Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "Sanders Introduces Resolution to Protect American Democracy from Russian Meddling" video.

  1. Really? Bernie already took them to court, founded an organization fighting back against the DNC, and has been working hard to eliminate superdelegates from the party or strip them of power. He's been working his ass off and has barely done anything about Russia besides calling for paper ballots to protect the vote, which is a smart idea even if you're in the camp of people who doubt reality. He's doing the common sense thing here calling for a resolution and he's already been fighting the DNC and DCCC for 2 years now. Get with the program.
    4
  2. Rand Paul voted in a neocon warmonger as the Secretary of State so we know he doesn't give a fuck about "diplomacy" and it's just a way to fall in line with Trump and his corrupt party. The whole idea of "wanting war" is just a giant strawman anyways. Whatever happened to "being strong" with the Republican party? No one wants war or conflict, but it seems like it's just an excuse to not take action to protect the vote in future elections.
    1
  3. Sanders is focusing on what's in front of him. He knows he would never get Trump or the GOP to sign onto a resolution to stop the wars and foreign intervention. They're too busy bombing 8 different countries right now and they're all pathetically corrupt. Sanders knows that if our elections are compromised in 2018 or 2020 from Russia, China, Iran or elsewhere, then the country will go into complete turmoil and chaos and our small bit of democracy we have left will crumble. There's a huge difference between buying into "the McCarthyist Russian Blaim Train" and simply wanting to protect our future elections from foreign interference from more than just Russia, which is why he has tried to call on Congress to switch to paper ballots in the past but the GOP and many corporate Democrats don't give a shit and would rather see our country go into chaos. Why do you think it's not better take the safe road and protect ourselves even if your doubting the whole Russia investigation? Why is it okay to NOT protect the vote? This is what I don't understand about the people who are doubting reality here, what happens if you're WRONG? It's the same idea about the people who deny climate change if you ask me: What happens if you're wrong?
    1
  4. Funny how you just ranted about Dems being corrupt yet you put a Democrat, Tulsi Gabbard, as apparently someone more credible than Bernie, the longest serving Independent in Congress and still an Independent this election year. Bernie's done far more fighting back against the Democratic party and the DNC/DCCC the last 2 years than he has against speaking out against the Russia issue and he even took the DNC to court over the primary, he founded Our Revolution, which has been backing candidates to force out corporate Democrats, and has been fighting hard to strip superdelegates of power in the Democratic Party, what more do you want from him? He's only one man. The only thing he's done with Russia is the common sense idea of switching to paper ballots and his resolution here that calls for further protections to protect future elections against any country that tries to interfere in our vote.
    1