Comments by "Paul Frederick" (@1pcfred) on "I Testified Against the Assault Weapons Ban" video.

What you need to do is get in your garden shed and with British ingenuity make the equal, opposite and unexpected reaction happen. Invent a practical energy weapon or rail gun. Because that's the rational conclusion to all of this gun foolishness. Technological escalation. Oh you think that's so bad? Well how about this then?
12
@zombieexpressiv1017 there was a strange case here a while back where a property owner defended themselves with a samurai sword. Being as I live in a Constitutional carry state archaic weapons are pretty rare here. But the courts were cool with the sword defence. The intruder had a lengthy police record. It was so bizarre I followed that case with some interest. Initially no one knew what to make of all of it. Being as the situation seemed so barbaric. If he'd just shot the guy it would have been more open and shut. But no he had to break out the samurai sword.
3
@AirAssault7 it was very surprising. We're a Constitutional carry state so pretty much anyone that wants a firearm has one. Although oddly throwing stars are strangely illegal here. Why? I've no good idea. You can walk around with a gun but don't let us catch you with any of those freaky far eastern weapons. That's apparently where we draw the line. Although samurai swords are OK. We can't have fireworks either. So New Years sounds like a shooting range. The 4th of July people just use fireworks anyways. Because Murica.
3
Technically not entirely true. Murdering people is illegal. Killing depends on circumstances. There is such a thing as justified homicide.
1
Of course they can. An assault weapon is any firearm they decide is. At the rate they're going spitballs will be on the list soon.
1
Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Sometimes they use guns to do it too. Now if you're against that then there's nothing better than a gun to stop it. Passing laws against gun ownership is just voting for criminals. Because a criminal isn't going to obey the law in the first place.
1
@kaidiya2403 crossbows? Bows are not firearms. They're sporting goods. That's like regulating tennis rackets. Semi fully automatic golf clubs!
1
@kaidiya2403 if someone is bent on murder Caine took care of Able without a firearm. Really there's worse ways of going than getting shot. If you could pick and choose your fate. So legislating the method is lunacy. We've already made the act itself illegal. I stopped trying to figure out the logic of people a long time ago. Because there ain't none.
1