Comments by "Life\x27s Adventures" (@bigphillyed) on "Philadelphia Police Violated Their Own Guidelines, Here's How | Visual Investigations" video.

Hahah go back to mommys basement. These were violent protestors conducting criminal activity in the downtown portion of Philadelphia. These snowflakes think that because they didnt hit someone, doesn't mean you are not violent. Destroying property, stopping interstate commerce, preventing citizens from freedom of movement are 'violent protests'. No lawyer would even think about taking on a case like this. As the officers are well within the boundaries of the law.
25
Was it heartbreaking watching all the property damage they did that taxpayers now have to pay to fix? Was it heartbreaking at all the scared law abiding citizens trapped in their cars on an interstate highway? Was it heartbreaking when a mob stopped important and valuable products from being delivered? Was it heartbreaking when they created a dangerous and hazardous environment for the public and themselves? They all should have been arrested, sent to jail for 30 days and given a $5000 fine.
9
@BrotherEDEN are you blind? These people were lawful and peaceful till the second they entered the highway. Entering the highway on foot as pedestrians is illegal, and there is a very good common sense reason why. Then this mob of animals began to destroy property, threaten citizens stuck in cars, stop the flow of interstate commerce, and so much more. Yet you are trying to justify their criminal behavior and say its not okay for police to disburse this mob of people breaking the law. How can you be so naive and foolish?
7
@yourmommashouse no, you misunderstood the department guidelines. A mob of people breaking the law such as this mob, constitutes a violent protest authorizing the use of non-lethal force. The officer did not violate any department standards on use of force. The second that mob entered an interstate highway, destroyed public property, threatened law abiding citizens on the highway. They became criminals and created a violent environment which allowed for the use of tear gas and pepper spray. You need to read the deaprtment policies for yourself and stop listening to some biased journalist. The department guidlines clearly authorize the use of crowd control methods to dsiburse the crowd.
6
How is it horrifying? There is hundreds of criminals and the police need to disburse them to protect the public. Would you have rather they used force to subdue and arrest everyone of them?
5
Fun fact, no it isnt.
5
They were protecting citizens. They were protecting the safety and rights of the law abiding citizens trying to carry put their daily duties. Stopping an interstate highway is illegal, period. Destroying public and federal property is illegal. Thus this was NOT a peaceful protest, it was a violent riot.
5
@Reinnadesu you failed to understand what he said. He said "tear gas is forbiden in war". When that isnt true. I am not subjective in any way, I read the law, its balck and whitw and it isnt subjective. Tear gas is not allowed in direct combat between two nations militaries, but if i occupy a national or region and i must control the citizens of that nation i can use tear gas against the citizens. Tear gas cannot be used as a use of "warfare"! Understanding the laws and words is not subjective, its the law and the truth. I replied to exactly what he said. You are the one being subjective completely.
4
@Koya550 I don't even watch fox News. But nice try! Someone speaks the truth and you immedistely dismiss it.
4
The only threat to society was a few hundred wanna be SJW's breaking the law and threatening the safety of the law abiding citizens. The only threat to society here is a mob of terrorists blocking interstate travel and commerce.
3
@mburnett93 you need to read the articles you represent. Because tear gas, cannot be used as a method of "warfare". Crowd control in an occupied zone such as a protest in Bagdad is NOT a method of warfare. It is a crowd control! So again another liberal who thinks he knows everything. Almost every nation in the world uses tear gas for crowd control, riots and unlwaful demonstrations. If that is the case then how is it unlawful? This mob was an unlawful crowd, tear gas is completely legal to use.
3
@Reinnadesu I never brought police into anything! He said tear gas is not allowed in war, and that is not the truth. Tear gas was used in Afghanistan against militants, is that war? Tear gas is used by every nation. Read the actual international law on the use of tear gas during war. You will find his comment completely untrue after reading the law.
3
kettling?
3
@Koya550 you are the A typical liberal. No one said anything about ultra violent antifa anything. You show me one police guidleine that says the police must leave a route to exit. Because basic riot training teaches you to migrate unlawful protestors into a confined area where they can be arrested. In this instance, officers pushed the terrorists into an area that they did escape from. So your not leaving them a way out theory, is just ridiculous ways of trying to justify what they did. The bottom line, they weren't peaceful, they were unlawful and created a dangerous environment for other citizens. Nothing justifies a mob of kids to break laws and then complain about how the police handled it. Grow up.
3
@gnarlytothemax wait, you want to hold officers families responible for the actions of the officers for generations? You are such an immature, childish, liberal fool! First of all, the officers did nothing wrong. They didn't break the law, they didnt violate department policy. They reacted to the violent protestors, the laws they were breaking and the danger to the public they created. Stop being so naive!
3
How is it inhumane? These were violent criminals in the streets. The police were forced to use non-lethal force to disburse these domestic terrorists. Dont wanna be exposed to tear gas, pepper spray and rubber bullets? Then don't break the law.
3
@Epic0Studios how was any of those protestors lives given up? They weren't. There is nothing you can say that justifies criminal activity by a mob. As a society we must follow the laws that law makers create that we elected. Because a minority group of people are mad about an event in america, doesnt give them the right to break the law or threaten the safety of law abiding citizens that do not agree with them. Was it heartbreaking the fear this mob instilled on other citizens stuck on that highway? You cannot in anyway justify the criminal activity of this angry mob of people. How else were the police supposed to disburse this crowd? Oh wait, i know your gonna say that criminals have the right to protest and effect other peoples lives because ots for a so called good cause. The old greater good theory. Well the majority of america do NOT agree or condone unlawful protesting that damages property or scares other citizens.
