Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Military Summary" channel.

@turtleninjaa5353 It’s the Russian army that’s the biggest joke. Its retreating forces have been Ukraine’s largest support of tanks. The US has proven Ukraine with just 40 HIMARS units and look at how much trouble they’ve caused Russia. The US army has over 400 of them. The US has provided Ukraine with just 300 Bradleys that are just old models just collecting dust in the US. The US has thousands of more modern ones in its army. Russia couldn’t even stop Wagner when it was heading towards Moscow. You’re just bitter that the Russian military isn’t as good as you thought it was.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Whatever.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Most did want to join and what proof do you have that those who didn’t were beaten up by the government? Sounds like a typical Russian troll comment to me, in other words a lie.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Just as I thought, you don’t have any proof. Do you mean the Russian lies about what happened in Donbas? Ukraine challenged Russia to provide evidence before the UN of Ukrainian atrocities in the Donbas region as Russia accused it of committing. Guess what Russia did? It boycotted the hearings! It would have been the perfect time for Russia to justify its invasion, but instead it confirmed that all Russia can do is lie. You really should know better by now.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Just as I thought you don’t have any proof. You mean the lies about Donbas? Ukraine challenged Russia to provide evidence before the UN of Ukrainian crimes in the Donbas region as accused by Russia. Guess what Russia did? It boycotted the hearings. It would have been the perfect time for Russia to justify its invasion, but instead it just confirmed that Russia lied once again. You should know better by now.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Because they don’t meet the membership requirements. Try doing research before commenting.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Yep, you don’t have proof. You mean the Russian lies about Donbas?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Watch some interviews with some of the people in Donbas. Most are not at all happy with what Russia has done in the region. Russia’s evil. Everyone knows it.
1
@robertbradbury7921 Yep, no proof, just as expected.
1
@robertbradbury7921 You mean the lies that Russia told about Donbas?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Russia didn’t invade Ukraine because of its wanting to join NATO. It was a land grab. Nothing more. NATO isn’t going to invade Russia. Russia had no problem with either Sweden or Finland joining the alliance, and Russia’s pulled its troops from its border with Finland to use them in Ukraine. Why can Finland and Sweden join but not Ukraine?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 A better question is what kind of friendship can Ukraine have with a country like Russia that invaded it? Why would Ukraine want to be anything like Russia when the standard of living is much better in EU countries?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 That’s not true at all. The Baltics have flourished under the EU. Why do you think that the Baltic countries are donating so much to Ukraine? They’re donating more per GNP than all other countries. Other than Moscow and Saint Petersburg, the rest of Russia isn’t very desirable. Ukraine is an independent country that should be able to make its own decisions. It wants nothing to be like Russia, yet Russia can’t let it go. This war is Russia’s fault, nobody else’s.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 You don’t see anywhere near the level of poverty in the UK as in Russia. People live in places in Russia that would be condemned in the UK. Russia talks, talks, talks, nothing more. Russia’s not going to pass Germany. Russia’s income is from raw materials, and much of the world is buying from other countries instead of Russia.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 I don’t lie. There’s no need to. Ukraine has been rejected from joining NATO several times. You’re the one lying. Why can Sweden and Finland join NATO but not Ukraine? If NATO was such a threat why has Russia pulled its forces from its border with Finland and sent them to Ukraine? You keep avoiding these questions because you know you’re wrong. When has NATO ever invaded another country in order to conquer territory? Never. It’s not like Russia.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 I’m not even going to entertain your hypothetical situation because it’s ridiculous. Unlike Russia the US is friends with its neighbors. Why does Russia require certain privileges that its borders must be neutral? No other country requires a buffer zone. If Russia got along better with its neighbors it wouldn’t be in this situation.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Who cares what Putin thinks? Why does Russia require these privileges? You still haven’t answered my earlier questions. Why was it okay with Russia for both Sweden and Finland to join NATO but Ukraine can’t? If Russia is so threatened by NATO why would it pull its troops from its border with Finland and send them to Ukraine? No joke, there are satellite photos that show the Russian bases vacated. Russia would not do this if NATO was such a threat.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 If Russia didn’t invade Ukraine then neither Sweden or Finland would have joined NATO. It’s not a stupid decision at all. They know their future security is more assured when it’s part of NATO than without. Can you blame them? Just look at how Russia treats countries that aren’t part of NATO. Putin is a dictator who wants the days of the USSR back. In 2015 he said, “Above all, we should acknowledge that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century. As for the Russian nation, it became a genuine drama. Tens of millions of our co-citizens and co-patriots found themselves outside Russian territory. Moreover, the epidemic of disintegration infected Russia itself.”
1
@johnathanpearson3203 There’s a big difference with Iraq. Iraq was a neighborhood bully that invaded Kuwait. It was also suspected of having WMD’s which it agreed not to have after various UN Resolutions that were imposed because its using mustard gas on the Kurds in Northern Iraq. 😮
1
@johnathanpearson3203 The US didn’t use uranium shells illegally. Tell me what laws did the US break? None. And the effects of DU are widely disputed. It’s not like how Russia uses white phosphorus and cluster rounds on towns, which are actual war crimes. The US had good reason to believe Iraq had chemistry weapons. Saddam himself admitted after he was captured that he tried to deceive the world he did. It wasn’t out of fear of the U.S., which he never thought would actually attack, but because of his fear of Iraq invading and conquering Baghdad. Furthermore, Iraq wouldn’t allow UN inspectors access to all the sites suspected of having chemical weapons. Iraq wasn’t able to account for all the weapons. US army disposal experts who got ill were shown to have been exposed to chemical weapons. Iraqis witnesses also told the west that Saddam still had them. What they didn’t tell was that they actually wanted the west to overthrow Saddam. You really need to go back to school. The US didn’t invade Vietnam. It was helping the South defend itself from the invasion by communist North Vietnam.
1
@johnathanpearson3203 Almost everything that you wrote is either misleading or is wrong. No WMD were found, but there was good reason to believe that they were there. And when it comes to being held accountable, Russia is long overdue. Some of the atrocities that Russia has committed in Ukraine are pure evil. Russia also needs to be held responsible for the downing of MH-17 passenger jet and the civilian jet that was shot down by Russian fighters when it was heading to Japan. In contrast, when the U.S. accidentally shot down an Iranian airliner the US owned up to it and paid $62 million back in 1996 to the victims families, which equates to approximately $135 million today. Russia in the other hand has paid nothing for its faults. Quite frankly we expect this from Russia.
1
YouTube censors? Seriously wtf? You remove posts even when they are accurate?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Nah, you need to ask Putin.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Thanks for the clarification. Yeah, it’s total bs but I don’t believe Blinken would help. I think some YouTube censors get power hungry and use their yielding power to delete comments that they really have no understanding about.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 Wow, good to know! Thank you for sharing. Much appreciated.
1
This channel’s name should be changed to The Russian Propaganda Channel. It’s worse than Pravda and RT. Sad thing is so many Russians actually believe it without having any credible proof. For instance, Russia showed a burnt up F-16 as proof of the destruction of a missile strike, when in reality it was a F-16 crash site that happened in the US back in 2019.
1