Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "Ukraine 'Fails' To Break Russian Defences In Donetsk | Watch Western Artillery Bite The Dust" video.
-
10
-
7
-
3
-
@sandycaspillo6731 You didn't answer the question, are you against super powers invading smaller countries? Or are you just a hypocrite?
"Who invaded more countries?" I haven't counted, you tell me! But here is a few:
Chuvasia, Ingusetia, Kalmykia, Tartarstan, Chechnya, Dagestan, Mordvina, Udmurtia, Mari, Tsjerkessia, ossetia, Komi, Bashkiria, Sahka, Khanty, Turkestan, Yakutia, Bukhara, Khiva, North Ingria, Buryatia, Georgia, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Bukovina, Tuva, East Prussia, Hungary, Transnistria, Romania,Yugoslavia, Albania, Bulgaria, Ukraine, East Germany, Korea, Austria, Czechoslovakia, Northern Caucasus, Kuril Islands, Afghanistan
3
-
2
-
@Faiez-rh1gm If Russia is so concerned over poor countries, why do he only give 25.000 - 50.000 tons of grain to Africa? Last year Ukraine exported 19.000.000 metric tons of grain to developing countries. And why don't he offer grain to the World Food Program, who delivers grain to the most needed countries?
Since 2021, the U.S. Government has helped close more than 900 deals across 47 African countries for a total estimated value of $22 billion in two-way trade and investment. As the Administration’s flagship infrastructure initiative, the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) is helping to advance and scale several of these public and private investments across the continent.
U.S. national security adviser: "The U.S. will commit $55 billion to Africa over the course of the next three years, across a wide range of sectors, to tackle the core challenges of our time," Sullivan said. "These commitments build on the United States' long-standing leadership and partnership in development, economic growth, health and security in Africa."
So far in 2023, The U.S. has provided more than 4 billion USD on humanitarian aid to Africa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jackb0203 I believe the war in Iraq was wrong (at least badly implemented). But it's not comparable to this war.
There was UN Security Counsel resolution (1441) to give Iraq a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations.
The most important text of Resolution 1441 was to require that Iraq "shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect". However, on January 27, 2003, Hans Blix, the lead member of the UNMOVIC, said that, "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament that was demanded of it".
Blix noted that Iraq had failed to cooperate in a number of areas, including the failure to provide safety to U-2 spy planes that inspectors hoped to use for aerial surveillance, refusal to let UN inspectors into several chemical, biological, and missile sites on the belief that they were engaging in espionage rather than disarmament, submitting 12,000-page arms declaration that it handed over in December 2002, which contained little more than old material previously submitted to inspectors, and failure to produce convincing evidence to the UN inspectors that it had unilaterally destroyed its anthrax stockpiles as required by resolution 687 a decade before 1441 was passed in 2002. On March 7, 2003, Blix said that Iraq had made significant progress toward resolving open issues of disarmament but the cooperation was still not "immediate" and "unconditional" as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1441. He concluded that it would take "but months" to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks. The US government observed this as a breach of resolution 1441 because Iraq did not meet the requirement of "immediate" and "unconditional" compliance.
1