Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "7NEWS Australia" channel.

  1.  @barbie5342  No...you failed to, just as you have again. If I am so annoying, then why bother responding on 2 threads and still not be able to come up with a decent response?
    1
  2.  @maginot2u  You can't compare the 2 at all. Diana gave birth to a future King and was in the spotlight all the time. That was part of her problem. Meghan married Harry after his brother produced a line of heirs, thereby reducing Harry to the background. The same thing happened to Chuck's siblings when Diana ( a key member of the family ) produced heirs. Comparing Meghan to Diana does a massive disservice to Diana.
    1
  3.  @maginot2u  Their position within the organisation is not comparable. You are comparing a board member to a trainee for the janitor position. I am not saying you may treat janitors poorly, but surely you wouldn't expect the same for both.
    1
  4.  @maginot2u  Just stop trying to make a comparison. I find it hard to believe you can actually be having that much difficulty understanding the analogy.
    1
  5.  @maginot2u  I can't type any slower, so I am not sure how I can get you to keep up. Hopefully you form a better understanding of the hierarchy of the Royal family - and Meghan's lack of relevance in it - from elsewhere.
    1
  6.  @chawkz  Did you just put the word 'news' in the same sentence as 'Sky'?
    1
  7. They want to see their reaction to having this guy talking. There is not enough to judge yet.
    1
  8. It's the police's job to ensure those residents don't need to deal with the reality of a population. They need their little world cleared of anyone that doesn't fit their model. It's only fair...
    1
  9. His businesses and endeavours are always successful. Remember his airline? Oh wait... Remember his casino? Oh wait... Remember his charity? Oh wait...
    1
  10.  @hapaque  How much did you send? Remember, you have NO idea what he is worth.
    1
  11.  @fxjrulpzxi  All losing money.
    1
  12.  @susanlauper1472  The answer to that doesn't make what I have said suddenly inaccurate. Why the hurt? He doesn't care about you, why get all worked into whataboutism?
    1
  13.  @WebTrafficSecrets  You can look up all of those questions. The information is readily available. Instead, you rely on media, and then just assume it's a lie.
    1
  14.  @GlasgowCelticBhoy  I agree with 99% of that. You do NOT however, know the origin of the virus. To claim you do is just as flawed as many of the other claims in here.
    1
  15.  @zakarialamri1178  Do you know that the number of blood clots found in people given the vaccine, is LOWER than the normal rate of blood clots in a given population? ...because maths.
    1
  16. @LL 53 I am not the one making claims. I called YOUR claims bull. Prove me wrong. Prove your claim.
    1
  17.  @GlasgowCelticBhoy  There theory of a leak from the lab is something being investigated by reputable organisations. The only part that could be deemed conspiratorial is if was covered up. The other things you mention indeed fit your description, but the origins of the virus are all valid working theories, being investigated. It is a genuine theory. Attaching "conspiracy" to it is invalid. At this point all possibilities are valid theories.
    1
  18.  Seeker Truth  It's funny that you are calling me Dr, and then going on to give medical advice. You follow me around like you think your trolling is any good. ...but it is flattering all the same. You will have to remind me what triggered you so hard - because it doesn't register on my relevance meter, but it clearly did for you.
    1
  19.  Seeker Truth  I am not sure I have seen their work on pollution and emissions controls.
    1
  20. We didn't see what started it. Not enough to start the blame game.
    1
  21.  @mikemikleton8611  That tells us he was aggressive at that point in time...nothing more, nothing less. It definitely does NOT indicate how it started.
    1
  22.  Seeker Truth  No...it was logic. You seem to be confusing what I said, and somehow think it fits your script. I answered a question comparing a process, performed at different times under different circumstances. I am not sure what you are trying achieve, other than a bad troll. Stay on topic.
    1
  23.  Seeker Truth  Just because your information comes solely from media, don't make the mistake of thinking that is how normal people operate. I am not debating treatments, or cures, I answered a question about systems and procedures. As for your MSM theory...is Fox/Sky considered MSM in your world?
    1
  24.  Seeker Truth  Are they really what you consider reference material? Is that all you can think of, when you are looking for valid information? Well, at least that explains your first comment. Edit - at least you recognised the flaw in your first comment, and back peddled fast, while I was replying. You made it by seconds.
    1
  25.  Seeker Truth  So many social media, and msm cliches in your claim of being informed. The funny thing is, you actually think you were making a strong point.
    1
  26.  Seeker Truth  It is still not clear what additions your imagination made to my original point, that prompted this. Do you even know?
    1
  27.  Seeker Truth  Without adding unrelated cliches, what about my original point can you address? Don't add things so you can rant, just actually address what was written. Can you?
    1
  28.  @topsy1854  I don't care about your theory. Someone asked why the process of developing a vaccine was faster than most historical vaccines. I answered. I made no mention of any opinion on the matter, so what makes you think I am interested in an unrelated script you want to spew anywhere you can? Jog on with your bs. It is irrelevant here.
    1
  29.  Seeker Truth  You really will take any fraction of an opportunity to paste your script. Seems desperate.
    1
  30. So many prejudices in one post. We call that a hater.
    1
  31.  @joannecusaac4789  My respect isn't something you get to allocate. Who do you think you are?
    1
  32.  @crackedstar9992  Racism, police brutality, terrible health system, education...why stop there? Wait...were you were thinking I am American?
    1
  33.  @joannecusaac4789  ...and yet you showed me none. You didn't respect my opinion. You told me who I need to respect instead. Arrogant enough to tell me who I must respect. And self righteous too. ...and hypocritical. You earn respect. You don't get it by popping out in the right family, nor by trying to enforce your will.
    1
  34.  @joannecusaac4789  Again. You blasted me for something I said. That's how this started. I thought you would be smart enough to see the hypocrisy when someone pointed it out. Prove me wrong.
    1
  35. Are you accusing male teachers of something?
    1
  36.  @barbie5342  Tell me why the male teacher's employment may be compromised. This should be good.
    1
  37.  @barbie5342  In a system you describe, where guilty until proven innocent, the male teachers jobs are clearly already in danger, no matter what the students wear. That is what I call a red herring.
    1
  38.  @barbie5342  You still have failed to explain why the male teachers jobs are at risk, due to students choice in clothing. Still waiting
    1
  39.  @barbie5342  How are they a distraction for male teachers? In what way is it a problem for male teachers, and not female? Do tell. The only one that seems distracted appears to be the female principal.
    1
  40.  @barbie5342  0:37 We all heard it. It isn't an invention by anyone.
    1
  41.  @barbie5342  Now you are just making stuff up that you hope is true.
    1
  42.  Searching 4 a cure  No...even with record turn out there was still a third of the population that didn't vote at all. Your conspiracy theory doesn't account for those. Neither politician is favoured by the majority of Americans. One is just favoured by more than the other. You know...because maths.
    1
  43.  @roastytoasty8559  Really? You don't say? That's exactly why I didn't make the claim it would. What's your point?
    1