Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Truthstream Media" channel.

The_Monk_Weee! Don't forget how he also lied about the "little green men" in Crimea. He's also lied about the MH-17 shoot down. He has a history of lying but the pro-Russian trolls seem to forget and forgive him rather quickly.
2
LeCrazyCanuckEh Not really. Russia drops a few bombs and its people think its Syria's savior. Even tiny Bahrain has dropped a few bombs on ISIS, but unlike Putin, Bahrain didn't lie about who they were dropping bombs on. Putin hasn't targeted ISIS, but anti-Assad forces, and it hasn't targeted AQ at all. Pretty much everything he wrote is misguiding or not true. Don't fall for it and do research on your own.
1
Adrian Perez I agree. No matter what the US does it will piss off people. When it kills innocent people by mistake it gets criticized, and when it doesn't kill the terrorists efficiently because innocent people around it also gets criticized. In Afghanistan, the Taliban would place kids outside their meeting places knowing that the US wouldn't bomb it. The terrorists take advantage of this, and it is something that Russia doesn't seem to care about, which in a way might be the right approach to take against these POS.
1
AwesomePossom I'm with you. I can't stand such a weak pussy of a President. He expects a lot out of our soldiers, but at the same time he cuts back on military spending. Go figure....Our military does what it is asked; it's just too bad that they have such a dumbass as him as Commander in Chief. At least he will only be in office for a short time more. Just imagine if you were Russia. There's the possibility that the Russians have to have Putin as their leader until 2024, or possibly even longer if he wishes to continue his run. What a conceited prick that thinks he's God's gift to the world. He is just as bad at lying like Obama. No body should be in office that long. Too many things can be hid and you're not held accountable. That's why I'm hoping eventually Assad is replaced. Tell your dad thanks for serving. It takes a good person to set aside personal feelings towards the Commander in Chief; yet at the same time continue to do a good job. I'd buy him a beer, if I could. For 16 you're quite mature with your opinion. Shit, when I was that age I only thought of pussy and partying. Try to get some while you're young. You only live once so enjoy it. ;)
1
aucourant Of course the US wants ISIS defeated. Just because it doesn't want to put troops into combat doesn't mean that it doesn't want to defeat them. If there's one weakness of the US, it's that the US population doesn't tolerate deaths of its troops very well. In addition, the US has a history of once putting troops on the ground, those numbers increase drastically, and the next thing you know the US is in another full fledged war, something we're all tired of. And then again, ISIS isn't just a US problem, it's a world problem.
1
aucourant Russia hasn't done anything more than NATO. It's just Russian propaganda. Most of Russia's fighting has been against the FSA, not ISIS, and little has been gained. It's the same mess that it has been, The US is not complaining about Russia killing AQ or ISIS, but is complaining that the Russians focus on FSA.
1
aucourant That's not true. The US is supporting anti-Assad forces, but it doesn't support ISIS or AQ, which is the only commonality have, which is their destruction. It's relative simple, Russia supports Assad, and the US doesn't. There are many anti-Assad forces that are not AQ aor ISIS, and Russia isn't interested in any other ruler except ASsad. It makes sense as Assad has been a long time ally and Russia can't afford to lose another friend.
1
Kodos el Destructor Russia has not focused on ISIS but on FSA. IF Russia were so determined to wipe out ISIS, it would be fighting them in many other places than just Syria. The only reason why Russia is n Syria is because it needs Assad to rule the nation and continue to be Russia's ally.
1
People that think Putin would be good US President need to have their heads examined.Do a little research and find how he treats those that oppose him or don't join in on his bandwagon. He's not a good person.
1
Jason Rentaponga If you think most Americans agree with what Putin is saying then you're crazy. He's an egotistical prick that has been shown to repeatedly lie in the past.Why the hell should we believe him now, and what do you find that he says is so convincing?
1
s. loren Gallo LOL, there's no proof at all. People that fall for conspiracy theorists bullshit are generally gullible, and it seems that you fall into that category. The "explosive material" that you mention was thermite. It's not nearly as volatile as TNT or plastic explosives. Experts stated it would have taken 30,000 TONS of it to bring down the tower. How would such a large amount get transported, stored, and wired without anyone noticing?. Where the hell would they have stored such a large amount of explosives without anyone noticing? Use your brain. Footage of the towers showed that they collapsed where the aircraft hit them. That means not only would all those explosives need to be stored there, but the pilots would have had to hit those exact floors, not just once but twice. Even expert pilots have said that would not be easy, let alone rookie pilots that we're flying the aircraft.Not only READ, but THINK, USE COMMON SENSE! I went to your Channel page. It's obvious that you dislike the US. Your comments show it. You spread many lies and your comments are strongly biased against the US. You have no credibility. That's one common trait that I have found about people like you, you cannot be trusted. Like all other nations, the US has a checkered past. It's part of politics. I'm not sure why you dislike the US so much to lie the way you do, but all you're doing is spreading hate. Before commenting next time, see if you can be honest. Are you even capable, or is that you're nature and to be expected? I suspect the later.
