Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "BOMBSHELL: Proof Trump Is Puppet Of Foreign Power" video.

  1. Yes, all facts. It's ridiculous seeing the responses trying to misconstrue what you said since everything you said is just an objective fact. "+Palpameme" saying you "wanted the US to bomb Russian troops" because you simply stated the events that happened is a great example of what I've been referring to as reverse Russia hysteria, where people are using the same flawed logic to disprove the Russia collusion. The same flawed logic certain people use to jump to conclusions about "Trump being Putin's puppet". In my opinion, the truth lies somewhere in the middle but it is annoying to see people like Kyle with usually air tight logic completely go off the rails on this issue to try to illogically disprove it and somehow using Netanyahu and Trump's relationship as some kind of evidence to prove no collusion? Makes no fucking sense.
    15
  2. My biggest issue with this story is that he somehow equates Trump and Netanyahu's, most likely corrupt, relationship as some kind of evidence to disprove Trump Russia connections. Whether you see Trump Russia story as one way or the other, that logic makes ABSOLUTELY no fucking sense. They have nothing to do with one another. Kyle's logic is usually air tight until it comes to guessing about the Russia collusion stories.
    9
  3. He at least admitted that Russia hacked into US institutions during the 2016 campaign the other day when the indictments came out, but yeah he still believes that there is somehow no way Trump could've colluded even though he's literally reporting on how Trump colluded with Israel to axe the Iran Deal. Trump is corrupt in more than one way and claiming he can only collude and have corruption with one country is ridiculous.
    7
  4. +RAT7163 - Yes exactly! My thoughts exactly. This video was disappointing to me because it seems like Kyle is trying to disprove one narrative "Trump is Putin's puppet" by entertaining an even more flawed argument that "Trump is Netanyahu's puppet" and using an extremely vague tape saying Netanyahu "convinced" Trump of something to prove so. People convince Trump of things constantly everyday, he doesn't have real ideologies. Both of those narratives are entirely speculative, but what we know for certain is that Russia hacked into US institutions and Trump is doing nothing to protect future elections. This is simple logic here: taking what you know for certain and leaving out what you don't know for certain such as if Trump is in the pocket of either Putin OR Netanyahu. If I had to make a guess though, I would say Trump is extremely corrupt with both Israel and Russian oligarchs. Claiming he is anyone's puppet remains to be seen. I'm disappointed in Kyle's flawed logic here.
    4
  5. Why is Trump's corrupt relationship with Netanyahu somehow evidence to disprove Trump and Russia? Your conclusion makes no sense Kyle and it just comes off as extremely biased. One does not disprove the other. Trump is capable of multiple types of corruption.
    4
  6. Both Kyle AND Cenk both have flawed views of the "Russia stuff". It's because both of them don't treat the subject as speculative like it should be. Cenk's opinion is too strong against Trump Russia connections and goes too far, while Kyle's opinion goes too far in the other direction and basically tries to make it fact that there is NO collusion. It's a subject that is completely up in the air and they both act like they have the answers, when they don't and nobody does except for the people in charge of the investigations and Putin knows for certain as well. I wonder if people treated Watergate like this and the public was jumping to conclusions before the investigation was over just as everyone is jumping to conclusions about Trump Russia collusion. All I know for certain, is that we know nothing for certain yet so maybe people should start treating this as a more hypothetical issue.
    4
  7. Yes Russian sanctions were never implemented by Trump and have not been fully enforced even though Congress overwhelmingly voted them in and even the Republicans are in support of them so Trump refusing to enforce them is an anomaly in itself
    4
  8. I'm really disappointed in you Kyle. I watch you every day, but you're trying to disprove one flawed narrative by entertaining another narrative with the same flawed logic. Claiming "Trump is Netanyahu's puppet" is just as speculative as claiming Trump is Putin's puppet. All those tapes say is that Netanyahu convinced Trump to axe the Iran Deal, so what? People convince Trump of shit every day all day, he has no real ideologies. Don't get me wrong, I fucking hate Trump, but it seems like you're just extremely biased against Russiagate that you would use examples with Israel as some kind of proof disproving Russia. That makes absolutely no sense.
    4
  9. Why is it that it can apparently only be Russia or all these other countries? Why is it that it can't be both? With MSM it is apparently ONLY Russia and with Kyle and certain independent media it is apparently ONLY all the other countries minus Russia. In my opinion, Trump is more than capable of corruption with all these foreign powers. This story proves that Trump has the biggest problem with Israel more than anything since it is literally determining foreign policy like the IRAN DEAL that was a deal stopping nuclear armament, and then after that are Russia and Saudi Arabia on equal footing since it seems like Trump had set up deals with Saudi and Russian oligarchs during his campaign and there is more than enough evidence with both of those to prove he has corrupt relations with oligarchs in both countries. I think MSM goes too far in one direction but then Kyle goes too far in the other direction. Isn't it possible that the truth lies somewhere in between? Just sayin'
    3
  10. I totally 100% agree with this story, but I think it's weird that you used it as some kind of fuel to downplay events with Russia especially since that tape just says that Netanyahu convinced Trump and gives no other detail. His exact words were "We convinced the US president [to exit the deal] and I had to stand up against the whole world and come out against this agreement". Claiming that Trump is owned by Netanyahu is a little bit of an overstatement and it seems like you're just using it as a way to downplay Russia interfering in the election. The latest indictments didn't even have anything to do with Trump, they had more to do with the NRA than anyone.