3
@mburnett93 wait a second, I am heartless for demanding an angry mob of criminals be disbursed. So you encourage lawlessness, you encourage mob rule? You encourage the destruction of property. But when the police disburse the crowd with non-lethal force, its wrong. SMH.
2
@christopherspecht2660 oh really, a peaceful way of disbusing a mob of criminals. Why dont you educatw us on the "peaceful" methods of disbursing a crowd. Because when the police were trying to stop them from entering the interstate, they just walked right by. So please tell us, where they supposed to stand there and talk to them? Where they supposed to block them from, entering the highway? I really would like to hear ypur peaceful plan?
2
@HaleyClaire I see, you cannot handle the truth. When faced with it, you become triggered. Typical childish behavior.
2
So you favor the criminal activity of a mob, over the public safety of law abiding citizens? You feel property destruction and stopping people and commerce from freely moving is okay? What about the fear they created for drivers stuck on that interstate? All of that is okay, but the police using non-lethal measures to disburse an unlawful mob of people is wrong. Your ideologies are what is wrong with this country, not the police.
2
@lucaslouzada44 I never said peaceful protestors were criminals. I said an angry mob that was destroying public property, stopping law abiding citizens from freely moving, stopping the transportation of interstate commerce, entering an interstate highway on foot and creating a dangerous situation are criminal acts. Thus the angry mob of criminals in this video should have been disbursed. I honestly would rather have seen them all locked up put in the city jail for 30 days and a $5000 fine. But the police legally disbursing them with non-lethal force is probably the most civilized manner to handle it. What happens if one of the people stuck in a car had an urgent doctors appointment, is it okay to stop them from getting there? What happens if someone with a heart condition had a heart attack because of the stress and fear? Is all that okay because a mob of angry kids want to protest? I never judged anyone, I watched the video and saw the crimes being committed. In your eyes its okay to break the law if your protesting, well sorry thats not how a civilized society works. Grow up.
2
@ro_pandablox9081 what anyone that encourages legal peaceful protests is a trump supporter? You encourage lawlessness during protests?
2
Support what actions? The police should be supported for protecting the law abiding citizens of Philadelphia. This angry mob of criminals and thugs should have all been arrested. They got off easy!
2
@TimmyVision the truth scares you, so much you stalk my entire YouTube channel. Grow up and move out of mommys basement.
2
What disbursing an angry mob of criminals is showing some kind of colors? You encourage lawlessness over the public safety of law abiding citizens? This was a mob of angry criminals, they should have all been arrested in my opinion and sent to jail for a month. They got off easy!
1
@markfart127 and what do you remember? Is that suppose to scare me? You're just another keyboard tough guy threatening people on YouTube. I'm here if you wanna come talk, I assure you won't like the outcome.
1
@christopherspecht2660 wait a second, did you watch the same video I did? So destroying public property, stopping law abiding citizens from freely traveling on an interstate, stopping the transportation of interstate commerce, entering a highway is lawful behavior? If your break the law, the police have every right to use non-lethal force to protect the people of Philadelphia. The last time i checked police enforce laws made by lawmakers elected by the people. The police are not supposed to deliver justice, they enforce it. The law says you cannot destroy property, you cannot walk on a highway, you cannot stop other citizens from moving freely. Yet you believe all that is okay if the mob of criminals doesn't physically attack anyone. What about the guy swinging at a police officer?
1
Okay, so an angry mob of lawless people should be allowed to destroy public property, stop the free movement of law abiding citizens and commerce? The second those children stepped on to the insterstate they were breaking the law and endangering drivers and themselves. But you feel all that is okay, and you feel the police shouldn't be allowed to stop them. Do i have that right?
1
There is no change needed, dont break the law and pu won't have a problem. Pretty simple solution.
1
carlos Rivas well said kind sir?
1
You're absolutely right, it is unacceptable for a mob of angry violent criminals to damage public property, stop interstate commerce and stop themfree movement of law abiding citizens. Not to mention the dangerous conditions they created with their actions. They all should have been arrested, sentenced to 30 days in jail and $5000 dollar fine.
1
What part of that mob was peaceful? None of it! They were breaking the law, and should have all been arrested. They got off easy with some tear gas and pepper spray.
1
@TimmyVision they are not criminals, did you not watch any of that video? Property damage, attacking drivers and police, blocking traffic, blocking people from free movement. All illegal, they are criminals. What's the definition of a criminal? Stfu then.
1
@kathylewis2484 so your saying no one in that crowd used violence or broke a law? You are so naive, when it fits your agenda. And they are instilling fear into drivers on the highway for political gain, the exact definition of a terrorist. The fact you cannot even understand basic English and vocabulary tells me everything I need to know about you.
1
Maybe they shouldn't be breaking the law!
1
Oh lord, you win the daily darwin award for stupidity. First of all what military force was used? The military doesn't use tear gas and pepper spray, they use guns and bullets. What person was murdered for exercising their 1st amendment rights? The only person murders for the 1st amendment rights was the kid shot and killed in CHAZ in Seattle. Of which was shot by another protestor. The only disease in this country, is liberalism and entitlement from these children throwing temper tantrums in the streets. You are the real propblem in this country!
1