Comments by "MrSirhcsellor" (@MrSirhcsellor) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1. Ok, or...a few people were successfully conned by online grifters, who took advantage of their paranoia and lack of knowledge, to sell them cleverly crafted lies.
    6
  2. Ya, thousands of years, and they still don’t have a working model...I wonder why?
    5
  3. We don’t, the South has a completely different set of stars than the North and along the ecliptic plane the stars are seasonal, you even know the constellations that are seasonal, they are the zodiac constellations. Stars do change...if you were an astronomer who actually spent their life observing and tracking the stars, you’d know that.
    5
  4. Huh...didn't know the Jesuits made the southern hemisphere...are they in charge of eclipses too? Sunsets too? Cause none of these things make any sense on any version of Flat Earth...but they sure do make sense on a Globe. Weird...but I guess I'll just listen to some random guy on the internet, seems to be all the rage these days.
    4
  5.  @marquism2920  This is pretty common knowledge…every climate scientist in the world, meteorologist, mechanical engineer, physicist…heck the list goes on, they all know and understand this, as do most regular people who are not in any scientific field. Just because you don’t, doesn’t mean others don’t as well. I didn’t explain some hidden knowledge to you…this is taught in grade school, in general science classes. If you don’t know this, then you either didn’t pay attention in school, or you received a VERY poor education…which explains a lot really.
    3
  6.  @marquism2920  Yes, a regular theory in the layman usage of the word means; a guess or assumption based from prior knowledge, but not yet proven, verified, or confirmed. Do you know the definition of a scientific theory? It is a body of knowledge, established with proven and verified facts and confirmed data, that describes how a physical phenomena of nature functions and why it occurs. Two very different things. You are aware there are many words in the English language with multiple definitions, depending on the context…right? Please learn the difference between a regular theory and a scientific theory.
    3
  7. They don’t only have composite pictures of Earth, whoever told you that was lying. The Apollo missions took hundreds of photos of Earth (all well archived 😅if you bothered to actually look), in single shots, on regular film, long before CGI, photoshop, or even satellites…so how exactly did they make composites of Earth before they had the technology to do so? 🧐 Look up the Artemis program…that’s exactly what Tesla and Nasa are currently doing. New missions to the Moon have already occurred, with manned missions happening within the next couple years. Stop getting your information from huxters online.
    3
  8. Claims to have a Bachelor’s degree in science...doesn’t know the difference between Laws and Theories in science. Did you skip the basics?
    3
  9. Science wants us as slaves? Yikes...didn't realize science was a person and had such a tyrannical, overlord, agenda. I always thought science was just the recorded knowledge of everything we observe and understand about the physical world around us. It also made this computer I'm typing on (and every invention and modern comfort) a reality. Thanks for letting me know though...random guy on the internet that probably failed science and doesn't know how his cell phone/computer works.
    2
  10. If everything requires a creator, who created God? You can say this creator always existed, but then why can’t the same be said about the universe in general? It’s circular reasoning. Either way, it’s a non falsifiable belief, really pretty pointless to debate. Big Bang says nothing about what came before Big Bang, and it doesn’t falsify God, it’s just interpreting data from the evidence of cosmic background radiation, and red shift in stars, that all correlates with our understanding of general relativity, to suggest everything started at a single point. It’s a conclusion drawn from the current evidence we have…that’s all. Science is happy to admit when it’s wrong, but then provide the evidence that proves it wrong…this isn’t difficult. Your non falsifiable belief in a creator does nothing to address the evidence of Big Bang cosmology….it’s just completely misunderstanding how science operates.
    2
  11.  @marquism2920  Well, no, that’s an easy one. Wind is basically just a current of motion in our atmosphere, not much different from any current of motion, like a river, or the deep ocean currents (which is a more accurate comparison). It occurs for many reasons, all having to do with anything that can cause motion to occur in the molecules that make up our atmosphere. So air pressure, temperature fluctuations, Earth’s rotational motion, etc. You may not be aware of this but gas is classified as a fluid in physics, and behaves in many similar ways that liquid fluids do. Wind is just the air in motion, for various reasons. It’s just fluid mechanics, which is a whole field of physics. You not currently understanding how winds occur, tells me your level of scientific literacy…that being not very high. Just because you don’t personally understand how something works, does not automatically mean others do not as well. Do some actual research on the wind, you’ll learn a lot about it…it’s very well understood today, with countless experiments that verify our understanding as accurate.
    2
  12. That's false...wait...
    2
  13. They were zoomed in…that was a high powered telescope they were using…did you even watch the video? How much closer you think they can get? 🧐 Wake up bud…you’ve been duped by Flat Earth huxters confusing vanishing point for horizon.
