Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Oh No! Alex Jones Can't Use Bankruptcy to Avoid the Sandy Hook Judgments" video.

@thenethuns5271 They like to cherry pick, and ignore the fact that rights come with responsibilities.
17
@GollumGollum1000 So he didn't accuse families of lying about, and being directly involved with the cover-up of, the deaths of their own children? If you lost a child in those circumstances, then had someone do what Jones did to you, I'm sure you'd be rethinking your take on what is and isn't horrific.
15
@GollumGollum1000 Straw man.. "Nobody should have the right to cause harm with their knowingly invalid speech" is all I'm saying.
11
@GollumGollum1000 I responded to thenethuns, so obviously the group of people he was talking about, is the "they" you're asking about. If you still don't understand, ask a grown up to explain it to you.
9
@GollumGollum1000 What a terrible world it would be, if people like you could say what ever they like, without any consequences.
8
Yep, justice wont be done until he's living in a cardboard box, eating whatever he finds in other people's trash.
7
@GollumGollum1000 "good" - Thought you'd feel that way. If that's what it takes for you to free vindicated, you probably didn't have a valid point to begin with.
7
@GollumGollum1000 Let's just say the sup crt has already ruled on situations like this. They didn't agree with you.
7
@WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS He wasn't charged with a crime. He was sued for damages as a result of his morally questionable comments.
7
@GollumGollum1000 You ignored context in order to claim the existence of ambiguity.
6
@GollumGollum1000 No, that's not my logic at all. What part of "If your speech causes harm..." do you not understand?
6
@GollumGollum1000 "You just want to paint everything I do as arguing in bad faith" - Do you copy and paste that phrase. Might save you some time if you did.
6
@GollumGollum1000 You attacked an argument I never made. That's a straw man.
6
@GollumGollum1000 In context, there was no ambiguity.
5
@GollumGollum1000 Any time I reply to you with anything on this topic, the reply gets removed.
4
@GollumGollum1000 OH!!! You think free speech means you can say what ever you like, without consequences? Well SCOTUS doesn't see it that way. You can't yell "FIRE!" in a packed theatre, then claim you're not responsible for the injuries that occur as a result of the stampede you caused. Many people incurred damages as a result of his speech.
1
@GollumGollum1000 "They" = people who don't realise that SCOTUS has already made it clear, harmful speech has ramifications.
1