Comments by "Phoenix O\x27Brien" (@phoenixobrien163) on "" video.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. In the US, the Right thinks they are so clever with their smarmy comments about getting university degrees in things like Womens Studies, Black Studies, Gender Studies, etc. They never bother to read wiki about who these types are, like Nesrine Malik.  Malik has quite an impressive resume after she completed her post-graduate study at the University of London, getting a degree in Journalism. Doors opened wide. She's quoted by all the right newspapers, knows all the right people. So much for these "useless degrees" the Right laughs so much about. Poor Malik didn't like all the online criticisms and abuse she was getting, so  she contributed to a session at the British Parliament with the aim of tackling the chilling effect online abuse has on emerging writers. The  journalist Peter Oborne described Malik in the British Journalism Review as writing "with wit and punch about race, class, and gender, as well as Islam" Osborne characterised her as an example of a rising generation of politicized Muslim journalists who "use their identities to shed light on the inequalities in British society. They treat Islam as a political identity as much as a religious one. Being Muslim gives this millennial generation an air not of religious but of political defiance. For them, it is a tool for showing that Britain remains a country dominated by a small group of people." Sadly, the RIGHT has no such tools or courses of study at universities that can counter these SJW with "useless degrees", as the Right likes to put it. Nesrine Malik, otherwise known as Nesrine Milk-it.
    2
  7. 2
  8. In the US, the Right thinks they are so clever with their smarmy comments about getting university degrees in things like Womens Studies, Black Studies, Gender Studies, etc. They never bother to read wiki about who these types are, like Nesrine Milik, and just how influenced they have become.* Malik has quite an impressive resume after she completed her post-graduate study at the University of London, getting a degree in Journalism. Doors opened wide. She's quoted by all the right newspapers, knows all the right people. So much for these "useless degrees" the Right laughs so much about. Poor Milik didn't like all the online criticisms and abuse she was getting, so she contributed to a session at the British Parliament with the aim of tackling the chilling effect online abuse has on emerging writers. In other words she was talking about the benefits of Censorship. The journalist Peter Oborne described Malik in the British Journalism Review as writing "with wit and punch about race, class, and gender, as well as Islam" Osborne characterised her as an example of a rising generation of politicized Muslim journalists who "use their identities to shed light on the inequalities in British society. They treat Islam as a political identity as much as a religious one. Being Muslim gives this millennial generation an air not of religious but of political defiance. For them, it is a tool for showing that Britain remains a country dominated by a small group of people." Sadly, the RIGHT has no such tools or courses of study at universities that can counter these SJW with "useless degrees", as the Right loves to put it.
    2
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18.  @johnbest4513  -- I just finished reading Malik's article. My impression is that she's a good writer. But good writing can mask a whole lot of lies. Is she too refined to mention reparations like all her colleagues do? That's what she's after, the handing over of Britain's wealth to the Third World and Islam in Britain's midst. Her constant referring to "we" in reference to the country, was laughable and obnoxious. She never once mentioned the country's decay as stemming from allowing Islam in its midst, which has caused untold suffering and death to the indigenous British as at least being a cause of this decay along with the piling up of other factors she does mention. I don't understand much of England's political system -- who's a liberal, who's a conservative. Or what's a Tory. Or a Tory/Cavalier. But I do know her article would appeal only to liberals. And I presume it is the liberals who are behind letting in millions more illegal Africans and Muslims, and convinces the Parliament (or whomever) that they should all be cared for properly, and given DEFERENCE to everything available -- foremost TAXPAYER MONEY , while indigenous Britain's have LOST their Heritage, which was rightfully theirs. As is so in ALL Western nations now under attack one way or another. And no, it wasn't an imaginary Britain or England. But it did become a DREAM that pieces of work like Nesrine Malik try to smooth talk her way into convincing the English that their world, their HERITAGE never actually existed (THE ENGLISH, prior to the floodgates being opened). The Liberals, the effeminate Elites are the cause of the DECLINE of England. SOMEBODY stood up and said "We are so good. We ate so caring. Let's open up the floodgates to all, and care for them!" She's a dime-a-dozen smooth talker of lies, a worker of smoke and mirrors, every bit the flicker of the tongue of a snake. A huckster. A Succubus. I bet she praises Islam too, and couldn't say a bad word about Egypt where she was raised, or even Suden. If she's looking for a cause celébre, why not try to "fix" Sudan? At least she'd be more honest. To thine own self be true. Eh?
    1
  19. 1
  20. 1