Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "Putin's Direct Nuclear Warning To NATO Ahead Of Vilnius Summit; 'Discuss Zaporizhzhia Nuke...'" video.

  1.  @howard5536  Forbes: President Zelensky Is Not A Billionaire. Despite social media reports claiming he’s a billionaire, Zelensky doesn’t come close to making Forbes’ global wealth rankings. His main asset: an estimated 25% stake in Kvartal 95, a group of companies that produce humorous shows. While he does own a flat in one of Ukraine’s most expensive apartment buildings in the center of Kyiv, it’s relatively modest by Western standards. Forbes estimates Zelensky’s entire real estate portfolio is worth $4 million. We estimate he and his wife Olena Zelenska share a bank account that holds roughly $2 million in cash and government bonds. Putin has robbed his country for 20 years now. His net worth is estimated to USD 20 Billion+ (20.000.000.000) and USD 2 Billion+ annual income. (his salary as president is USD 180.000)
    5
  2. It's nice to see a pro-Russian that admits that NATO isn't fighting. But you lost many friends with that statement.
    4
  3. If the Russians are afraid of escalation, just go home!
    3
  4. What about other countries's security?
    3
  5.  @SonicSwifty960  You still live in 1945? Congratulations!
    2
  6. It's quite the opposite. Putin say what will happen, then organize a false flag op. Then tell I told you so, mainly for the home crowd. And often has a element of "threat" to Russia. Like that, he will get more support for the war at home. Zelensky has absolutely nothing to gain by fixing a nuclear disaster at his home land. Putin on the other hand knows that the war is lost. He will just do some damage before he pulls out. Back home he can tell he stepped down because he wouldn't start WW3. Maybe then the Russian's will forgive him for losing.
    1
  7.  @TheManticora3  RUSSIA violated the Minsk agreements. The dam was designed to withstand almost any attack imaginable — from the outside. Ask yourselves who was in control of the dam. The evidence suggests Russia blew it up from within. In the chaotic aftermath, with each side blaming the other for the collapse, multiple explanations are theoretically possible. But the evidence clearly suggests the dam was crippled by an explosion set off by the side that controls it: Russia. Ihor Strelets, an engineer who served as the deputy head of water resources for the Dnipro River, said that as a Cold War construction project, the dam’s foundation was designed to withstand almost any kind of external attack . “I do not want my theory to be correct,” Mr. Strelets said. A large explosion in the gallery might mean the total loss of the dam. “But that is the only explanation,” he said.
    1
  8.  @user-ss5bm1wl6j  "Did u mean USSR." Why should he mean that? "in 2K19 ur clown zelensky said that we will not join IN NATO". IF he said that, what's the problem?
    1
  9.  @NotConfuzed  You really are ConfuZed!
    1