Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Kyiv Post" channel.

  1. I wish they’d shut it off in Saint Petersburg so that we don’t have to read all the Russian troll BS here on YouTube.
    129
  2. These are the true Russians fighting for what they know is best for the future of their country.
    104
  3.  @maryginger4877 Russia at one time held 27% of Ukraine, but now it’s only around 20%. Yes, Russia is making gains, very small gains while losing large numbers of troops and equipment. Ukraine doesn’t have the luxury of a large population like Russia. It needs to be more careful about its losses. Russia in the meantime is taken heavy losses. Russia’s using 60 year old tanks, artillery, etc., and it has had to go to North Korea and Iran for help. Considering that Russia supposed to be a world power, it has shown that it’s at best a regional power.
    17
  4.  @NicholasJames-eh7xd Jesus is God, and Russia thought it could take Kyiv in three days!
    8
  5. Ukraine would have lost by now if it wasn’t for the U.S. Despite having no obligation to help whatsoever, the United States has provided more aid by far than any other country. To make it a fair comparison, you have to compare the rest of the world to the United States. Maybe if the rest of the NATO nations had listened to the U.S. advice for almost two decades to spend more on defense, Ukraine wouldn’t be in this predicament of where it’s been so dependent on US military aid.
    6
  6.  @RodolfLeclerc You have to take the entirety of Europe to compare to the US. US is by far the largest single contributor, and it doesn’t have any obligation to help whatsoever. The US also provides intel and logistical support that’s invaluable. And finally, if the EU countries took the US advice for almost 20 years ago to today to significantly increase defense spending, the Ukrainians wouldn’t be so dependent on the US. This war is in Europe’s own backyard. They should take ownership to it.
    6
  7. Excellent commentary! Thank you for explaining the video to us.
    4
  8.  @philg2415 How many times has France said it would send troops to Ukraine and backed out? France has been one of the smallest contributors. It’s nothing to be boasting about.
    4
  9.  @jonpetter8921 Let’s not twist the facts that the US has no obligation to even help. It’s also providing weapons that EU countries don’t have. Zelenskyy himself has said without US support that Ukraine will lose. The war is in Europe’s own backyard. The EU nations should be contributing more, a lot more. Plus, you have to compare all of Europe to even make a comparison. The U.S. advised its EU allies going back to the Bush administration in the 2000’s to spend more on defense, and every president since has been delivering a similar message. Instead our allies told us to mind our own business, and they did the exact opposite. If they had listened Ukraine wouldn’t be in this horrible predicament.
    3
  10.  @philipb2134 You’re kidding, right? You don’t think that the HIMARS have made a big impact on? Or how about the ATACMS, especially the ones carrying cluster munitions? And what about all the millions of artillery shells, many thousands of Patriot missiles, Javelins, Stingers, drones, counter artillery radars, HARM anti radiation missiles, MALD decoys, etc.?
    3
  11. Russia won’t agree to the 1991 borders. It’s not going to give up the land it’s taken, especially with the high losses that it’s suffered to take it. Ukraine doesn’t have the manpower to retake the land. It’s going to need to really think about how much land it’s willing to give in exchange for peace.
    3
  12. @jonathanlyng3442The main problem with trying to avoid U.S. export control laws when it comes to chip production is that nearly every manufacturer uses U.S. software. It’s why TSMC the world’s largest chip manufacturer had to stop sending Russia high tech chips.
    2
  13.  @johnvannisselroy6197 The US has no obligation to help at all. It could have done nothing if it wanted, and yet it’s the single largest contributor by a long shot.
    2
  14. @ Your knowledge of history is pathetic. The US was an isolationist country back before the two world wars. It also wasn’t even a top ten military power. The world was much larger back then. It didn’t have the internet and only the very wealthy flew. If it was not for the U.S. you would be speaking either German or Russian right now. You’re the kind of person why Americans question why we should help Europe at all. We’ve warned you for almost 20 years the need to increase defense spending, and you told us to not interfere, and then did the exact opposite. We also advised Europe to stop relying so heavily on Russian oil and gas, which fueled its war machine, and again you did the exact opposite. And now you’re crying about the US holding Europe accountable for its own protection. Europeans countries sent token forces to Afghanistan to fight against Al Qaeda and ISIS. They aren’t just a US problem, they’re a world problem.
