Comments by "Ponto" (@Ponto-zv9vf) on "Is This What Jesus REALLY Looked Like?" video.

  1. No, a fisher of men.
    2
  2. I see an old, weak man not any type of Jesus.
    2
  3. Not really. When the Neolithic people who depended on Wheat and Barley in bread, their teeth were rather bad. It's carbohydrates not just sugar. Also flour was made by grinding grains with stone mills. That is not to mean he had really bad teeth as shown by that bigot.
    2
  4. It is more probably the kiss thing was due to the writer not knowing what Jesus looked like, so not description just an action, a kiss. Can you imagine, Jesus is the one with crossed eyes and a pock marked face.
    2
  5. Race isn't about skin color except in the USA. That man is a bigot because for him White excludes lots of people who are not of European origin from the Northwest Europe. That is why West Eurasian is used because it excludes the notion that some peoples have of what a White person is. And Jesus was West Eurasian.
    1
  6. I have never seen the actor Brian Blessed without a beard, and it's the same type of beard. It isn't the existence of Jesus that is questioned, it's his godhood, it is easier to go for for Jesus didn't exist than his godhood. My idea is that Jesus had black hair, tan skin, black beard, looked Middle Eastern, but blue eyed. Blue eyes are not uncommon among West Eurasians, and being Middle Eastern does not mean being a negro or a South Asian or some South Pacific Islander i.e Black. That man is biased. Baldness is a West Eurasian thing, not just European or some type of Jewish man. Jeffrey Hunter was American, Max von Sydow was Swedish, so what British Jesus.
    1