Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "" video.

@alexdunphy3716 Like what? You have examples? I didn’t think so. Pretty much everything in Russia’s arsenal has panned out in Ukraine to be an overhyped joke. The T-14 isn’t even present, and neither is the Su-57. If the Su-57 was a true stealth fighter, it would be making the Ukrainian Patriot batteries lives difficult, but that’s not the case. Look at Russia’s Pantsir and S-400, both destroyed by weapons that they were supposed to be able to defeat themselves. Look at the Kinzhal. It’s been shot down multiple times. And how about Russia’s Zircon, which is supposedly in full operation, yet to date has never been used. Look at Russia’s tank tanks and armored vehicles, easily getting destroyed in large numbers. How about the Moskva, whose design was for air defense, yet it was destroyed by subsonic missiles.
107
@alexdunphy3716 All weapon systems have their development problems. And it’s funny how you brought up these problems that are available for everyone to see on the www. If anything, the US is being transparent, and not boasting. Russia on the other hand has claimed capabilities that are far exaggerated.
44
@Llyrin Great example! Plus, the AEGIS system has shown in numerous tests the capability to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles. It even was used to shoot down a falling satellite, which isn’t an easy task since its speed and trajectory aren’t easy to calculate. I recall this event very clearly like yesterday. The SM-3 was used, but its published range at that time was only 300 nm. It ended up flying around 500 nm to intercept the satellite.
18
@DIREWOLFx75 It’s right, but as a Russian troll you just don’t like it. Facts are that pretty much all of Russia’s weaponry in Ukraine has failed to impress anyone. Prove me wrong and tell us what has really stood out and working better than anyone expected.
18
@gregwilliams386 Exactly! When the war began Ukraine had nothing from the west, and then it was only in small numbers afterwards, In fact, four years ago Ukraine didn’t even have a legitimate standing army; its Air Force was and still is made up of old aircraft, and it doesn’t have a navy. What Ukraine has accomplished with so little is quite remarkable.
14
@alexdunphy3716 It’s funny watching you Russian trolls squirm not being able to accept that the Kinzhal isn’t anything special. Be honest with yourself. When was the last time Russia was ahead of the US in anything? Russia has a very long history of copying from the west, not vice versa. And Russia has a long history of overstating its capabilities, not vice versa. Look at every other Russian weapon in the war and they’ve all failed to impress. It’s beyond reason why this should surprise you.
12
@alexdunphy3716 There’s no video showing the Storm Shadow getting shot down. I saw the video, and there’s nothing showing that an actual Storm Shadow was shot down. Facts are that the S-400 has been destroyed several times by the Storm Shadow, a missile that the S-400 was supposed to be capable of defeating. Russia’s air defenses are even getting destroyed by drones. Azerbaijan had the same success against Armenian air defenses that Russia sold to them. If Russia’s air defenses are doomed a really good job, why is it that Ukraine has been striking targets at will? Even when Russia has known exactly what is being targeted, it’s been unable to stop the attacks. Bridges, airfields, barracks, combat centers, etc., have all been repeatedly hit, and Russia’s air defenses have failed every time. Russia’s air defenses aren’t doomed a really good job. Stop lying to yourself.
7
@jerrellholder8382 I guess you better go tell all the nations that are buying it that you’re more knowledgeable than their experts, and that they’re all more a big mistake! Israel and Japan like them enough that they bought even more. The F-35 is doing things that Russia can only dream about. It must suck to be you to have to live in denial.
7
@Llyrin I’m using my phone, and sometimes I don’t catch it when auto correct is used incorrectly. It drives me crazy.
6
⁠ @SCP-POOL Actually the 3-bearing swivel design already existed twenty years earlier in the Convair 100. What the Russian trolls don’t like to admit is that without Lockheed Martin funding the Yak never would have existed. In 1995, the U.S. weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin offered to jointly cooperate with the Yakovlev design Bureau (developer of the Yak-141). The arrangement ended after one year, but was a landmark as it was the first instance of military-technical cooperation between the former irreconcilable enemies. In exchange for paying for the costs of the project, Lockheed got some technical data about the project.
4
You’re funny. The only thing that the Su-57 can eat are bugs on its windshield. To this day the Su-57 still hasn’t even shown the ability to shoot its guns or missiles from internal bays in flight.
4
@gregwilliams386 Oops, my mistake. Thanks for the polite correction!
