Comments by "Phoenix O\x27Brien" (@phoenixobrien163) on "Tucker: Why are we funding this?" video.

  1. Tucker Carlson is the only one worth listening to on FOX News. The others are downright HIDEOUS. From that screeching, cackling Kennedy female to that equally horrid Gutfeld. That other screech Laura Ingraham, whose sharp, rasping voice, like nails down a blackboard, is enough to give anyone BRAIN FREEZE to her personal favorite Catholic, the cartoon-faced Raymond Arroyo plugging his stupid kids book. Then that "weird" looking Steve Doocey who never had an original thought in his head. "The Five" are just AWFUL All the rest are too. Tucker is the ONLY ONE actually worth listening to. This is why I am disappointed in his shabby research about these alleged "bioweapon labs". OK the guy traced it as far as he could. But taking the word of anyone, Nuland included, was a wrong move. He could have ended with addressing his viewers that maybe the US government should show them these "documents" Nuland said she's seen. Let the public tell the government via Freedom of Information Act. And then let's see what Russia is up to with THEIR secret bioweapon labs.
    7
  2. The Russian military could have bombed a university chemistry department and mistook the vials and equipment for lioweapon research for all anyone knows about it.
    2
  3. Just one question, Tucker. No one has ever given an ADDRESS where these alleged US-Ukrainian biolabs are located. Even now I ask: LET'S SEE THE LOCATIONS. AND GIVE THE NAMES OF THESE ALLEGED LABS.
    1
  4.  @LaMangouste  -- I don't really care who said what. Let her GIVE THE NAMES OF THE LABS AND THE LOCATIONS IN THE UKRAINE. I'm expected to believe the Russians found them and/or bombed them? Why no footage OF THE LOCATIONS in that case?
    1
  5. Tucker sounds like he drank the Russian kool-aid. Have the Russians show the footage of these labs they claim to have bombed, and the LOCATIONS. How did the Russians DISCERN -- repeat DISCERN -- that certain buildings were bioweapons labs anyway? Tucker has done some shoddy investigation here in an effort to have an angle -- any angle --to present to the viewer.
    1
  6. IF SOME REPUBLICAN gave the same explanation that Neuland gave, Tucker would go along with it without question. Tucker is not as smart as I thought he was.
    1