1
***** Using simple common sense alone should tell you that an inside job of this magnitude an so early in Bush's presidency would be nearly impossible. People just like to get on the anti-US bandwagon and accept conspiracy theories no matter how ridiculous they are. And just because they don't release pictures of one of the most secure facilities in the world doesn't mean that it was an inside job. People are going to believe what they want to believe no matter how much information is provided to them, and even when it is provided they often question the validity of it. Keep in mind that back then the people of the US never envisioned such an event so of course our guard was down. People could even freely visit the cockpit. The security measures that you see today are a result of what happened. It's funny how soon people forget. It's just like waterboarding. Right after 9/11 the pubic pretty much said do whatever it takes to not let this happen again. Torture the SOB's if necessary was the mentality. Today is a different story. The public doesn't tolerate these kinds of actions. Like I said, how soon we all forget.
1
Thrashaero Wow, you just took my comment and reversed it. Very clever but stupid at the same time. Why don't you tell me how the Twin Towers were destroyed if it weren't for the aircraft?
1
Kristina Quint LOL, PROVE IT!
1
***** Bullshit. Prove it!
1
hpensive Your example is not a good one. Neither the bricks or the hard metal object are combustible like in 9/11.
1
Tom Hill Why's that Tom? You got proof? If you used common sense you would find that the conspiracy theory as being ridiculous.
1
Tom Hill Why don't you explain to me how the buildings collapsed if it weren't for the aircraft hitting them, you "tool"? Your jumping to the immediate conclusion that the highjackers passport being found on the floor to the US being responsible is asinine. Like I said earlier, use common sense!
1
hpensive The jet fuel didn't burn the steel from the building. What you seem burning from the side of the building is the aluminum from the airplane itself. If you watch the collapse of the towers its evident that the heat stress and weight on the building at the point of impact caused the collapse. In fact there's video that shows the building bowing inward from the beams stress from the heat. Once the beams buckled (not burned or melted) the building came down from the point of impact.
1
Tom Hill What, question is that? Is it that buildings don't fall straight down? Who says they don't. The Twin Towers did. I'm not a structural engineer so obviously I won't be able to answer all questions. However, just using simple common sense should tell you that it wasn't an inside job.
1
Thrashaero What are you a physicist? Don't pretend that you are. Taking physics in high school or college doesn't count. I've been there, done that. The Twin Towers did fall staright down and that was due to the way it was built. You don't even realize that by using that argument that it opposes your point of view. If it were a planned explosion, the building never would have fallen the way it did. Planned explosions are done at the base of the building and don't fall the way the towers did. It's also obvious when you watch the film that the weight on top on the beams that they were under heat stress and gave way. Footage shows the collapse started at the point where the aircraft hit the buildings. You can also find footage right before the collapse showing the inward bend in the buildling. It was obvious the beams were not melting but were bending and finally gave in to the top weight of the structure. Nothing else makes sense other than what really happened. Some people just refuse to belieive it solely because they distrust the US govt. When you look at all the facts, it's obvious that the towers came down by terrorist scum flying into the buildings. Not only do the facts support that the aricraft caused the towers to fall, but logistically there would be no way for George Bush to put into action such an evil doing in such a short time. His Presidency just started so that would have meant that another President, Bill Clinton, was alos involved. There's no way in hell you're going to get a Democrat and Republican to ever work with each, and especially on something like this that would be treason. Don't you have any common sense, or do you just comment without caring if you're making any sense?
