Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "Putin's Biggest Sign Of Action Soon: China's Sudden Move After Belarus; NATO Fears Kursk Revenge?" video.

There is a big difference in supporting the attacker compared to the defender! Some Ind'ans seem to have a very hard time understanding this.
15
Again? You guys have been talking about that for 900 days now! 😂
10
@NixsonJr NATO isn't expanding, but if they were, so f... what?
6
What did NATO do?
4
@user1qaz2wsx3edc And you think that is a great idea, even today?? I know the Ruz z'ans are still living in the Mid dle Ages, but ...
3
@user1qaz2wsx3edc NATO had no plans to put missiles in Ukraine.
2
@karunamaya Like i said, NAT0 is not expanding! The smaller neighboring countries to the mad fa sc'st state Ruz zia are seeking protection. If Ruz zia wasn't that aggressive, there would be no NAT0 "expanding".
2
Bravo for what??? To receive a Chinese envoy to meet Xi's lapdog Put ler and discuss an even greater price reduction on Ruz zian oil and gas?
1
Ruz zia had been attacked by the victim of the already 900 day (or 3800 days since 2014) failed Ruz zian attack?? What's your point exactly?
1
@user1qaz2wsx3edc And you agree that is a great thing? Still in the 21st century? I know that the Ruz zians are still living in the Middle Ages, but ....
1
@ДаниилДаниил-к1ы Индия в НАТО?? Это было для меня новостью!
1
@kylecduncan Yes of course, but this happened AFTER Putler's idiotic war of attack. And this clearly shows why smaller countries turn to NAT0 for protection against their aggr essive neighbour. There is only one aggressor here and we all know who that is.
1
@Aj-eb7ej "Nato had no plans?? Are you the chief of NATO??" ARE YOU?? ; ) "If it was EU membership it has been understood." Ruz zia went to w ar because Ukraine chose an economic relationship with EU over Ruz zia. "NATO had no plans to deploy missiles" Did NATo informed you in tiktok??" Did Kre ml'n inform you on Tiktok??
1
The result: Mangy bear with bad breath!
1