Comments by "" (@thehumanity0) on "David to Debate Candace Owens at Politicon w/ Kyle Kulinski" video.

  1. They gave them a list of people they wanted to debate including Ben Shapiro and several others but all the right-wingers have either backed out of their debates or completely chickened out with this years left-wing lineup. Sam Seder was supposed to debate Steven Crowder, then Crowder backed out, then he was supposed to debate Charlie Kirk and now Kirk has back out after it was fucking confirmed. Coulter backed out of debating Kyle Kulinski. The right-wing are running scared this year, it's fucking embarrassing, they're all trying to rush to debate Hasan Piker, because he's a joke and the weakest person on the left by far.
    2
  2. It's a fucking disaster this year. David Pakman, Kyle Kulinski and David Pakman have all been getting canceled on left and right even on confirmed events like Sam Seder vs Charlie Kirk and Kyle Kulinski vs Ann Coulter. The right has been backing out with nearly every single debate.
    1
  3. They're backing out in record numbers this year. It's fucking embarrassing
    1
  4. Jimmy wouldn't go to Politicon, the guy can't debate to save his mother. He completely buckles when he's challenged in the slightest, that's why he never takes callers and hasn't tried to debate anyone for years. There's a reason for that, he never studied political science and he is literally just a comedian who doesn't know anything past his reactionary talking points.
    1
  5. +Logan Bald - I've seen him debate Steve ONCE and he barely talked for any of it. He just kept on screaming about Henry Kissinger, like he was literally screaming. Go watch actual debates he's done, he is garbage.
    1
  6. Kyle is my favorite commentator on the left, but he is intentionally blind on certain things when it comes to Russia. He makes compelling points on some things, but he willfully ignores facts when it comes to Russia and disregards inconvenient truths and context, which is something I've only ever seen him do when it comes to Russia. I haven't been on Kyle's side of this issue ever since he began to misrepresent Bernie's position on the matter, something I thought he would never do to Bernie Sanders of all people.
    1
  7. The fact that Kyle instantly believes that a Western journalist can be assassinated by the Saudis, but there is no reason to even entertain the idea that a journalist was killed by Russians in the UK just displays his bias front and center. The same can be said for how he thinks corruption between Saudis and the Trump administration and corruption between Israel and Trump are immediate givens and clearly true, but has a serious problem coming to terms with the idea that the same could be true between the Trump administration and Russia or Russian oligarchs is also a clear bias. For a long time he did not even think Russia had hacked into the DNC and DCCC, but admitted it later when the Mueller report came out, however, he has not even entertained the notion he could be wrong about even more or that the truth is somewhere in the middle. This is just obvious bias that he has if you ask me, whereas many others keep an open mind and remain nuanced on the whole thing without jumping to conclusions like Mainstream Media has done since the beginning.
    1
  8. Where did you hear that?
    1