Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "After Trump's Pre-Inauguration Speech, Ukraine Admits Defeat? Kyiv Army Chief On Putin's Oreshnik" video.

Dear all Abduls, stop talking nonsense on the internet!
9
@ 1) The only one that is charged for kid napp ing youths is PutIer and his commissioner for children's right. 2) Yes, it was avoidable. PutIer could have chosen not to invade a sov ereign country just to ex p and his own country. 3) Put the blame where it belong, blame PutIer!
5
What's the crime? Defending his country against a brutal at tacker?? Yeah, that one would hold up in court!
4
@ Just facts! But as you say, you have the right to be ignorant and stu...
4
@ If you look closely, you would see two T's. But, that would perhaps be to much to ask for. One has to learn English to side with the truth??! How come?
4
Rule number 1: Don't make the same lame copy/paste jokes on SOME over and over. Rule number 2: Never forget rule number 1.
4
@bubamaranovichok4901 That Minsk you are referring to is called the Budapest Memorandums. Where Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan were giving security assurances from its signatories (Russia, UK and USA) to guarantee their sovereignty wouldn't be violated. In return Ukraine handed over all nuclear weapons. And now ru SSia has violated that agreement. Is it clear so far?
4
 @frenkihunter7523 Not the kind you would comprehend! ; )
3
@bubamaranovichok4901 A certain country invaded Crimea and Donbas instead to try to get control over Ukraine. They armed the separatists in Donbas and sent over 40.000 troops to start a w a r there. Starting to see the real picture? "It said, that Russia has the right to interfere in any former SU states …." You’re funny man, I’ll give you that!
3
A really, really mighty 3-day SMO!🤢🤣
3
@ Are you saying you don't understand yourself? Try a shrink!
2
@bubamaranovichok4901 The Budapest Memoranda: 1. Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act) 2. Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 3. Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.
2
@muckle8 No doubt in a ru SS ian mind. How strange!
2
@junixculajara777 Yeaaah, what do you think will happen then, genius?!!
2
@bubamaranovichok4901 Before 2014, the democratically elected government of Ukraine had negotiated an economic agreement with EU. It was a done deal and just awaited the president’s signature. The president went back on his promise to sign after pressure from ru SS ia. Of course the people of Ukraine wouldn’t have this undemocratically decision, corruption and interference from ru SS ia, so they protested. The president used snipers to shut of the protests, but the people wouldn’t budge. At the end, the Prez fled to Moscow. It is called “the Revolution of Dignity”. Is it clear so far?
1
@bubamaranovichok4901 The democraticaIIy eIected government of Ukraine had negotiated an economic agreement with EU. It was a done deal and just awaited the president’s signature. The president went back on his promise to sign after pressure from "a certain country". Of course the people of Ukraine wouldn’t have this undemocratic decision, corruption and interference from "a certain country", so they protested. The president used snipers to shut of the protests, but the people wouldn’t budge. At the end, the Prez fled to Mos cow. It is called “the RevoIution of Dignity”
1
@bubamaranovichok4901 4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used". 5. Not to use nuclear weapons against any non–nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state. 6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments. (its funny, I don't see "that ru SS ia has the right to interfere in any former SU states" in that agreement! ; )
1
@bubamaranovichok4901 It looks like PutIeristan Times censor this part, but I'll try again: In 2O14, the democraticaIIy eIected government of Ukraine had negotiated an economic agreement with the EU. All the president had to do was to sign the agreement. But instead he went back on his promise after pressure from "a certain country". Of course the peopIe of Ukraine wouldn’t have this undemocratic decision, corruption and interference from "this certain country", so they protested. The president used sharp sho oters to try to stop the protesters, but the people wouldn’t budge. At the end, the Prez fled to Mo SS cow.
1
It looks like PutIeristan Times censor this part, but I'll try again: In 2O14, the democraticaIIy eIected government of Ukraine had negotiated an economic agreement with the EU. All the president had to do was to sign the agreement. But instead he went back on his promise after pressure from "a certain country". Of course the peopIe of Ukraine wouldn’t have this undemocratic decision, corruption and interference from "this certain country", so they protested. The president used sharp sho oters to try to stop the protesters, but the people wouldn’t budge. At the end, the Prez fled to Mo SS cow.
1
It looks like PutIeristan Times censor this part, but I'll try again: A certain country tried a c ou p in Ukraine in 2014 (no, it wasn’t the US). They put pressure on the president to not sign an already done deal with the EU. This certain country was afraid to lose influence and control over Ukraine, but the people didn’t agree to this undemocratic and illegal move, so they protested. The result was that the president fled to mo SS cow.
1
@ "Ukraine have always been the aggressor". Yeah sure! They have always wanted to invade and conquer the biggest nuclear power on Earth.
1
@donaldapolala1271 We sure hope that all young Africans are not as pri miti ve as you. Then Africa will face a dark future.
1
@terrywedhorn ru SS ia needs to get out of Ukrainian land. NAT0 and ru SSia has always been on each other borders. What's the problem?!! PutIer, like Trump, is a leader who cares about himself only.
1
You take care of Zambia, one of the poorest countries in the world, then worry about the West later.
1