4
@АМЕРИКАНСКАЯМЕЧТА-я3в Show me! Yes, it’s not as easy as you think. If it could shoot missiles from its internal bays or shoot its guns, Russia would have shown it by now. If you want to see something really cool watch the F-22 shooting a Sidewinder missile from its internal bay while inverted. It’s something that only Russia can dream about.
3
@Llyrin Well said!
3
@АМЕРИКАНСКАЯМЕЧТА-я3в You’re a dummy. After the collapse of the USSR Yak was going bankrupt. Lockheed Martin stepped in and partnered with them and provided the funding. Without Lockheed the first prototypes never would have been completed. Lockheed already had the design to the 3-bearings Swivel Engine in the Convair 100 from twenty years earlier.
2
@АМЕРИКАНСКАЯМЕЧТА-я3в LOL, that’s all old news. The F-35 recently shot down a cruise missile and not too long ago a drone. It’s also struck multiple targets throughout Syria, including against Hezbollah. It’s continuing to rack up numerous sales, while Russia can’t find even one customer for the POS Su-57. The F-35 has a significant smaller radar cross section; its radars, sensors, avionics, situational awareness, etc., are all vastly superior. Just to put things into place almost 1,000 F-35s have been built. Only around 10 Su-57s have, and they aren’t anywhere near the battlefield. Russia still is developing its first AESA radar, which is a prerequisite for a 5th generation fighter, the U.S. has had it in service for over 20 years, and it’s in thousands of aircraft; and unlike Russia’s downed aircraft in Ukraine, US aircraft aren’t flying with GPS devices that a person can buy at Walmart! 😂
2
@АМЕРИКАНСКАЯМЕЧТА-я3в Ever hear the expression you get what you pay for? A good example is Russia’s Su-35. It looks fantastic on paper, but in reality not so much. Google “Russia's Su-35 fighter jet fails to stack up against rival warplanes” and you’ll find: “While the Su-35 is Russia's most advanced fighter plane, the war in Ukraine, head to head trials, and dissatisfied potential buyers prove it has significant disadvantages compared to other aircraft.” It continues to state, The Su-35's problems were further highlighted in 2021 when Egypt began negotiations to purchase the fighter jet. The limited avionics capabilities inside Russian Su-35 Flanker-E fighter jets severely hinder their ability to carry out missions assigned to fourth generation aircraft, according to numerous reports and analysts. "Then they ordered Su-35s, only to find out this is equipped with PESA radar, and they would have to wait for years (and pay even more) for the Russians to develop a suitable AESA radar," said aviation author Tom Cooper, according to a 2022 Forbes article, referring to passive electronically scanned array (PESA) and active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar technology. The Su-35 is the only major fourth-generation aircraft without the option of an AESA radar, a more advanced and sophisticated successor to the original PESA technology. AESA radars have longer range, higher ability to detect smaller targets and better resistance to jamming than do PESA radars. That means that other fourth-generation aircraft equipped with AESA radars are likely to be able to detect and engage an Su-35 beyond visual range (BVR) before it can react. "On top of this, they then ran a test, apparently using the first 2-3 Su-35s delivered to Egypt, against their Rafales, and it turned out the Su-35's PESA is simply no match," Cooper said, referring to a mock dogfight that Egypt organised in 2021. In the Egyptian test, the Rafale's countermeasure system "easily overpowered" the Su-35's radar system, he said.
2
@АМЕРИКАНСКАЯМЕЧТА-я3в Google Code One, F-35B Three Bearing Swivel Nozzel, and you’ll learn, “A great deal of misinformation has appeared on the Internet regarding the relationship of the Soviet Yak-41 (later Yak-141), NATO reporting name Freestyle, to the X-35 and the rest of the JSF program. The Pratt & Whitney 3BSD nozzle design predates the Russian work. In fact the 3BSD was tested with a real engine almost twenty years before the first flight of the Yak.” Ouch, the truth hurts doesn’t it?
2
Keep dreaming Ivan. Russia’s losing pilots in the war, and Russia’s pilots get a fraction of the flight time of American pilots. Plus, it’s Russia that has the long history of copying from the west, not vice versa!
1
Russia’s pilots don’t get a fraction of the training flight time that western pilots get, and Russia’s jet engines pale in comparison to their western counterparts.
1
😂The Su-57 is a joke. Most experts don’t even care it 5th generation. Its RCS is huge. Russia’s significantly behind in AESA radar. Russia’s longtime ally India backed out of the partnership to develop it because its disappointment with the fighter. The Su-57 hasn’t even shown the ability to launch its missiles from internal bays in flight, and we haven’t seen its guns firing in flight either.
