Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "" video.

Good ole’ Russian living in denial.
1
@krenarparllaku563 Now Russia has over 700K casualties, it’s lost in Syria, and its ruble is as valuable as a piece of toilet paper, and still no NATO troops have lost their lives.
1
More Russian denial. The war in Ukraine has shown the world that Russia’s military was way too overhyped in both capabilities and equipment.
1
You’re just living in denial. It took some time for the Saudis to learn how to use the Patriot, but now that they know they’ve been very effective intercepting missiles. You just can’t admit that the Kinzhal is nothing special. It’s just a ballistic missile, which like so many others can be intercepted. What I love is reading comments like yours. You’re intentionally ignoring the facts that Alex presents, which makes you stupid.
1
No, you just can’t accept the truth, no matter how much is given. Facts are that Kinzhal is just an airborne version of the Iskander, a ballistic missiles that like many other ballistic missiles flies at hypersonic speeds. The US has for many years been able to intercept ballistic missiles, and you can find many examples here on YouTube showing it. There are many videos showing US SM-3, SM-6, PAC-3, THAAD, etc., intercepting ballistic missiles. The Kinzhal is nothing special like what Russia wants people to believe. Russia has a long history of overhyping its capabilities, and this is just another example of it.
1
@pavelvladimirov2651 Russia makes that claim, but Russia makes many claims that aren’t true. So far it’s only demonstrated that it acts like a typical ballistic missile, and that’s why it’s been able to be intercepted.
1
@pavelvladimirov2651 Prove what exactly? Has Russia ever shown the Kinzhal preforming the maneuvers that you have described? I guess you can’t because it hasn’t happened. Can I prove that the Patriot has intercepted ballistic missiles before? Yes, there are many videos here on YouTube showing it doing such. Has Russia’s military underperformed during the war? Most definitely. Its Moskva couldn’t even intercept subsonic missiles. Its air defenses have been unable to protect bridges, command centers, arms depots, barracks, etc., even when its known precisely what is being targeted. You’re the one who has not proven anything, and your words are based on Russia’s claims, which we have seen many times cannot be trusted.
1
Why should NATO get involved when Russia is already struggling against Ukraine? If NATO actually fought Russia would have lost a long time ago. The benefit of a drawn out war is that it’s slowly bleeding Russia’s military, its influence, its power projection globally, and its economy.
1
It’s factual, you just can’t cope with it.
1