Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "Jordan Peterson Vs Michael Eric Dyson | TENSE Debate On Political Correctness" video.

  1. Stop. Just stop. As soon as you pricks see one of these channels do something you don't agree with or like, you immediately start calling them pro-establishment, "fake progressives", or anything under the sun to try to discredit them as not worthy of views and begin bombing the fuck out of their comment boards. You do the same thing to TYT when you don't like their stories or agree with them and start claiming "TYT=MSNBC". It's like the progressive version of discrediting someone, and it's fucking annoying considering nobody is a "fake progressive" or whatever you're about to call Kyle. Just because you disagree with one of his stories doesn't mean shit and you can go fuck off if you're gonna start throwing smears at him because you don't like his take on Jordan Peterson.
    28
  2. More likely you're just turning into a triggered little bitch. "Now that Kyle said something mean about Jordan Peterson, let's call him a fake progressive". Really? Kyle does one story you don't like and now he's an ideologue. Fuck off.
    16
  3. +Justin Gutierrez - Yes! Thank you for saying that. It's the same fucking thing with Jimmy Dore's followers except about 10 times worse with them. The thing was too, Kyle was being objective in the video. He made an argument against both sides and essentially said the whole debate was silly and both men were wrong to begin with. So many people coming out and suddenly claiming "Kyle's becoming Cenk", and "Kyle's becoming a fake progressive" because Kyle wouldn't take Jordan Peterson's side exclusively? It's ridiculous especially people claiming he wasn't objective in that analysis, which he was.
    8
  4. Kyle Kyle Kyle you completely tip toed around the giant elephant in the room concerning "white privilege". Literally the only time I ever hear people talk about white privilege is almost always right after a black kid or a black man get shot by a cop in ridiculous circumstances. It seems to be the main concern of black minorities in this country, just the fact that they don't want to have to worry about getting shot to death every time they're stopped at a traffic light by the cops. Philando Castile, for example, was licensed with a firearm, literally did everything he was supposed to do with telling the officers he had a firearm and then the cop shot him 7 times because the cop was jumpy and he knew there was a licensed firearm in the car. The guy had his girlfriend and his child in the car, was calm as hell and got killed anyways after taking all the right steps. To make it worse, the NRA, who are supposed to defend this sort of crap, didn't make one statement about the whole case and ignored it completely. If that's not an example of white privilege that black men aren't ever afforded, then I don't know what is. Those shootings happen so often too. I literally never think about white privilege until something awful happens with the cops, which would've never happened with a white person.
    8
  5. +FoxxehBunneh - You're wrong. I'm a computer programmer (not just technician apprentice). In a few decades, maybe even several years, we're going to get to a point where there will be a mass shortage of jobs. Next thing to stop being a career are cab drivers, truck drivers, bus drivers, baristas, shop clerks, receptionists, and many many more. Programmers and robotics experts are never going to stop innovating just because it's the future no matter how you wanna argue with it, so it will eventually lead to massive numbers of people without any jobs. The only thing that makes sense in a future society where people will have to work half as much or even a third as much is to eventually initiate a UBI where people can decide on what they want to pursue most in life without having to put food on the table. In 10-20 years, if this is not the case, there will be mass homelessness and starvation if we keep living in the sad excuse for a society we live in now.
    5
  6. I don't know too much about Jordan Peterson, but he definitely is not an "anti-PC" spokesperson as far as I can tell. He got triggered as fuck there, everyone saw it. Right-wing political correctness just looks different than liberal political correctness and I would say Jordan Peterson is pro-right-wing political correctness considering he got upset over being called an angry white guy. Kyle's right though that that debate was just silly though.
    4
  7. You coulda fooled me on what that debate was about. Seemed to me the black guy was arguing against political correctness and then Jordan Peterson got all fucking weird about it. I was having trouble following along with it though because you did not warn us whatsoever wtf that was about first. Jordan Peterson is kinda ridiculous though. I don't know anything about the other guy, but Jordan Peterson just kind of seems like the opposite of the anti-PC guy considering he is a triggered whiny bitch. I would've loved to see Cornel West debate him. Cornel West would tear him a new asshole.
    2
  8. +Carpe Imodiem - The debate was about political correctness. They're right, we did see enough. It's a silly fucking debate topic to begin with.
    1
  9. +Carpe Imodiem - Which is why it's a perfect debate for Jordan Peterson, because he's a silly little man who whines like a sad snowflake.
    1
  10. +Carpe Imodiem - Make shit up?.. Like saying Jordan Peterson is a triggered dick-skinned pair of clown shoes. Like that? I didn't make that up though. It's common household knowledge about Jordan Peterson.
    1