Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Racist's Receipt Goes Viral, Waitress Suspended" video.

As I clearly stated, I wasn't quoting you, I was paraphrasing, and the intent was to fit your suggestions and my responses into one comment rather than committing a straw man. The definitions you provide here are conflicting with your suggestions in that they both require intent and the death or destruction of the group. The focus of my responses was on whether your suggestions had clear causal relationship with the death or destruction of the group, so let's save the matter of intent for later.
1
Noel Ignatiev: "What we hate is a system that confers privileges (and burdens) on people because of their color. It's not fair skin that makes people white; it's fair skin in a certain kind of society, one that attaches social importance to skin color. When we say we want to abolish the white race, we do not mean we want to exterminate people with fair skin. We mean that we want to do away with the social meaning of skin color, thereby abolishing the white race as a social category."
1
Regarding Sontag's quote it seem it is from 1967, and it was paraphrased. She said: "Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history." It is to this day considered one of her most controversial statement. And I can't find anyone of significance called "Fernando Pena".
1
Also, no, "racist" isn't a scientific term, but neither is this a scientific paper. As long as you and I know whom I refer to there's no reason to bitch about it. If you have a term that better describes yourself and your likes who have this irrational fear of pigmentation I'm willing to use that from here on. Good night.
1
"For most of what you said, that's what the evidence shows" Nevermind the malleability aspect of intelligence, shitty social mobility, their history, the presence of people with a mindset like yours working against them, and those who despite this succeed.
1
"You are a robot. We are men." I take your ideology does not attract a lot of women. Oh the sweet irony if all this hate ultimately led your own extinction through the means of virginity. If you want to ensure your place in the gene pool, get busy loving!
1
How will the "White Genocide" take place? (paraphrasing) • "Demonize white identity" - Genocide how? • "Argue that whites deserve to die" - Not at all commonplace. • "Racial mixing" - White fertility rate is hardly affected and potential interbreeding is consensual. • "Celebrate non-white identity" - Are you fucking kidding me? • "Double standards race taboo" - Genocide how? • "Reverse discrimination" - Genocide how? • "Ridicule racists [I assume]" - Genocide how?
1
Assuming these quotes fairly represent the intended meaning of the authors, these does still not make such opinions "commonplace" unless they had a generally positive reception. This I doubt. These people are likely receiving less support than their pale counterparts. I believe they are of the same material as yourself, and deserve equal opposition.
1
There, you have proven you can also be witty, now do you have any serious proposals?
1
1&4 - The practice and acceptance of such double standards relies on the premise of a skewed power balance and will lose its legitimacy over time assuming the balance is restored. 2 - See my response to your examples. 3 - "racial mixing" was my attempt to cut down "flooding all white countries with non-whites" because I could see no other mechanism by which that would lead to the "destruction" of whites, and then I addressed the element of consent, which you failed to respond to.
1
I was of course referring to the reception of the specific quotes, and not their entire person. Although such statements are serious and should not be overlooked, they do not simply disqualify everything the person have done and will do.
1
"...because you are so full of blind hate." How about some introspection?
1
Hush! I'm baiting for debate.
1
1&4 - Don't fall off your chair now, but perhaps the reason why countries who implement such laws are perceived as less "racist" is because it works? And perhaps the act of offering minorities this extra protection does in itself contribute to the country being perceived as less "racist"?
1
6&7 - /wiki/Reverse_discrimination Again, this was an attempt to summarize, not to misrepresent. Again I must refer to the perceived overdog-underdog relationship that is the reason behind this kind of discrimination being referred to as "reverse". While I still find it hard to see how this would lead to genocide, I also believe it is false. You may find a few anecdotes of non whites being favored by the legal system to base your reality on, but I mean, look at ratio of the prison population.
1
3 - Well ironically the Aboriginals already had their homeland "flooded", and don't even pretend the treatment they endured is even remotely comparable to the current situation of whites in America. And by "crowding out" I guess you mean massive immigration until the original population is in minority and is assimilated? I would argue that despite integration efforts, the risk of the immigrants being assimilated before they reach majority is far greater.
1
If you knew anything about the psychology of hatred, you would know that it does not couple well with having a sober understanding of reality. Since hatred is incompatible with empathy, the less you know about the object of your hatred the more likely it is to develop, and it blurs and skews your perception in order to circumvent it.
1
Wow, that was random. You objected to my use of "racist" and so I asked you to offer a less loaded alternative. The part about pigmentation was just an attempt to be witty really. No need to get your panties all in a bunch over that.
1