Comments by "Simon Harris" (@simonharris4873) on "Bearing" channel.

  1. "That's probably what the foetus was thinking." Reminds me of an image I saw once. Young girl sitting on the bathroom floor, holding a pregnancy test. Thought bubble from her, "Oh no, my mum is going to kill me". Thought bubble from the foetus, "Oh no, my mum is going to kill me".
    34
  2. Notice how that camera angle prevents you from seeing how large this guy actually is. The showed a photo, and referred to his size in the photo. I bet he's much larger than that now. Shame on channel 10.
    16
  3. Of course not. If they wanted equality, they'd be well aware that women eye off men too, and they'd find that equally offensive. But some how, women eyeing off men is perfectly fine.
    4
  4.  @rebaxbayushi577  What ever you say, flat earther.
    4
  5. So not planes need to carry 25kg of nutella, just in case a fattie sits in the exit aisle?
    3
  6. This logo received a lot of support from straight women, but for some taken, lesbians just wouldn't get on board.
    3
  7.  @ethanmac639  What brand of breakfast cereal did you find your law degree in? It was Wheat-bix, wasn't it.
    3
  8.  @rebaxbayushi577  Garbage. They said nothing is the sort. This is what happens when you get your education from YT.
    3
  9. No deception? He lied on his immigration form FFS.
    2
  10. Mine too. "My boss was being a bit of a domed protuberance today."
    2
  11. A well as "You don't have the W to take me on".
    2
  12. So they basically assumed the gender of the entire student body. Well done morons.
    2
  13. Be honest. You think the earth is flat, don't you.
    2
  14.  @samuelgerhardt8706  It's not a straw man, it's slightly hyperbolic argumentum ad absurdum. Your "implanted by the media" comment however... now that's a straw man, which makes you a hypocrite.
    2
  15. Then they don't know what they're talking about. The minister can deport any non-citizen he sees fit to, for any reason. He has the final say.
    2
  16.  @jimmyb1451  Seems to have worked in this case. Are you for letting someone who lies on their immigration documents and fails to self isolate after testing positive into the country? Failing to self isolate was enough to send him packing IMO. That's doesn't meet the good character test.
    2
  17.  @jimmyb1451  Petrified? Strong words from an anti vaxxer who's scared of a little needle.
    2
  18.  @jimmyb1451  BTW, you still didn't answer my question. Typical troll.
    2
  19.  @lukalalosevic200  Ok troll, what ever you say.
    2
  20.  @rebaxbayushi577  Why would the onus be on me to present facts? The OP didn't present any.
    2
  21.  @vidard9863  What are you talking about? Anti vaxxers get in everyone's way.
    2
  22. "Ushered in by police?" You're not serious, are you? I thought you were smarter than that.
    1
  23. Meanwhile, the Simpsons were attacked for having too much diversity, when they included the stereotypical character Apu.
    1
  24. "Men are co-parents" brought to you by the same crazy mob that claim men should do more child rearing. Once again it looks like they can't make up their minds.
    1
  25. Dang, why didn't I think of that. My ex used to get me nutella sangers every single day. I threw them away.
    1
  26. That's not fair, the presenter obviously didn't hand pick those surveys like the feminists usually do. Of course he's going to have different results.
    1
  27. Why do feminists think men's opinions on abortion are irrelevant? You think you have the right to kill our offspring, and we shouldn't have a say in it? Ok Karen.
    1
  28. 4:25 Hand's up anyone whose first thought was "Game of Thrones".
    1
  29. When I go somewhere and the call the men sir, and the women darling, well then I think "If I'm offended by that, then I've got way too much F'ing spare time, and need more things to fill out my day".
    1
  30.  @jacobmallia7163  If you honestly require an explanation, you wouldn't have the intelligence to comprehend one.
    1
  31.  @jimmyb1451  1, you didn't answer my question. 2, 1% of 7.9 billion is 79 million. 3, only losers without a valid point play the commie card
    1
  32.  @ethanmac639  You don't have the right to selfishly put the lives of others at risk. Stop being such a snowflake.
    1
  33.  @ethanmac639  Your feel of needles, ignorance of facts and feelings of inadequacy doesn't give you any special rights. If others have the right to protect themselves, the you won't mind when businesses insist their customers are vaccinated, right?
    1
  34.  @ethanmac639  The right to put others at risk. You don't have that right, and it's extremely childish if you to demand it. If you we've grow up you'll see what I mean, but selfish people like you rarely do.
    1
  35.  @ethanmac639  What ever you say, keyboard warrior.
    1
  36.  @ethanmac639  Nobody is taking your rights away. Rights come with responsibilities. You forego your own rights by acting irresponsibly. You want your rights? Grow up, act like an adult and earn them like everyone else does.
    1
  37.  @ethanmac639  If nobody has the right to grant you rights, then what makes you think you have any at all?
    1
  38.  @ethanmac639  You really don't get it, do you. You're the problem.
    1
  39.  @ethanmac639  God given? Where in the bible does it say that? Have you even read it?
    1
  40. His partner just found out he's been cheating on him.
    1
  41. You can't add preventative like that. Especially when both companies are of differing value. But I suppose they are women...
    1
  42.  @ServantOfSatania  That"science" is the matter? Lol, that's rich. You anti vaxxer trolls know less about science than the climate change deniers.
    1
  43.  @rebaxbayushi577  That's exactly what flat earthers say.
    1
  44.  @rebaxbayushi577 I'm not asking for any fact. You are, hypocrite.
    1
  45.  @ServantOfSatania  What ever you say, stalker.
    1
  46.  @ServantOfSatania  Then maybe you'd like to provide some evidence to support Rebax Bayushi's claims. He certainly hasn't. But you have no problem believing him, because you 2 are in the same echo chamber.
    1
  47.  @ServantOfSatania  That's argumentum ad verecundiam. I asked for evidence, not your misrepresentation of someone else's opinion. You don't really know much about science, do you, troll.
    1
  48.  @ServantOfSatania  The claim was actually "quite a lot a scientists specialising in virology..." That requires data, not your twisted interpretation of someone else's opinion. There is no data to support that statement, because it's complete and utter rubbish.
    1
  49.  @vidard9863 Only idiots demand the right to put the lives of others at risk.
    1
  50.  @vidard9863  The more people who refuse the vaccine, the longer we need lockdown measures, it's that simple. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you'd have figured that out for yourself.
    1