1
Tom Hill Why's that? Are you being vauge because you lready know that you're wrong and don't want to dig yourself into a hole any deeper? You're the one that's clueless. Seriously, you believe in some dumbass conspiracy theory that has no balls to it. If you're that gullible, I have a bridge to sell ya. BTW, I am not God. I don't have the answers to everything. Furthermore, you asked a question about the terrorist's pasport being found on the ground, and I provided an answer that was showed it was not the terrorist's passport, but that was just a stupid myth.. Even if it was his passport, that doesn't mean anything. There's lots of debris found after airplane crashes. Not everything gets destroyed. Wierd shit happens in life. Remember when the US accidentally shot down the airliner in the Persian Gulf where hundreds of Iranians died. All the passengers were naked in the water. Low and behold, conspiracy theory bullshit raised its ugly head. You can make up a conspiracy teory for nearly occurence. There will always be coincidences. You just need the ability to sperate the bullshit from fact, soething it seems that you're not good at. You look at the little wird shit and ignore the obvious facts. Jumping to the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job due to the so-called found terrorist passport is quite a stretch in using one's imagination. Then I asked you a question, which you've continued to avoid from day one. If the buidlings were destroyed by explosives, how didn't the office workers notice them? My question is a hell of a lot more relevant than yours, and there is no logical answer for it. Face it, you're wrong. Get over it and move on.
1
Jesse Doyle I've never read so much bullshit in all my life. There's too much too address so I am going to stick to the subject. "Hence the reason for Thermite usage 8 years later." LOL, you act as though that is some conclusive fact. According to experts, thermite is not explosive enough to have done the damage that was incurred unless a very large amount was used. In fact, it would have taken at least 30000 tons of it to bring down each tower:. Per Chemical engineer T. Mark Hightower, an expert in this filed of technology: "He gave a range of numbers, based on lower and higher concentrations of the thermite formulation. His lowest figure amounted to 29,000 metric tons of thermitic explosive per tower – a value hundreds of times greater than the calculation for conventional explosives. His “conservative” estimate (based on 10% iron-oxide in the thermitic material) was 143,000 metric tons of thermitic material that would have been placed in each tower. But let’s be realistic: How could the perpetrators drag in and plant over 100,000 tons of explosive without being seen? Even 29,000 tons is hard to imagine and would have been rather difficult to put in place unnoticed."
1
Jesse Doyle Have you ever visited the Twin Towers? I have. It was a unique structure. Its floors were very wide open. Whether you like it or not, the plane went through. It's easily seen on video. What do you think we imagined it? Use common sense. There's no way it was an inside job. Seriously, think of what it would have taken. To pull this off as an inside job the government would have had to store explosives on the floors where people worked without them being noticed. Then, it would take two rookie pilots to hit those floors where the explosives are stored w/o destroying the triggering mechanism. Not only that, but hitting the floors by even experienced pilots would be difficult. Then you would need a massive cover up. No way in hell are you going to find fellow Americans willing to do such an evil deed. The event also occurred at the early onset of Bush's Presidency, and there's no way a C student like him could have come up with such an evil plan in such a short time. None of it adds up. Like I said, use common sense and be reasonable. I'm not going to address your other comments. I don't have that kind of time.
1
Tom Hill LOL, you're the one to talk. I've answered everyone of your questions, yet you still can't answer one question of mine: How the hell did the people not notice the explosives and wiring if this were a demolition? I've shown videos that clearly show that explosives did not bring down the towers and you still argue just for the sake of it. Grow up. And who says that I should know everything? None of us are experts here; but at least we can try to use common sense. All you've done is demonstrate a complete lack of using logic. WTF do you find so convincing that this is an inside job? You haven't provided anything substantive or convincing, and just because you think so doesn't fly. Just admit that you're wrong. The conspiracy theory makes no sense and you haven't proven anything other than sheer ignorance and stubbornness. In fact, most conspiracy theorists like to take the rebel attitude to try to seem more intellegent than others by convicing themselves that they are capable of thinking outside of the box, while in fact all it shows is that you're gullible to believing other's nonsense. Think on your own, and stop arguing just for the sake of it.
1
Edward Spreen What's your proof Ed?
1
Reggae Lyrics-man You do realize that there are no facts to support your comment, right?
1
keen azlan My gaud, you can't be serious. Back then it was easy as hell to get on and off an aircraft. The cabin door was open, and people could leisurely visit with the pilots. There weren't tight measures in place to stop this kind of horrific event. And yes, I do say use common sense, which conspiracy theorists about the subject matter have failed to do. You're even failing to use it in your comment by not recognizing that times are different today than when they were pre- 9/11.
1
I don't trust any politicians, including Putin. They're all liars. Quite honestly, Putin and the Russians have blamed all the world's problems on the US, even natural disasters like earthquakes. He has shown to be a liar himself with his confessing about the "little green men" in Crimea.
1