Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Mark Wahlberg 9/11 Hijackers Apology" video.

@wellifthemediasaysit Of course not. I know damn well that no matter how rediculous your theories come off, there can never be enough evidence and rebuttals for you to change your position. Because you are a seeker of truth who always keep your mind open. btw: you seriously think someone pays me to do this? Haha. How cute!
2
@BeautyBoyTV Ofcourse they would still do it. They'd been in heaven having sex with virgins by the time US started killing civilians.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit WTC7: Fell because of structural damage and fires. Why does it matter how it fell? PNAC: The attack was convenient for the goals of some... so? Thermite: You see nanothermite cutting through steel beams. I see some blurry sparks coming out of an intensely burning building. NORAD: The 10 minute referense was taken from an instruction manual to an air plane simulation program. The only comparable domestic interception is that of Payne Stewart's plane which took 76 minutes.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit "3 steel towers turning to dust in mid air within seconds" What is the alternative? First tower start collapsing but magically stop half way. Second tower tip over like a tree. And the last just burn until there's an untouched steel skeleton left. Why do you think the conspirers was so desperate about taking the towers down? They needed space for a new Casino?
1
@wellifthemediasaysit Why would I need to explain away any coincidences when I've refered you to a website that does? I'm not gonna sit here and copy paste full pages of information in the comment section of a youtube video.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit Can you at least admit that your conspiracy theories lose credibility by relying heavily on evidence that are taken out of context, misrepresenting and downright fabrication.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit You can start by watching this compilation of 43 clips featuring Flight 175 flying into the south tower from different angles and distances. watch?v=NpUKM0MFNaM Then you can begin the job of contacting whitnesses and confirming their accounts, which I kid you not, will be the most embarrassing thing you've done in your life. Lakshman Achutan, Stephen Atha, Daniel Bang, Rich Bautista, Mark Belair, John Bloom, Jennifer Bodner, Jena Bridges, Richard and Cathy Brown, etc.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit To 9/11 mastermind: "Sir, the explosives we placed in secret were successfully triggered, we're just waiting for the termite to melt the iron. We've bribed or evacuated all whitnesses within 15 miles of WTC, hired and bribed actors for faked reactions, shot the explosion from 42 angles and distances and added after effects to make it look like a plane crashes into the tower..." "...we got one problem though: We forgot to add textures to the CGI airplane model." Seriously?
1
@wellifthemediasaysit If you can't find the evidence against your conspiracy then you haven't looked for it. Good luck living in your bubble. Some day you'll grow up to realize how gullible you once were.
1
@manonthemount If you'd taken the time to actually visit the website I linked, you'd notice it was dedicated to debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories. In fact you wouldn't even need visit it to come to that conclusion. All you needed was to read the comment I was responding to, which's author's position could have been assumed solely by taking an extra look at his username "wellifthemediasaysit". Fail.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit There are reasonable evidence against most of the conspiracy theories you suggested. All you have to do is to look for it. If -after you've reviewed that evidence- you insist on the conspiracies... please explain to me how the evidence is deficient.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit Racism? Haha wtf? I definately didn't see that one coming. Anyway, isn't it clear that I'm trying to spread the truth about 9/11 too? It's just that I'm actually looking for the truth rather than the excitement from trying to unravelling a secret conspiracy of the puppet masters of the world.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit So, what's the plot? Government plan a false flag op on US soil: Placing explosives/thermite in wtc1,2&7; hijack and fly planes into wtc1&2; then take down wtc7 and hope no one will notice; crash another plane to the ground; send a cruise missile into pentagon; manipulate the crime scene to make it look like it was a plane which did it; then bribe thousands of whitness including firefighters, ambulanse personel, police, engineers, pyrotechnicians etc to give false accounts?
1
@wellifthemediasaysit You might wanna take a look at this website: debunking911 . com If you think they make stuff up, conveniently they have provided source information so that you can follow up on suspicious evidence.
1
@wellifthemediasaysit No plane: Stupidest theory ever. Not one eye whitness claimed to have seen a cruise missile. All air planes. Although one guy said the plane flew into the building "like a cruise missile", which have been frequently quoted out of context. And the fact that the wings of the airplane cut down lampposts on it's way into the building visible in several images should make a clear statement that it indeed was an airplane. Or did some elves cut em down without anyone noticing?
1
@wellifthemediasaysit I've gone through a pile of supposed evidence and no, the 9-11 attacks was not an inside job. Stop browsing psuedo-science websites and documentaries and you'll be better off.
1