Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Inside the palace: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Oprah interview fallout continues | 7NEWS" video.

She thought she would be centre of attention. He was due to drop from the spotlight when William had heirs. Same thing happened to Charles' siblings when the boys were born. She married him too late for what she wants.
2
@maginot2u You can't compare the 2 at all. Diana gave birth to a future King and was in the spotlight all the time. That was part of her problem. Meghan married Harry after his brother produced a line of heirs, thereby reducing Harry to the background. The same thing happened to Chuck's siblings when Diana ( a key member of the family ) produced heirs. Comparing Meghan to Diana does a massive disservice to Diana.
1
@maginot2u Their position within the organisation is not comparable. You are comparing a board member to a trainee for the janitor position. I am not saying you may treat janitors poorly, but surely you wouldn't expect the same for both.
1
@maginot2u Just stop trying to make a comparison. I find it hard to believe you can actually be having that much difficulty understanding the analogy.
1
@maginot2u I can't type any slower, so I am not sure how I can get you to keep up. Hopefully you form a better understanding of the hierarchy of the Royal family - and Meghan's lack of relevance in it - from elsewhere.
1