    2
  15. @ Wrong. You should at least read the Budapest Memorandum before referencing it. It says nothing about helping Ukraine. Use common sense. Do you really think that the U.S. would sign a document to protect another country that wasn’t even a friend? What other agreements do you think the U.S. has abandoned because so far you’re zero out of one.
    2
  16.  @StreetsOfRage2 Why are you lying? The Budapest Memorandum said no such thing. It said that the US, UK, and Russia would all respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial borders. Nothing was said about providing weapons, training or even defending Ukraine. Read the memorandum before making any more stupid comments.
    2
  17. Ah, another Russian troll living in denial. Go figure…
    1
  18. He didn’t say that Russia is losing “so badly.” The only reason why Russia keeps advancing, remind you in very small amounts, is because it’s able to recruit 30K a month. Do you think Russia keep losing so many men while gaining very little territory?
    1
  19.  @operator9858  It’s sad that you’re so ignorant.
    1
  20.  @operator9858  Have you not seen the ATACMS, HIMARS, SDBs, attacks on Russian forces? Every day videos are released showing Russians taking huge losses.
    1
  21.  @operator9858  I have tried several times to post comments, but they’re not showing up.
    1
  22.  @operator9858  Just watch Warthog defense and you’ll see that it’s much more than just drones.
    1
  23.  @operator9858  It happens to me daily. 🤨 I don’t have much faith in numbers because they can be manipulated. I see the numerous videos of Russian soldiers complaining about battlefield conditions, and having to be sent back to the front even when wounded. Just look at the little land Russia has gained, and how much it’s lost in return.
    1
  24.  @operator9858  It also shows numerous strikes on Russian forces, which are much more than just by drones. Its commentary is definitely biased, but the videos of combat speak for themselves.
    1
  25.  @DirkGently1972 Just curious, what do you think the U.S. should do if you were the U.S. president?
    1
  26.  @malcolmgibson5088 You have to take the entirety of Europe to compare to the U.S. contribution, and Europe should be contributing more. The war is in Europe’s neighborhood. The US didn’t even have to help. It’s got no obligation whatsoever. And the U.S. is providing weapons that have been essential in on the battlefield. If EU countries had increased their defense spending like the U.S. has suggested for over a decade Ukraine wouldn’t be so dependent on U.S. support.
    1
  27.  @malcolmgibson5088  The US wasn’t even an ally of Ukraine when the memorandum was signed. The U.S. signed the memorandum because it feared the nukes would get into the wrong hands, and Ukraine didn’t even want them. Furthermore, other than being a dirty bomb the nukes would be practically worthless today since they had 12 year useful lives, 8 of which had already passed. The UK should help. The war is in your own backyard.
    1
  28.  @malcolmgibson5088  Europe has done better? 😂 It’s the US HIMARS and millions of rounds of artillery shells that have done better. It’s the U.S. cluster munitions that has been very effective on the battlefield. It’s the US Patriot missiles that have intercepted the Kinzhal, Zircon and Iskander missiles. It’s the US Bradleys slowing down the Russian offenses. It’s the US’s logistical capabilities getting the weapons there the most, and the US intel has been invaluable. The UK provides a few Scalp missiles and thinks it’s done its job.
    1
  29.  @johnvannisselroy6197  No, it says to actually read the memorandum. It says nothing about protecting or even providing aid to Ukraine. It would be like the U.S. entering into an agreement to protect Syria 30 years from now. It’s absolutely ridiculous.
    1
  30.  @johnvannisselroy6197  Maybe you should go back to school. You seem to have a reading comprehension problem.
    1
  31.  @johnvannisselroy6197  Instead of making childish insults, cite the words from the memorandum that requires the U.S. to protect Ukraine. It doesn’t exist.
    1
  32. @ Ukraine didn’t have operational control of the nukes, and it didn’t even want them. It didn’t have the funds to maintain them. Try doing a little research before commenting.
