Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "Krystal v AOC Covered By Fox News Charlatans | The Kyle Kulinski Show" video.

@Onkoe Yeah, that honestly just felt like a cheap low blow. I never cared about the Met Gala thing personally. AOC's allowed to have some fun and she went specifically wearing a middle finger to the wealthy class. & then randomly bringing it up as if there's low security at the Gala.. That whole Twitter brawl became counter-productive almost instantly - all you gotta do is tell AOC to show up to the next union gathering even when they're not backed by the larger union groups or at least show support earlier on Twitter. You don't need to throw mud at a brick wall in an effort to try to humiliate her publicly using year-old faux controversies.
19
@krackerr AOC attended cause she was invited, but you conveniently left out the part where she went wearing a figurative middle finger to the wealthy class. Still can't believe anybody got outraged over something so insignificant. It's the equivalent to people getting angry at Rutger Bregman for going to Davos to tell them the wealthy needed to pay taxes on their enormous fortunes & how nobody ever says a single word about tax avoidance at the forum.
10
True. AOC's inability to admit where she's wrong &/or let things go is usually what snags her in controversy with the Left. I think her high activity online & on Twitter is partly to blame cause she prides herself on speaking with the community, but in the end, that's what ends up getting her in trouble, just like it would nearly any politician that has to work inside the US's broken gov't & political system.
9
@Youneverknow100 It doesn't matter what the reasoning was (& what you said is assuming a lot), she still put herself in, what I would have to imagine, is an uncomfortable position of flipping everyone in the Gala the middle finger. As I said, it's like when Rutger Bregman went to Davos to tell them all they should stop avoiding taxes. Did "anything get done" in that building either? No, but it made the news and put taxing the rich at the forefront of everyone's minds. For some reason barely anyone points out the hypocritical low hanging fruit in that situation, but when AOC is the topic of discussion, people lose their shit over an incredibly inconsequential and innocuous issue & start coming up with wild assumptions and accusations in what amounts to just confirmation bias.
5
@deavinmichael3182 She should've tweeted before and it's fair to tell her that, but I think @William Molock's point was that even if she tweeted before, the outrage would've shifted to "why weren't you there" & you still would've had this dumb Twitter drama. I hate to say her best option was to just not say anything at all but I imagine she saw the victory and just wanted to spread the news.
5
They try to own AOC by bringing up the one thing she did that was positive for New York constituents by stopping New Yorkers from paying for Jeff Bezos's private helipad.
2
I think Krystal was right (to an extent) to tweet at AOC to try to get her to show up for the next gathering even when they're not sanctioned by the traditional union groups. She (and even AOC) took it too far though and it quickly become counter-productive, as evidenced by Fox News butting in to act as if they're the pillars of working class support.
1
If AOC was married to Will Smith, the guy would be too busy smacking people to even take a shit.
1