    3
  11. Someone "convinced" Trump to do something: That's not a bombshell dude. I'm really disappointed in Kyle here. It's like he's suffering from reverse Russia hysteria.
    3
  12. How about criticize both of them. They are both corrupt nations that likely have corrupt relationships with our president. Why must it be one or the other?
    3
  13. Trump is corrupt when it comes to all these foreign powers. Russia, Israel, China/ZTE, Saudi Arabia, Turkey. Why the fuck does everyone have to focus on just one or the other? This is what I don't understand about ALL media including Kyle who seems biased in his own way.
    2
  14. And Now his administration and Trump himself are ramping up tensions with Iran. Trump literally threatened them yesterday in all caps. He threatened them with Regime Change. Where the fuck are all the right-wingers saying leftists want war because they want to protect the vote? Are they freaking out about Trump starting war with Iran for fucking Nothing?
    2
  15. Trump has still not fully enforced the sanctions Congress overwhelmingly passed. Many senators have called for him to enforce the sanctions, which he has not fully done yet. He's essentially ignoring Congress's will by doing so.
    2
  16. Trump's Iran tweet has actually been all over the news
    2
  17. Uygur owns the company that give Secular Talk and JD Show a platform you idiot. I'm sure he's fully aware, which is why he doesn't censor shows in his network. They clearly embrace differing opinions unlike you.
    2
  18. +AntiFOX - Is that why tyt also covered this story earlier today? They even went a step further than Kyle and was claiming Trump was potentially going to start a war with Iran just to help his approval rating evidence as such from his unhinged tweet where he is threatening Iran with regime change. Only difference is TYT didn't somehow use Trump Israel corruption as an argument disproving the Trump Russia corruption. Most logical people understand Trump is capable of corruption with more than one country at a time.
    2
  19. +Ian Sullivan - Trump literally just threatened Iran with WAR and Regime Change today and sent an unhinged tweet from the President of the United States in ALL CAPS telling them we would destroy them if they don't stop saying bad words. He's gearing up for Iraq War 2.0 just to distract from his endless controversies most likely.
    1
  20. +Ian Sullivan - I never thought and still don't think war with Russia is even remotely a possibility. It would be Russia vs all the power of NATO, which would essentially be Russia vs the rest of the world, you can see why it would be in Putin's best interests to weaken NATO alliances. And even though war with North Korea is still a possibility to this day (they haven't disarmed in the slightest), it is still far off from being reality since Kim Jong Un is just worried about holding his grip of power and knows he would instantly be on a losing side of war with the United States. He can't even feed his own people. However, war with Iran is a more realistic possibility mainly because the US has already had a 10 year war with its neighboring country and MSM like Fox News in particular is talented at drudging out propaganda against Muslim countries and it throws right-wing and some neoliberal support behind wars with Middle East countries. A war with another middle east country is entirely possible especially since they DON'T actually have nukes. Funny how the US only respects other countries when they have nuclear arms to threaten it with. Also, you forget the US is already bombing 8 different countries right now and most of those are countries in or around the Middle East.
    1
  21. +Hakurei Oni - Yeah pretty much, if the US pulls out of NATO because of Trump and NATO loses its strongest member with more military power than the 28 countries left combined, then war between Russia and NATO aka Europe becomes far more possible and Russia could end up invading and dominating all of East Europe. However, that still doesn't involve the US. The only way the US would ever get in a conflict with Russia is if it would be with NATO as the face of the Allies. If the US was in NATO though, I don't think it would be wise in the slightest for Russia to invade Estonia which is currently a NATO country. That war is idiotic no matter how you start it though or if the US is still in NATO because if the war ramps up tensions then nukes could start flinging at each other and everyone on Earth loses. I'm sure the US only likes getting into wars where they are the only ones with nukes, which is why war with Iran is the most likely possibility out of all 3 of those theoretical wars. Even if the US wasn't a part of a NATO war with Russia though and nukes landed all over Europe and Russia, the Americans would still lose though and the Earth would be plunged into a nuclear winter even without the US's help in causing a global extinction disaster. Probably why it's important for the US to stay in NATO to keep Russia from doing something monumentally stupid.
    1
  22. +King Fenrir - So having an opinion about a hypothetical story where all the evidence isn't available yet makes someone a "neoliberal"? Sounds rational
    1
  23. +Boycott israeli products - TYT also covered the story and took it a step farther than Kyle even saying Trump could start a war with Iran just to help his approval rating since war against Muslims unites the warmongers in the country and distracts from Trump's controversies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPAUkwoURPw
    1
  24. I think Wikileaks is more biased towards Russia than they are towards Trump. I think the only reason they slightly were in support of Trump's candidacy in the first place because they saw him as upsetting the establishment.
    1