture, legends, ferry tales, traditions, habit, fortune telling.......................................a mixture of everything for the people lived or living in the India proper. the problem for it is that it lacks essential things for modern world: scientific thinking and logic, these 2 things are the key for a modern world. while, for Indians, due to Hinduism (or partly), they are full of wishful thinking and dreaming. Einstein said, if you cannot explain something in very brief and clear words, that means you do not really understand it. such as you cannot explain Hinduism briefly and clearly.
    1
  28. Rupam Sarkar  please remember you are under my titled comment, so it is you jumped into my column, I did not go to you, so who bother whom?? I did not invite you to be here to argue with me, did I??
    1
  29. Rupam Sarkar  youtube does not belong to India, do you know that?
    1
  30. Rupam Sarkar  in any case I did not go to you to argue with you and I did not invite you to argue with me
    1
  31. monuked  :)) so stupid. hah :))why don t read "Himalaya blunder" first??
    1
  32. Vikram Gupta  "In 1962 America and USSR were busy at Brazil (Fidel Costro) issue" is this what INdian school taught you?? haha :)) why India need others help?? hah :)) you think your army cannot fight Chinese PLA alone??
    1
  33. monuked  be careful, why you laugh so hard, do not chock to die, for you own good.
    1
  34. Alpesh K  only excuses, read "Himalaya blunder" first before you show your ignorance.
    1
  35. BICCHA RAJA GUHA  just call me: Buddha
    1
  36. tejinder singh  this kind culture cannot create heroism, have you seen "Mulan", it happened in China, but cannot / could not happen in your India "civilization", all the Hinduism told you was to "survive", does not matter who is the ruler, as long as the ruler won't change your way of life, since as an Indian it did not matter to pay tax to which ruler( did not matter how far away this ruler came from and what this ruler did to Indians and India). the most of basic of this phenomena is there was no concept of "nation", "country" in this kind "civilization".
    1
  37. Harsh raj  nonsense, with Marxism as guide line, China has changed from a poor and backward country into world largest industrialized country, compare to India with Hinduism, China's average income is 5 times more than Indians, more Chinese than Indians have cars, and houses eating better food, compare to 330 million Indians living under poverty line, more Chinese going abroad. China's OBOR now is helping not very developed countries for building their ports, road, railways, to let their country more beautiful and people living better lives.
    1
  38. Harsh raj  India and China all actually did not choose ideology from their tradition, after independence of India in 1947, India chose western style political system, China chose Marxism, now history has tell which one is more successful. Chinese people are fortunate that they have chosen a correct path for their country's development and history will also show that China will continue to grow and progress to lead world into a community of shared future for the whole humankind
    1
  39. Harsh raj  do not just listen what you want to, see the reality, most Chinese support Chinese government, CCP has now 90 million members . enjoy your freedom of poverty.
    1
  40. azra bibi  that is just your opinion, Indians are usually confused with what they think and what are the facts.
    1