1
@PLANETENKILLER_75 Sorry about that. Thanks for the clarification.
1
Nah, you’re just an envious Russian troll who can’t cope with the fact that Russia can’t compete against the west. Seriously, ask yourself what weapons of Russia have done well in Ukraine that distinguish them from others. There aren’t any. They’ve all failed at what they are supposed to do. On the other hand, look at the huge impact the weapons that have been sent to Ukraine. Early on Ukraine was not well armed at all, but yet NLAWs, Bayraktars, Javelins, Stingers, etc., all had a huge impact on holding off the Russians. Then later just a few HIMARS and 155 artillery immediately was able to stop the Russians from further advancing. GPS guided artillery, drones, etc., all played an important part. Then Ukraine started getting western air defenses, and Russia’s attacks went from taking out Ukrainian electric grids, to Ukraine’s being able to stop the attacks. The most recent delivery was ATACMS, and it instantly struck Russian helicopters, which forced Russia to move them further back from the front lines. This additional distance makes it much more difficult for these helos to stay on the battlefield to strike Ukrainian forces. What has been most telling is that Russia doesn’t have any answers to defeat these systems.Russia’s gone from a country that many respected to one that is laughed at for its incompetence, poor leadership, poor training, and poor equipment. You know things are not going well for Russia when countries like North Korea and Iran come to its aid.
1
@DIREWOLFx75 Haha, you call Ukraine’s old and outnumbered Air Force a peer enemy? Haha hahaha. Facts are if the US went up against Russia today, the Russian air force would get absolutely obliterated. Russia’s best fighter in service is its Su-35, and it’s a joke in comparison to western jets. Look up why Egypt cancelled its order for the remaining Su-35s, and you’ll discover how it was easily blinded by their recently purchased Rafale’s SPECTRA. China had the same experience when they had exercises of Su-35s going up against their J-10’s, which had AESA that jammed the Su’s antiquated PESA radar. When they US fought Iraq in the 1990s, Iraq’s air force was one of the largest and more modern air forces in the ME. It even included recently acquired MiG-29s. The US had to travel halfway across the world to fight, and even so Iraq’s air force was defeated in less than a month. The Russian air force doesn’t stand a chance against NATO, let alone the US.
1
@DIREWOLFx75 What are your sources? That is a complete lie. It’s obvious the Russian media which has never been honest. Russia’s lost a lot more men than Ukraine, not vice versa. It’s in videos, pictures, Russian soldiers who have been captured, Russian soldiers intercepted calls, family members calls, etc. Ukraine’s air force pre-2022 was only 125 aircraft, which are primarily old Soviet era fighters with antiquated avionics. Iraq in comparison had over 900 aircraft that included most modern MiG-29s. It was ranked as the world’s 5th largest air force, and it was battle hardened by its conflict with Iran. I’d like to see Russia go halfway across the world and defeat another country’s military in less than a month. Not going to happen. At the start of the war in 2022, all Ukraine had was a few manpads. Only recently has it started getting more advanced systems like Patriot, and it’s only got two of those. Russia had more than enough time to destroy Ukraine’s air force and air defenses. It failed miserably. In fact, early on in the war NATO countries wouldn’t provide Ukraine with more advanced systems because they feared Russia would overtake Ukraine’s military, and have access to western technology that they didn’t want Russia to reengineer. Russia attacked Ukraine for no legitimate reason whatsoever. It used the lame excuse that it’s because Ukraine is filled with Nazis, when in fact it was Russia that sided with the Nazis to attack Poland on a second front, which was the early beginnings of WWII. And Russia certainly didn’t attack Ukraine out of fear of NATO expansion. Russia had no problems with either Finland or Sweden joining, and Russia has removed most of its soldiers from the border with Finland to go and fight in Ukraine. It’s Russia that is sending massive amounts of men to their deaths. You can see it in numerous videos, pictures, and Russia’s soldiers even describe in intercepted calls how they are just treated as cannon fodder. Russia can’t even defeat Ukraine that didn’t even have a standing army four years ago. Russia’s navy has removed itself from the fight after getting humiliated by a country without a navy. And Ukraine’s army is primarily made up of old Soviet era equipment, with much of it captured from retreating Russian forces. Seriously, WTF are you so proud about? Logistically Russia can’t even win against a neighboring country, while the US had to travel halfway across the globe. Russia’s losing 12-1 against Ukraine. Unlike Russia, Ukraine shows the massive numbers of Russian dead forces littering the battlefield, while all Russia does is make up lies without any evidence.
