Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Freddie Sayers and Konstantin Kisin: What happened to Tucker Carlson?" video.

I honestly have trouble seeing what line Tucker supposedly crossed. The objections of Konstantin seems to boil down to that the interview benefited Putin more than the west.
211
Better a soft interview than no interview in my opinion.
20
@jackeagleeye3453 Tucker didn't ask important questions? Ukraine war, the road to peace, NATO, prospects of invading Poland, prisoned journalist, Nordstream pipeline, ..., are these unimportant topics?
3
@terencedonohoe9123 It's true that there wasn't much new in the interview, at least for those who consider information outside of legacy news. I got the sense that Putin strategically relied mainly on facts which are verifiable by western sources, such as to avoid dismissal. The documents he gave Tucker probably relates to some of the more controversial aspects of history he referred to.
1
@jackeagleeye3453 JFK, RFK werent assassinated? Censor of "misinformation" is free speech? In USA speech is allowed as long as it is not potent. The moment it unites people in opposition of the establishment, freedom meets resistance.
1