    2
  14. Heat is transferred in many ways, on Earth it’s mostly through convection, that being air pressure trapping thermal energy for longer periods of time. In space, there is no air pressure, so convection heat transfer can not occur. So in space heat is only transferred through direct solar radiation, which absolutely can be deflected, fairly easily in fact, with proper reflective and shielding materials. So the problem here is just in assuming the environment of space is the same as what we experience here on the surface. And a lack of physics knowledge on how thermodynamics actually works in different environments, such as a vacuum.
    2
  15. But they do say water is always level...that's why we make most of our observations over water...and yup, still curved.
    2
  16. What do you think they were using to make the observation with? 🧐
    2
  17. So you have trust issues? That's a good sign that you have a paranoid mind set, which means you're likely not very good with reasoning as you probably also think in absolutes. The government lies sometimes, therefore they lie all the time...that's a logical fallacy and it should be pretty obvious where the fallacy is. Anyone can prove the shape of our planet, with nothing more then a few simple observations. You don't require NASA or the government to deduce our geometry...you can absolutely figure it out for yourself.
    2
  18. You can’t see stars in photos from space, because of a cameras exposure setting. To photograph the Earth so that you get a clear image of the Earth, you have to greatly reduce the exposure of light upon the film or film sensor. So you have to lower the exposure setting. When you do this, the camera essentially filters out the amount of light that is coming into the camera lens. So anything not bright enough to make it through this filter setting, will not be seen in the final image. It’s photography 101, I would suggest learning more about the exposure setting of a camera. Plenty of information and demonstrations online.
    2
  19.  @marquism2920  Well, no, a scientific theory is very different from a regular theory. Nothing becomes a scientific theory without first being verified with evidence…lots of it actually. But no…fluid dynamics is not really theory, it’s actually more rooted in the laws of science, in the conservation laws. Wind is just fluid motion, molecules of atmospheric gas, caught in a current like motion. It’s proven science…you can verify it at anytime you choose to do the research, and learn what everyone else already knows. As for Big Bang, it’s a lot more complex, but it absolutely does have evidence….but if you’re not even well read enough on something as simple as how the wind works, then I don’t expect you’ll understand more advanced physics like Big Bang cosmology. But look up the 4 pillars of the Big Bang sometime anyway, if it really interests you. I’m just saying, there’s a lot you don’t currently understand. I hope this information is helpful though.
    1
  20. Look up the WGS84 globe model sometime, the model currently used in all modern navigation systems. A model of the globe, based from physical surface measurements and data, that works when applied in such fields as navigation, among many others. There ya go, a working mathematical model of Earth’s surface geometry and structure. Now show us a working model of Flat Earth.
    1
  21. You know where I’m from, if you didn’t understand something that everyone else could understand pretty easily, it meant you were stupid. When did that change?
    1
  22. This just shows us how little you understand about gravity.
    1
  23.  @ronlegere1894  It's not magic, it's physical reality...and you're misunderstanding how it works. A hill is a drop in the ocean, compared to the whole mass of the planet.
    1
  24.  @ronlegere1894  You are just demonstrating more and more your misunderstanding of how gravity works. Feel free to keep going.
    1
  25. It doesn't...there is no working Flat Earth model...because Flat Earth is not reality.
    1
  26. There is a real commercial pilot from Australia that goes by Wolfie6020 here on YouTube, check his channel out sometime, he confirms the Earth is spherical in pretty much every video he uploads.
    1
  27. They did...do you think that video they took wasn't taken while zoomed in?
    1
  28.  @KangenAlec  You didn’t answer the question at all….just made a few more dumb and empty claims. Why even bother commenting? 🤷‍♂️
    1
  29. Are you a Structural Engineer and a Sniper too? Cause I very much doubt you are.
    1
  30. I’ve been to New Zealand and Australia twice now, and Malaysia, Thailand, Japan as well. I flew across the pacific on every trip…there and back again, East to West and West to East. So not sure what you’re talking about. 😂 Maybe you could benefit from a little travel bud.
    1
  31. Claims that Flat Earthers go by physical evaluation...then trails off on a paranoid claim made about the Antarctica, that has nothing to do with physical evaluation and has more to do with paranoid conjecture and conspiracy theory. Hmmm...
    1
  32. But existing IS the reason you're here. Think about it, if you could not see, hear, touch, taste, or smell anything...would the universe exist? If you had never seen it before, if no life was here to experience any of it...it technically wouldn't exist at all. In a way, through your 5 senses, through your consciousness, YOU create the universe, just as much as it created you. I personally find that very humbling. What purpose were you hoping for though? You shouldn't wait for an eternal reward...that may never come, you should find your purpose here and now and seek it out, make your OWN purpose, in the time that you have. I myself am an artist and musician, I can't claim I'm great at either of these things, but they bring me purpose and joy, and I don't need an afterlife for that...this place is incredible enough and I much prefer making my own purpose! I think waiting for a God to take you into his kingdom...is a bit of a waste of time, but to each their own I suppose.
    1