Comments by "R Johansen" (@rjohansen9486) on "As Russia Takes More Land, UK Announces 'Largest-Ever' Military Aid For Ukraine, Days After US Move" video.

Is dealing in weapons prohibited?
6
russia has lost over 350.000 troops in total, gained 0.08% of Ukraine in the last six months, and NATO hasn't even turned up!!😂
4
759 Rubles? So you have to work 6 months to afford that cake?
4
Could it be their illegal war against a neighboring country and their war crimes?
3
@paulcauchi7874 What is the latest news from Putinistan?
2
@stanspb763 "Russia stated" and what russia actually wants are two different things. "Demilitarize Ukraine". Russia has of course no right to demilitarize another country. "eliminate the Nazis". Then they have to go to war against themselves. russia has a lot more nazis than other countries. Like I said, NATO has not turned up yet. How can they be inferior? Ukraine is not being used by US to threaten russia. russia has by its own imperialistic dream/goals, attacked Ukraine and stealing their land. Everyone knows these facts, except the most fanatic putler fans!
1
@stanspb763 More nazis in russia than in other countries and demilitarizing a sovereign country is of course not in russia's right. No one has been threatening russia, but russia has not just threatened, but even attacked another country and are bombing/missiling their cities. And like I said, NATO has not even turned up. But yes, of course they are aiding the defender with weapons and munition.
1
Perhaps they do, even if it's not published by HT?
1
@GouverneurNL "The phrase "illegal war" is utterly meaningless." Yes, for people like you!!
1
@aAverageFan According to me, yes! But those two wars are not comparable at all. Russia is fighting an imperialistic war to gain land. "United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a United Nations Security Council resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolutions 660, 661, 678, 686, 687, 688, 707, 715, 986, and 1284).[1] It provided a legal justification for the subsequent US-led invasion of Iraq.[2][3][4] Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
1
@aAverageFan According to me, yes! But some means this justifies the war: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 is a resolution adopted unanimously by the United Nations Security Council on 8 November 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions provided a legal justification for the subsequent US-led invasion of Iraq. Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to weapons of mass destruction, but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate Kuwait for the widespread looting conducted by its troops during the 1990–1991 invasion and occupation. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations."
1
 @Nasim.8736 Even lesser than people like you? I doubt it very much!😂
1
@BalrajTakhar-u7u Funny that you should mention Donbas and Luhansk. The sham referendums are only recognized by dictator states like N Korea, Syria and Venezuela. What does that tell you?
1
@Nasim.8736 We all know who is the lesser people. You demonstrate that quite well, I'll give you that! ; )
1
@Nasim.8736 Lambo and Bentley? What other wet dreams do you have?😂
1
@Nasim.8736 "south Asian British Muslims have bought ....." .... and still you can't have a hard *n!
1
@Nasim.8736 "They sit at number 1 too". But you are most fond of nr. 2?😂
1
@Nasim.8736 BTW, you didn't answer what other wet dreams you have. We know you like lambo's and lada's, but what about women? Or do camels and goats suit your needs better?
1
@behramdastur1061 Yes, the russian society is very corrupt!
1