Comments by "Paul Frederick" (@1pcfred) on "Pandemic insurance doesn't cover COVID-19? 🤔" video.

There is no profit in handing money out. A dollar kept is a dollar earned though.
12
Ah where do they think the water in the river came from?
12
It'd be their problem when they're in front of the judge trying to peddle that BS. I'd insist on a jury trial too. You'd have lawyers lined up around the block wanting to represent you in that case.
4
It isn't an apt analogy. A Ponzi scheme is a specific kind of a financial scam. It is overused today to encompass to many other kinds of scams.
2
@bosstowndynamics5488 it doesn't matter because they were lying. Car insurance is exactly that. It covers the car. Now your policy may cover you in other cars. Or a policy may not cover if someone unauthorized is operating your vehicle. But dead or alive if it was your corpus behind the wheel they're liable. They damn well know it too. They're just trying to be cute about it.
1
@threeMetreJim if it was me I'd make sure my lawyer went after the municipality and the owner of the vehicle. They'd all pay! Shit if I could prove you were walking by on the sidewalk when it happened your ass would be in court too.
1
Flooding is flooding. Anyone that disagrees should be flogged. While it's happening they can be told they're not being beaten in the strictest sense.
1
@hilihkintil6789 it does not matter where the water came from. The only things that matter is where it ended up and what happened when it did. The definition of flood is as follows: an overflowing of a large amount of water beyond its normal confines, especially over what is normally dry land. Ain't nothing in there about where the water came from. If you get flooded out your flood insurance damn well should cover it!
1
@hilihkintil6789 as far as I'm concerned flood insurance should cover any high water damage regardless of the source. Unless maybe your neighbor's pool collapsed or some other man made calamity. Then it might be a case of liability. We get insurance to protect ourselves though. When I'm out I want to be compensated. I pay premiums to that end. Yet insurance companies operate to get money for apparently nothing.
1
For that argument to stand up they're going to have to produce God as a material character witness. Failing to do that they're going to have to pay.
1
@kabochaVA two who are wrong do not make each other right.
1
@kabochaVA I know how to spell, "too many". Please realize I am not going to proofread every random comment I leave on the Internet. I even saw that and decided fuck it, I'm not going to bother editing it. There's nothing on the Moon that I need to examine very closely. But if someone is pointing at things next to me I am going to look them up and down. Which includes their fingers. Confucius say, Man who farts in church sits in his own pew!
1
A relationship is a form of an association though. In this context we can view the words as being synonymous. Their meanings are identical.
1
@threeMetreJim I'd rather have 12 irrational assholes in a jury decide. The right jury can really hammer a corporation. People can be real spiteful. Especially if they think they're sticking it to the Man. Folks just live for the day when they can do that. There's a group psychology dynamic involved. Juries can really get on a roll. This is why we hear so much about out of court settlements. Lawyers working for insurance companies are well aware of all of this themselves.
1