Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "Desperate Zelensky Asks NATO To Help End War In 1-2 Months: No Weapons Left After Kursk Failure?" video.
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dragand.5581 Arakha miia, the chief negotiator, denied that the Ukrainian delegation was ready to sign such a document, and that Johnson forced Kyiv’s hand. According to him, the delegation did not even have the legal right to sign anything – this could only theoretically happen at a meeting of Zelenskyy and Putin. He added that Western partners knew about the negotiations and saw drafts of documents, but did not attempt to make a decision for Ukraine, but rather gave advice.“
" there was no confidence in the Rus sians, because they were ready to promise anything. ... Secondly, there was no confidence in the Rus sians that they would do it. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, everyone would relax, and then they would [in vade] even more prepared. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty.“ But discussions were interrupted after Rus sian tr00ps withdrew from Kyiv, revealing the extent of cr'mes committed, notably the B uc ha ma ssa cre. The to rtu re and murder of innocent civi lians.
1
-
@dragand.5581 A statement by more than 3OO historians who study gen oc ide, Naz ism and World War II said Putin’s rhetoric about de-Naz ifying among Ukraine’s elected leadership is “pr op aga nda.”
“We strongly reject the Rus sian government’s cynical abuse of the term gen oci de, the memory of World War II and the Hol ocaust, and the equation of the Ukrainian state with the Na zi regime to justify its unprovoked aggression,” the statement says.
“This rhetoric is factually wrong, morally repugnant and deeply offensive to the memory of millions of victims of Na zism and those who courageously fought against it, including Ru ssian and Ukrainian soldiers of the Red Army.
“Neo-Na zi, far right and xenophobic groups do exist in Ukraine, like in pretty much any other country, including Rus sia”. “They are vocal and can be prone to violence but they are numerically small, marginal and their political influence at the state level is non-existent. That is not to say that Ukraine doesn’t have a far-right problem. It does. But we would consider neo-Na zi groups IN RUS SIA A MUCH BIGGER problem and threat than the Ukrainian far right.”
1
-
1
-
@dragand.5581 The Ukrainian chief negotiator denied that the Ukrainian delegation was ready to sign such a document, and that Joh nson forced Kyiv’s hand. According to him, the delegation did not even have the legal right to sign anything – this could only theoretically happen at a meeting of Zele nskyy and Pu tin. He added that Western partners knew about the negotiations and saw drafts of documents, but did not attempt to make a decision for Ukraine, but rather gave advice.“ " there was no confidence in the Rus sians, because they were ready to promise anything. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, relax, and then they would [in va de] even more prepared. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty.“ But discussions were interrupted after Rus si an troo ps withdrew from Kyiv, revealing the extent of cr'm es comm'tted, notably the B uc ha mas sa cre. The to rtu re and mu rder of innocent civi li ans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
WoWa-C Ukraines negotiater Arakh amiia denied that the Ukrainian delegation was ready to sign such a document, and that Johnson forced Kyiv’s hand. According to Arakha miia, the delegation did not even have the legal right to sign anything – this could only theoretically happen at a meeting of Zelensky and Pu tin. Ara khamiia added that Western partners knew about the negotiations and saw drafts of documents, but did not attempt to make a decision for Ukraine, but rather gave advice.“ More of what he said, When asked why Ukraine did not agree to this point, Arakh amia replied that there was no confidence in the Russ ians, because they were ready to promise anything. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, relax, and then they would [inv ade] even more prepared. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty.“ But discussions were interrupted after Rus sian troops withdrew from Ky iv, revealing the extent of cr'm es com mitted, notably the B uc ha ma ssa cre. The to rtu re and mu rder of innocent civi li ans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1