    1
  33.  @HermanWillems  The Gripen is huge on radar and wouldn’t survive against Russia.
    1
  34. @ All countries can control their technology. It’s not just the U.S. Countries do it all the time. It’s been going on for decades. Remember how France stopped delivering weapons to Israel in its fight for its very existence? Germany has done the same. This isn’t anything new.
    1
  35. @ You’re right about providing details, which you’re good at leaving out. The US sent the vast majorities of the missiles. Yes, many countries gave SAM batteries, but the US has had to actually expand production capabilities to keep up with Ukraine’s needs for Patriot missiles. Despite not having any obligation to help, the bottom line is that the U.S. has sent far more aid than any other country.
    1
  36. @ I agree with that. If they want to fund an unending war, then that’s on them.
    1
  37. @ You’ve read the memorandum, unlike so many others here who haven’t. Nice….
    1
  38.  @malcolmgibson5088  Why do you keep spreading misinformation? The Budget Memorandum says nothing about protecting or even helping Ukraine. It would be real easy for you to prove me wrong. Just cite in quotes the exact wording from the memorandum that requires the U.S. and Ukraine to help Ukraine. You can’t and you know it. The fact that you know that you’re lying tells me that even you know that you’re wrong.
    1
  39.  @malcolmgibson5088  Try doing some research before commenting, and maybe then you’ll have some credibility. The Washington Post discussion the memorandum in detail. Below is an excerpt from it. Unlike Article 5 of the NATO Charter, it does not require a specific response from the United States or others. So it’s worth a little history lesson. The agreement is not an official treaty. It is neither legally binding nor does it carry an enforcement mechanism. And while it provides security assurances, they do not include specific promises with regard to a potential invasion.
    1
  40. I hope you’re right, Jake!
    1
  41.  @maryginger4877  Figures are based on fake figures by Russia. You see know better by now than to trust what Russia says.
    1
  42. Unfortunately, the election wasn’t only about the war in Ukraine. In fact, it wasn’t even on the radar of talking points. If the war in Ukraine was the only issue, Kamala would have won no problem. I think the main problem for Kamala was the high grocery costs and large number of homeless, which the immigration problem didn’t help, either. I voted for Kamala solely because she supported Ukraine, but most people weren’t one-issue voters like me.
    1
  43. It’s Russia that had to go to North Korea for help. Ukraine still hasn’t mobilized men under 25. That says a long since Russia’s populations is much larger.
    1
  44. Numerous Russian S-400s have been destroyed. As far as I have seen, only a few Patriot launchers have been destroyed, not the entire operating system. And the S-400 is getting destroyed by what it’s supposed to be able to defeat.
    1
  45. If the election was only about Ukraine, Kamala would have won easily, but the election was about many internal problems that unfortunately took precedent over providing assistance..
    1
  46. I like Jake for his optimism that Ukraine will win. Sometimes he’s a little too optimistic, though. He’s been saying for years that Russia can’t sustain the same level of losses, and that the Russian economy would soon collapse. While I appreciate his optimism, after a while I begin to doubt his ability to make these kinds of predictions. He has a good heart, but I wish he’d scale back his predictions, and to stop making politically biased comments that clearly show he’s a left leaning democrat.
    1
  47.  @gawkthimm6030  That would be nice, but we both know that isn’t going to happen.
    1
  48.  @gawkthimm6030  Biden and Harris are too chicken to do anything like that. I’m sure there are foreign pilots who would volunteer, but I don’t see Biden allowing that to happen. He’s too afraid to “escalate” the situation.
    1
  49.  @tracboy80  I hope you’re right. Ukraine depends a lot on foreign aid. Germany already stated it won’t be providing as much as it has in the past, and depending on who is elected in the USA the aid can be possibly be reduced even further. The fact that Russia has to offer such high salaries to recruit new soldiers is telling that it’s having a hard time finding new cannon fodder.
    1
  50.  @richardlafave2556 You obviously haven’t read the Budapest Memorandum. Why do you make uninformed comments when it’s obvious you don’t know wtf you’re talking about?
    1