1
I think you mean the non-existent stuff on the Su-57. As we’ve all learned from the war in Ukraine, Russia’s military is overhyped.
1
Well then you’re not too smart. The F-35 has a much smaller radar signature, its radars, sensors, AI, situational awareness, sensor fusion, aviation, are all significantly better than the Su-57. Just ask yourself an honest question. Why would Russia’s longtime ally, especially in regards to military partnerships, leave the partnership to develop the Su-57 unless it wasn’t happy about its progress? Facts are India had already invested several hundred millions into the partnership, and it decided to leave after having numerous concerns especially with its lack of stealth features and its unreliable and unpowered engines.
1
@alexdunphy3716 What you Russian trolls don’t seem to understand is that Russia’s constant bragging is exactly what US generals and the Pentagon want. It allows them to buy all these new expensive toys and to increase research funding in those areas. All the Pentagon has to do is show a video of Putin bragging about its weaponry, and that brings in the money to counter them, even if it’s just Russia lying like it typically does. Plus, the US has something that Russia doesn’t, DARPA. It funds some really off the wall crazy weaponry, some that works, some that doesn’t, yet it creates very innovative technology. Russia on the other hand primarily copies from the west, meaning that it’s always behind. It’s kind of like how the Russian media was bragging about how Russia captured a Bradley Fighting Vehicle. They said that they can now reverse engineer it and deploy the tech on its own equipment. That’s 40 year old technology. That is just an example of how far behind Russia is in comparison to the west.
1
@alexdunphy3716 Why you ask, because nothing else is working. Let’s just use common sense. The Zircon copied the design of the US X-51 Waverider, which broke the world record for hypersonic duration of flight over a decade ago. There’s even a video of it here on YouTube. Russia to this day still hasn’t shown the Zircon actually working, not even in tests. Russia’s using even S-400 missiles for ground attack, which they’re not designed for that function. Russia’s going to use whatever it has in its arsenal to attack Ukraine, and Ukraine would be a perfect place to see if it works as designed.
1
@alexdunphy3716 Google “Kyiv says it shoots down volley of Russian hypersonic missiles” and that’s from just one attack! It’s not even a big deal anymore. “Ukraine said on Tuesday it had shot down six Russian Kinzhal missiles in a single night, thwarting a weapon Moscow has touted as a next-generation hypersonic missile that was all but unstoppable.” Ukraine at one time admitted that it had no answer for the Kinzhal. That all changed within three weeks after the put in the field the Patriot.
1
@alexdunphy3716 Why do you Russian trolls lie so often? If the T-14 hasn’t passed state trails, why would Russia even try it in combat? See below: “In July, the few Armata tanks that were sent to aid Russia’s frontline efforts in Ukraine were allegedly withdrawn from the conflict altogether. Russian state-run news outlet TASS first reported that the MBTs were taken out of the war following their brief stint in combat operations. The Kremlin often boasts that its new Armata platform is the best of the best and can outperform any near peers. However, obviously, the T-14 Aramata tank has not performed as well as expected since it only lasted two months on the battlefield before being withdrawn altogether. By 2020, Russia’s Ministry of Defense announced that the T-14 had been combat-tested in Syria However, following the launch of Russia’s Ukraine invasion in February 2022, the country’s Armata production line ceased.”
1
@jerrellholder8382 The Patriot has intercepted numerous Russian missiles, including more recently Russian ballistic missiles. It’s also shot down Russian fighters. I wouldn’t say that it is not doing anything. Only a gullible Russian troll who watches too much Russian propaganda would say something stupid like that. The only missiles that are routinely not working as intended are Russia’s crap. Russia’s gotten so desperate that it’s using both S-300s and S-400s for ground attack weapons. I guess if they don’t work shooting down Ukrainian missiles then Russia might as well find a new use for them as ground attack weapons. 😂
1
@jerrellholder8382 When did the Patriot get destroyed? If you knew how it actually worked, you’d know how stupid you’d have to believe that. The Patriot missile battery is made up of many different systems, all spread out over many kilometers. To destroy a Patriot battery is nearly impossible. A component was damaged, but Ukraine was able to quickly fix it on its own without even needing US help to maintain it. It’s almost comical reading Russian troll comments like yours. It’s obviously that you’re gullible enough to believe Russian propaganda, which you should know by now is rarely honest. I actually feel sorry for you.
