General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
David Aspinall
Sky News Australia
comments
Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Sky News Australia" channel.
Previous
4
Next
...
All
Why?
2
@mickswagger6086 seems legit
2
They look like rough seas
2
@LincolnL-s3o Australia can feed itself...China can't.
2
@LincolnL-s3o You seem to want Australia to just roll over. That's not very Australian now is it? ...but what would you know about being Australian...really? I wonder who prefers Australia take that option...gee I wonder
2
@sidetracsteve9086 I think the farmers may even come out on top. The UN is handing out assistance money to countries to deal with a global food crisis. With China's timing, the farmers are free to look in to markets at a time when prices will be at a premium. At the very least we get to help some nations that will be grateful for assistance.
2
US corporate bot
2
Looi Sun There is a reason it is the only product you don't mess with. So obvious. It's amazing how obvious the CCP is.
2
Peace? Peace? No one believes that is a goal. Just stop.
2
One what?
2
Control freak
2
@andrewferguson3535 Have you worked out what the issue is, or is it just responding to a Pavlov bell?
2
@callanisnt That's what I was saying. ...I think you replied to the wrong comment.
2
Why not watch Fox? This is just Australia's arm of that US propaganda network.
2
Scotty took over every federal position. This guy wants control at a state level, too. Corruption in the party - fixed by more of the same..
2
@lukepetherick396 Australia was doing fine even when Mao was starving his people and building dodgy dams. We will be fine long after China destroys itself from the inside again. The more things change, the more they stay the same. Just one question. How many accounts do you have to control in a single shift?
2
@brianisme6498 Both of which are signatories on the push for an Independent Enquiry into COVID-19, started by Australia ...which is exactly why China has started trying to bully Australia, by claiming they can survive without Aussie produce and resources. We won't have China's money, but we will have lots of nice cheap steaks and plenty of coal to BBQ it with.
2
@fightlugia Why would you be pro-facism?
2
Hahahahaha!
2
It's just Fox with an Aussie accent. Murdoch propaganda
2
@palmtree1014 Meanwhile, they still crave the iron. ...it's all just bluster.
2
Was that a success for Trump?
2
Here, take a Bible and stop believing in the Rainbow Serpent. The Serpent gave some woman an apple and she gave it to her man. Such a sin. Serpent must be evil.
2
@tonytotten408 At least the pandemic didn't interfere with your supply of tinfoil
2
What does the law say about defying the election results, and illegally holding office? If I am not missing something, they are referring to the possibility if he was to lose - not just randomly walk in there and remove him. Or is that just some minor irrelevant detail?
2
Why not?
2
Do you think Sky media would not be part of it? Really...?
2
Exactly. You can't trust Bibi He has showed that repeatedly
2
@VeronicaMoreno-qd8yh Oct 7 was a result, not a beginning. You seem smart enough to recognise that much.
2
@lightnix8744 The beginning was trying to take their land. You are ignoring the cause and blaming the reaction. Typically
2
@zetokaiba5867 "you guys?" What "guys" would that be? Let's see how far off you are.
2
@ericfortin4524 You seem as confused as a toaster. Why did you go to gender assignment...is this a regular issue in your life?
2
@zetokaiba5867 Well? ...what assumptions were you making that you felt the need to tell me you aren't a Trump supporter? What in your imagination made that a relevant point in the discussion? You must have assumed something to include that. Please tell...this has to be good.
2
@dcxfadezzclipz5606 You miss the point. Trump supporters ARE the minority.
2
Same machine pushing the same agenda.
2
@JackJohnson-mc7ki The impeachments were real. History will forever record than DT was impeached twice. Setting records.
2
@rogcrater8193 Australia supplied the resources for China's growth. It was mutually beneficial. You don't need to bend over because you already gave someone what they need. Obviously wumao
2
And still managed to beat Trump. That must be embarrassing.
2
@advanceaustralia9026 Most monarchies of history have failed. The Traditional Owners way of life survived for more than 50,000 years. You appear to have very limited understanding of success.
2
@advanceaustralia9026 I was using your limited terminology. Possession is the law you follow. They had possession. If you wish to prosecute using a chosen set of definitions and laws, then you can't deny a defence of the same.
2
@advanceaustralia9026 You named one single example that is withering in scope all the time. Is that your proof it's the most successful ever? You have low standards
2
@caydcrow5161 Now you are trying too hard to distract from your ignorance. Your flailing is enough to show what you have to resort to. At least you tried. Good for you.
2
@TheGodNC I am not sure you understand the success rate of tech start ups...or Trump's bankruptcy record.
2
@joenevico7742 People matter. Bkah blah...lefty-righty divided and conquered rhetoric. Seriously, they make you pick a side and fight the other supporters, while they run the place. Wise up, puppet
2
I thought the point of government was to make appropriate changes to move forward. Why are you so against progess?
2
@FFlores-fr2ew You are responsible, if you wish to perpetuate the resilt. Wake up.
2
@FFlores-fr2ew Yes.. the nation needs to take ownership and responsibility for the results of the actions of colonisation. ...or is it only others that need to recognise their responsibilities?
2
@vanya I will type slowly... Reconciliation is good for the nation. It's not complicated.
2
@vanya The process started. Or is "oops sorry" the best you are capable of? That kind of pathetic to admit.
2
@kenreckless9845 As "Australia" in it's colonised form didn't exist before that, it seems like a weird thing to say they made it better. However, making it better for you isn't the point in question though now is it? It's not for you to say if it made the "better" for the colonised...unless you display some arrogant hubris.
2
Previous
4
Next
...
All