Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Limbaugh: Oprah's Racist Encounter Was Because She's FAT" video.

  1. ...assuming the progressives you encounter in the YouTube comment section makes a good approximation of all progressives... am I right?
    1
  2. Your first point is plain nonsense, and your second point is pretty much what I just said.
    1
  3. Your opinion, yes, but what I'm interested in is how you formed that opinion. Is it just a primitive impulse, or do you have a rational basis for your opinion? You hint that it has something to do with feces. Then I must inform you that not all homosexual male couples practice anal sex, and ask you whether you dislike heterosexual couples who practice anal sex as much, and ask you what you think of homosexual males who don't have anal intercourse.
    1
  4. Again you use subjective terms that can be interpreted many ways. Non-standard and non-regular is not necessarily something negative. Insane is usually defined as abnormal behavior patterns, so that means we're back to square one. Look, my point is that there's not necessarily anything negative about being out of the ordinary. There must be some other reason for your contempt.
    1
  5. Oprah cries like a baby because she was treated like an ordinary customer. Pathetic. I hate that bitch, even more than Limbaugh.
    1
  6. Not necessarily. His insult rather relies on the presumption that you are homophobic.
    1
  7. What do you mean by "normal"? That homosexuality is uncommon?
    1
  8. My point was that no, he mustn't. He may also believe that you think it's shameful, and will thus be offended. If I want to offend someone I try to identify what they would be offended by, not what I would be offended by. But of course, there is the possibility that he is indeed homophobic and is stupid enough to assume everyone else think like him.
    1
  9. I still don't see a clear basis for your contempt. Can you give me an argument why homosexuality is something negative?
    1