Comments by "TaichiStraightlife" (@TaichiStraightlife) on "GZERO Media" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5.  @zackwang9314  You have no idea what you're on about; there was no US involvement in the 1978 coup. The Soviets invaded Afghanistan to support their aligned communist allies and against the will of the people controlled it in a very bloody manner for a period of time. "The soldiers' knock on the door in the middle of the night, so common in many Arab and African countries, was little known in Afghanistan, where a central government simply lacked the power to enforce its will outside of Kabul. Taraki's coup changed all that. Between April 1978 and the Soviet invasion of December 1979, Afghan communists executed 27,000 political prisoners at the sprawling Pul-i-Charki prison six miles east of Kabul. Many of the victims were village mullahs and headmen who were obstructing the modernization and secularization of the intensely religious Afghan countryside. By Western standards, this was a salutary idea in the abstract. But it was carried out in such a violent way that it alarmed even the Soviets." — Robert D. Kaplan, Soldiers of God: With Islamic Warriors in Afghanistan and Pakistan They were finally forced to leave by the Mujaheddin, and yes at that time the US did give some clandestine aid to the Mujaheddin to help throw the Soviets out. Prior to that, the Saur Revolution or coup started the process by which internecine communists fought each other for years, which finally brought in the Soviets WHICH FIRST CAUSED THE RISE OF THE MUJAHEDDIN OR JIHADIS... and who are once again in control of that bloody nation. My memories of Afghanistan date back to 1974 when I was last there, which was after King Zahir Shah had already been deposed while in Italy by his cousin Daoud Khan. The Saur Revolution and alternatively called the April Revolution or April Coup, was the process by which the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) overthrew Afghan President Mohammed Daoud Khan on 27–28 April 1978, who had himself taken power in the 1973 Afghan coup d'état. Daoud Khan and most of his family were killed at the presidential palace by military officers in support of the PDPA. The revolution resulted in the creation of a Soviet-aligned government with Nur Muhammad Taraki as President (General Secretary of the Revolutionary Council). Saur or Sowr is the Dari (Persian) name of the second month of the Solar Hijri calendar, the month in which the uprising took place The revolution was ordered by PDPA member Hafizullah Amin, who would become a significant figure in the revolutionary government; at a press conference in New York in June 1978, Amin claimed that the event was not a coup but a revolution by the "will of the people". The coup involved heavy fighting and resulted in many deaths. The Saur Revolution was a significant event in Afghanistan's history, marking the onset of 43 years of conflict in the country. In short, communist terror: People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan. Look to the Soviets of that time if you want to apportion blame. Of course, since China is a country ruled by a communist party dictatorship, I imagine you won't do that at all, so again I waste my time in trying to school you.
    1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. JD Vance is never correct, because he always lies. He has no standing to talk about Free Speech because Free Speech is penalized that very same day in the White House, where the AP (Associate Press) was penalized for not using "Gulf of America", trump's bizarre and abrupt re-invention of the Gulf of Mexico. Instead continuing to use the common name that has stood the test of time for 400 years. From the Washington Post: "According to a letter from AP Senior Vice President and Executive Editor Julie Pace, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday warned of access restrictions if the wire service “did not immediately align its editorial standards” with the gulf-name mandate. The AP held firm, and the White House then blocked a reporter from an Oval Office event and later blocked another reporter from an event in the Diplomatic Room, according to the letter. The blocking of AP access continued throughout the week, including events at the White House on Thursday and a presidential trip on Friday. A White House official on Friday tweeted that the wire service’s “privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One,” would go to “the many thousands of reporters who have been barred from covering these intimate areas of the administration.” The AP has been a member of the 13-person presidential press pool for more than a century. How outraged is the White House press corps regarding this naked violation of the First Amendment? Not sufficiently: In her press briefing Wednesday, Leavitt faced questions from only one reporter — CNN’s Kaitlan Collins — about the matter. As Leavitt recited her position, she might as well have been stomping on a copy of the Bill of Rights under the lectern: “If we feel that there are lies being pushed by outlets in this room, we are going to hold those lies accountable. And it is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the ‘Gulf of America,’” Leavitt said, noting that major tech firms have acknowledged the change. With that, the president’s spokesperson in Orwellian fashion recategorized an editorial judgment as an assertion of fact." And yet Vance has the temerity to suggest that he (without sin) can lecture Europeans about Free Speech. What a hypocrite.
    1
  46. Of course you can live in a debt-based society. Debt, the ability to create and package debt, is great; the same is true for stocks, which are also a kind of currency, the price of which is adjusted moment by moment, and anything else on that asset spectrum, like convertible debentures; they all serve a particular purpose. Otherwise the economy would be tiny; only old people, who had saved their entire lives would be afford to buy homes with their savings, accumulated over decades... same with any high ticket item, like cars. Young people starting out would have to live with their parents virtually FOREVER. Instead, they forward sell the value of their FUTURE EARNINGS; that's called taking out a mortgage, and it's secured by the value of the home itself. Pay what you promised to pay and nobody will ever be able to take it away. You're throwing a lot of hazy and unconnected statements against the wall and hoping a few of them stick... but it's doubtful they will, because you simply don't understand capitalism. On the other hand, nothing is good when taken to extremes, and extreme debt IS bad. Indentured servitude, by the way, is not slavery. Slavery is slavery; it's endless. Indentured Servitude is indentured servitude over a particular period of time agreed upon by both parties, which is not the same thing as having a job. A job you can quit, indentured servitude is for the period contracted for, for example pay off a debt, like passage to the New World. So, in essence, the worker said: pay my fare to the New World & I will work for you for a period of 7 years to pay off that debt: he was forward-selling the value of his labor. Now, what if he died during the voyage from a giant wave or smallpox or whatever? The other side of the contract, the guy who paid the fare, was out of luck. There's always a risk; capitalism is about quantifying risk in hopes of making a profit... but, like the man said: "there's many a slip between the cup and the lip" Or, as Robert Burns said: the best laid schemes of mice and men gang aft agley...
    1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1