Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. 19
  2. 8
  3. 5
  4. 5
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45.  @ssaini5028  Literally everything you wrote is a lie. Not one thing is true. What a sad world you must live in to make up that kind of nonsense. You have verifiable sources to back up your claims? Of course not, you’re lying. Prove me wrong by putting in quotes and name credible sources. You can’t and you know it. Russia couldn’t even stop Wagner group from heading towards Moscow, and Putin had to flee. And you think Russia can beat the U.S.? With just a few thousand troops Ukraine was able to invade the Kursk region, and still Russia today hasn’t been able to remove them. Russia’s army is even using golf carts, scooters and bicycles on the front. Haha hahahaha Russia’s Black Sea fleet has gone into hiding against a country without a navy, and you think Russia can beat the U.S. Navy. Hahaha. Russia’s air force can’t even achieve air superiority over Ukraine’s vintage and small Air Force. Russia doesn’t have a chance against the US. Ukraine wasn’t even a top twenty military force at the start of the war, and Russia is still suffering humiliating losses. The US is Ukraine’s largest donor, and it provides Ukraine with less than 5% of its annual military budget, and much of the equipment is old that is sitting and collecting dust. Nobody respects the Russian military anymore. China’s own military admits that their lack of experience would be hard to overcome to beat the U.S. If China was so sure that it could beat the U.S., it would have invaded Taiwan by now, which is right next to China while the USA would have to travel many thousands of miles/kilometers.
    1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55.  @deanzaZZR  Well, it’s either wrong or you misunderstood it. There are scores of websites that discuss both the land and maritime disputes. Here’s an excerpt from one of them. China has also been involved with several land disputes with its neighbouring countries and recent times have witnessed an escalation of attack by China. India: India and China clashed violently at the Galwan Valley in Eastern Ladakh on 15 June, which is part of the disputed Aksai Chin region. The clash left 20 Indian soldiers dead and several injured. The PLA also reportedly suffered casualties. China has also staked claim on parts of Arunachal Pradesh. Nepal: China has a long-standing dispute over parts of Nepal that it claims are Tibet. In June, China annexed Rui village in Nepal, claiming it as part of Tibet. Bhutan: It also claims to own a large chunk of eastern Bhutan including areas like Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar and Gesur. On 5 July, China stated that it has a border dispute with Bhutan, for the first time since 1986. Laos: The communist country also alleges that it owns large parts of Laos on historical precedent dating back to the Yuan Dynasty. Mongolia: Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region within Mongolia, has also been involved in a territorial dispute with China but the last border flare-up between the two regions was in 2015. Myanmar: China and Myanmar share a 2,185-km-long border based on a 1960 agreement. However, two weeks ago, Myanmar accused China of creating trouble on the border and instigating terror groups. Tibet: Perhaps China’s most decisive land dispute is the one with Tibet. In 1950, China enforced a long-held claim on the Himalayan country and incorporated it with its own territory. Tibet’s spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and his followers were forced to flee to India, where they have set up a government in exile.
    1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80.  @struvrim  If that was the case, they wouldn’t need to use US microchips in the first place. They continue to try to find any holes in the system to obtain them. It’s much more than being about the software and code. Imagine trying to play a modern day video game on a computer that was created thirty years ago. It’s not going to work. The Lancet drone isn’t some high tech drone that is technologically innovative. Look at how drones just as capable are being acquired in the commercial marketplace. Plus it still has many of its components western made, including US made microchips. Russia’s not a technological leader. It never has been. “Lancet drones still rely on components of foreign origin imported to Russia. The first known instance of Russian weapon production using foreign microchips, manufactured after the start of the large-scale invasion, was discovered in a report published by the independent group Conflict Armament Research, which investigates captured Russian weapons on the battlefield. Researchers specifically examined the contents of captured Russian Lancet drones in February and March. As a result, three identical chips produced by an American company at an offshore factory were found. The detection of such chips does not necessarily indicate a violation of export control since the United States had not imposed restrictions on this specific type of chips until September. They could have been manufactured in August and possibly shipped immediately.”
    1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1