Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Artur Rehi"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
@atychon It is a conspiracy theory. There was no genocide, that’s just Russian propaganda bullshit. Show me pictures like what the Serbs did to the Albanians with massive grave sites, there aren’t any in Ukraine, it’s Russia’s lies to invade Ukraine and take territory that doesn’t belong to it. Just like how Russia lied that it didn’t have any troops in Ukraine, only to admit later that it lied that those “little green men” were Russian troops all along. Crimea was gifted to Ukraine, and the fact that Russia paid Ukraine lease money to use the base for all those years confirmed it. And then Russia lied that it didn’t have troops in Eastern Ukraine, only to have its own troops post selfies of themselves there, or to be captured with Russian visas. Russia is the aggressor. If Russia stopped supporting the separatists and removed its troops from the region there would be peace, but instead Russia wants war.
And no, the US did not have a coup. There’s no evidence to support it, just Russia grabbing at straws trying to make it look that way. Russia didn’t like how Ukraine was turning towards the EU so it took matters into its own hands.
All nations should be able to do whatever they want on their territory. Russia has no right to force Ukraine into doing what is only good for Russia. If Ukraine wants to join NATO, that’s its choice, not Russia’s.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ I used to be a contracts officer so I am very familiar with how various legal documents work, including memorandums, contracts, agreements, non disclosure agreements, teaming agreements, procurement contracts, etc. The memorandum itself would need to be explicitly clear to state that the US would defend Ukraine. It would not be done by reference to an old document, especially something of that magnitude. There’s nothing of the sort. Regardless, let’s say that the President did sign the memorandum stating that the U.S. must defend Ukraine. It wouldn’t have any legal weight because he doesn’t have the authority to grant that kind of protection on his own. It would take Congress to authorize it, as well. And furthermore, if you really knew what you were talking about you’d also know that the Helsinki Accords were non- binding since each country’s parliaments/Congress would need to approve of them. Facts are the US never would have agreed to protect Ukraine in the 90s when Ukraine wasn’t even an ally. In addition, Russia was going to take the nukes with them whether Ukraine liked it or not. Ukraine didn’t even want them in the first place, and it sure wasn’t about to start a war over them. The nuclear weapons that were in Ukraine also only had 12 year useful lives, 8 of which had already passed, and Ukraine didn’t have the money to properly maintain them.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3