Comments by "红火树 RedFireTree" (@firetree2007) on "NewsX Live"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nobody can deny Hindu civilization is old, however, old does not mean good. Buddhism is an off branch of Hinduism is also correct, however, Buddhism is a much higher level than Hinduism in religion and philosophy sense, it was too difficult for most Indians to understand it so gradually it abandoned by India itself but developed in east Asian countries, China, JP and south east countries. just as in all other civilization, some of them developed expanded grew, some of them disappeared, since all civilization have good parts in them and bad parts in them. the core of Hindu civilization is just survival. no science in it, no logic in it, no progressive force in it, no change in it. Under it, India society had no history, in whole India, there is not a single history book from ancient India but all fairy tales, imagined stories, dreams, nothing accurate in it. so Indian historians need to read history book from ancient China to learn what real happened in India at the time, such as the travel record by Xuanzang, [ɕɥɛ̌n.tsâŋ] (Chinese: 玄奘 ) when he visited India in Tang dynasty, from 629-645 AD. as Karl Marx said: "Indian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we call its history, is but the history of the successive intruders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society. The question, therefore, is not whether the English had a right to conquer India, but whether we are to prefer India conquered by the Turk, by the Persian, by the Russian, to India conquered by the Briton."
1
-
1
-
1
-
in human civilization, we praise those culture, religion, philosophy for making human kind more intelligent, promote the culture of human development, whether it is old or not, Christianity came much later than Hinduism, however, it contain more advanced ideology and philosophy in it with wisdom, some of teaching from it still guide us and influenced whole history of the human kind civilization development. therefore, for religion, more important is what in it not how old it is .
Compare to Buddhism, even it was developed from Hinduism however Buddhism contains much advanced ideology than Hinduism, for example, unlike Hinduism promoting caste system, make people stay in different caste from their born, Buddhism believes each human is equal, (as stated in US declare of Independence:" everyone is born equal", that but was at least 1700 yrs - 2300 yrs before it, depends using Christianity or Buddhism to compare), Buddha was not God, he did not claim himself was a God, Buddha is a person with rich in knowledge, and Buddha said everyone could reach the status through learning, this was a revolution to the Hinduism's caste, give poor people hope, let them learn to work to fight to change their life, none of this in Hinduism,
of course as all other religion (civilization or culture), some in of them are good and some of them are bad, for today, people should learn good parts of them and do not just accept bad parts of them, not just because it was old, or it originated in your own country, for the past at least 1000 yrs, Hinduism did not protect India from being invaded by all kind of intruders to occupy India, why not India people raise to resist the invasion and foreign rulers?? no such teaching in Hinduism? what India achieved because of Hinduism?? What Hinduism let India contributed more to the human civilization?? and what are they?? even if this civilization did for the history, what about it now? Can Hinduism lead India into 21st century? can Hinduism transform India and to guide India into a modern developed country?? No evidence for that for the past 1000 years.
Hinduism did more harm than good to India throughout the history and today.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DRDO is the most impotent defense institution in the world.
1. arjun tank, failure, and too heavy to put it when it needed most, Ladakh.
2. Tejas, useless, India cannot make Kevari engine work. after 40 yrs, basically it has no use since it will not match to PAF's JF-17 block iii but with price tag at least 2 times more
3. Akash, a copy of Russia's Sam 6, after 30 years, still not good
4. k4, still cannot even be tested in submarine but only in platform, k15's 750 km range is just a joke, who will let your sub get near to that range in war?
5. rifle Insas, poor, so India wants to import AK203
6. Brahmos, already out dated in the time of hyper sonic missile. and not a single one (0) sold to any other country.
7. India home make drones, every single one has crashed somewhere, one of them crashed into China. so India needs to buy/borrow drones from Israel and USA, USA will not sell India drones with attacking capability but only for surveillance purpose, at the same time, China's drones sold to many countries with both surveillance and attacking capabilities
the list goes on and on, due to DRDO's incapability, India needs to import almost all weapons from rifle bullets to jet fighters.
at the same time DRDO wasted huge amount of Indian people hard earned money and make Modi's "Make in India" just an empty slogan
1
-
1
-
Under Modi:
1.Economy: The so-called "fastest-growing economy in the world" bubble has burst, with the growth rate dropping from 8.3% to 6.7%, and projected to fall further to 6.4% next year.
2. Industry: The industrial sector continues to decline. Manufacturing's share of GDP has fallen from 17% before Modi took power to 12.84% today. There’s little hope for industrialization since the global market is already saturated.
3. Employment: Job opportunities are scarce, with only 50% of the working-age population employed. Of those, 50% are family helpers, many of whom work without pay.
4. Consumption: With limited job opportunities, there's little money for consumption. India's consumption growth is only half of its GDP growth, which will inevitably drag down overall economic growth.
5. Social Division: Modi's tenure has deepened divisions between religious and ethnic groups.
6. Foreign Relations: India is increasingly isolated. In 2024, 30 heads of state visited China individually, and 51 out of 53 African nations participated in the Africa-China Summit, with very few bothering to visit India.
7. Military: India faces a widening military technology gap with China, with little chance of closing it.
8. Pollution: Despite its relatively small industrial base (manufacturing is only 1/12th of China’s), India suffers from some of the world’s worst air and water pollution.
In summary, we are grateful to Modi for what he has achieved for China by ruining India so quickly.
1
-
1
-
When Muslims ruled India during the Mughal Empire, India's GDP accounted for 25% of the world's total. However, under British rule, India's GDP dropped from 25% to 3.5%. Now, 78 years after independence, India's GDP still remains at 3.5% of the world's total, with its manufacturing sector accounting for 3.3% of the world. In contrast, the People's Republic of China, which started with a similar GDP of 3.5% of the world around the same time, has now grown to account for 18% of the world's GDP, with its manufacturing sector reaching 29% of the world’s total.
So India should let Muslims to rule the country??
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DeepakSingh-qp8vt
I only said the fact,
India is on a wrong way, especially under BJP, using Hinduism, since Hinduism lack most important things for modern country, Science and concept of logic.
India also has wrong political system, that is your west democracy, and your so proud of "freedom"
all the "freedom" at its back is based on individualism, for a society like India, it is just suicidal. as it has shown in your history since Independence compare to China,
however, for you, for most Indians, you are still so proud of your wrong way of manage a country even it shows it is not working.
1
-
@DeepakSingh-qp8vt
for making a faked "strong" image, India spend huge amount of money buying advanced weapons, however, for education, budge is only 0.5% of its GDP compare to China's 4%, total money difference is China spend 38 time more money in education, compare to India, education is the future of a country, India is a country with no future, 'same for R&D, India budget is only 0.6% of its GDP, compare to China's 2.1 %, about 18 times in real money amount compare to India.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1