Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. ​ @elguapo1507 You might want to focus on the topic, not the spelling mistakes, for the same reason.
    6
  2. ​ @MusaA Common sense. Lol. The lowest form of science.
    3
  3. Yeah, I imagine you'd be absolutely stuffed if you didn't have them telling you what to think.
    2
  4. @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  Hard to tell. He's obviously running some sort of con, but how lucrative it is, that's anyone guess.
    2
  5. Pity the only evidence he offered to support his position was unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.
    1
  6. @robmcguckin7605  Like I said, no evidence, just conspiracy theories. Thanx for highlighting that.
    1
  7. @elguapo1507  His videos are less than factual. His entire argument is post hoc ergo propter hoc. He does absolutely nothing to isolate it a single variable. That's why the people who follow him know nothing about science and all swim at the same shallow end of the gene pool.
    1
  8. When everyone who knows what they're taking about disagrees with you, it's usually because you're wrong.
    1
  9. He's not representing those who can't speak for themselves. He's representing those who can't think for themselves. And he's doing it with completely bogus data.
    1
  10.  @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  Bogus in the sense that it doesn't say what he claims it says? Yes. Bogus in the sense that it doesn't support his conclusion? Yes.
    1
  11. @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  I just sneezed, and it started raining. Obviously, my sneezes cause rain. Should we debate that, too? Or would that be post hoc ergo propter hoc, just like the arguments being presented here?
    1
  12. @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  It means "One thing follow the others, therefore it was caused by the other". It's a logical fallacy, and precisely why the findings being presented are not based on science. I can prove that I sneezed, and I can prove that it's raining, but that doesn't prove my sneezes cause rain.
    1
  13.  @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  If Dr Campbell is so credible, why does he remove my posts that question him? Doesn't sound like he wants a debate at all.
    1
  14. @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  There is no reason YT would have done this. There's also a distinct lack of lead posts which are critical of his assertions. IME, when someone makes outrageous claims like this, and every comment supports them, it's because they're filtering out the ones servo do not.
    1
  15.  @ChrisPBacon-vf2dz  Also, when YT does this sort of thing, it happens within minutes. In this case, it took many hours. That's the channel owner doing it.
    1