1
@DIREWOLFx75 You read too much propaganda. “To guide Krasnopol, Russia employs unmanned aerial vehicles to illuminate targets with a laser beam.However, low cloud has been the key limiting factor in the round’s performance because its laser detector does not have time to spot the laser energy and manoeuvre for striking.” What is comical is your bragging about Russia’s artillery, while Ukrainian soldiers literally laugh at how inaccurate it is. You fail to recognize that it’s dependent on a laser finder, which is affected by poor weather, visibility, smoke screens, plus if the laser designator is destroyed it’s ineffective. The Excalibur has been extensively effective, and it’s destroyed hundreds of Russian tanks and armored vehicles. You knock the Javelins, yet they’re the missiles that held back Russian tanks on numerous occasions. You can lie all you want. It’s why people don’t trust Russians. The Javelins have been so effective that Ukrainians are even naming their kids after them. There are numerous videos of Russian tanks getting annihilated by them. You got a credible source about the kill rate? Of course not. All you Russian trolls do is lie. There’s a reason why Russia’s military got no sales at the recent arms exhibition, while the US companies racked up billions in sales, and that’s because Russian weapons are a joke. I’ll look at the rest of your ridiculous comments later when I have more time, but thanks for the laugh!
1
@DIREWOLFx75 LOL, you are a comedian! [The Russian ATGMs have been highly effective against western tanks and other AFVs. ] Is that why Ukrainians are so thankful to have Bradely Fighting Vehicles? They've taken repeated hits and kept going. In the meantime, Russian tanks continue to set world records for turret tosses. I've seen numerous Javalins and NLAWS destorying Russian tanks over and over. You're just too embarrassed to watch the videos because they're easy to find. [When the number of Javelins fired against Russian tanks dropped below a ratio of 1 kill per 50 fired, ] What's your source, your ass? HAHAHA. The fact that you have to lie in every comment tells me that you know yourself that you're wrong. [Guess why you hear no requests for more of them] You don't pay attention to the news do you? Ukraine is continuing to ask for and receive Javalins. In fat, Estonia just provided another supply. [Stinger likewise, literally THOUSANDS have been used. And there's not even a single hard confirmed kill by them] Why am I not surprised, you lied again. Here's just one of many examples: On 22 May, retired Major general Kanamat Botashev, fighting for Wagner PMC, was killed in Luhansk Oblast when his Su-25 was shot down by a FIM-92 Stinger missile. [Russia quickly achieved a 80+% successful interception ratio against them. Which was supposed to be impossible according to the company that makes the Patriot] And yet another lie. If that was the case why has Ukraine been so successful in destroying bridges, barraks, ammo dumps, command centers, airfields, etc., which have been protected by Russian SAMS? HIMARS has totally changed the couse of the war and made Russia look like a fool. [Latest model thermal imaging in Russian tanks outperform the best the west have by about 50%.] And of course another lie. Doesn't having integrity to be honest mean anything to you? If your statement was true, why would Russia announce that it is going to reverse engineer the thermal imaging systems that it imports from France? You're a fool. [Latest update on Ukraine KIAs, in excess of 1 million. ] HAHAHA, Where did you get that number from, the Russian media, the least trustworthy source in the world? You can literally find numerous videos of dead Russian soldiers litering the battlefields. In some case they are piled sky kigh. Interecepted phone call of Russian soldiers have described how they load up one truckload after another of dead Russians. Grow up and stop lying!
1
@shannonbertram5513 Another dense Russian. The F-35 is far superior than the piece of 💩 Su-57. There’s a simple reason why nobody is buying the Su-57, it sucks. The F-35 continues to rack up sales, with almost a thousand built. After seeing how poorly Russian equipment has worked in Ukraine, Russia will be lucky if anyone wants to buy its crap.
1
@shannonbertram5513 Google U.S. arms makers dominated last week's Dubai Airshow, as Russia failed to report a single sale, with one executive claiming the country had been sidelined from the exhibition's main pavilion. Russian officials brought with them to the exhibition 250 samples of weapons and equipment, but its state aerospace and defense company Rosoboronexport did not secure a single contract during the event. 😂
1
@DIREWOLFx75 Hey, I got a present for you! Watch the video from EngineerReact called “Three anti-tank Kornet Missiles Miss Ukrainian T-64BV Tank. Yeah, those Russian anti-tank missiles are real impressive, NOT!
1
@Mastakilla91 Typical Russian troll reply, one of no substance because you can’t argue the point because you know already that I’m right.
1