Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Sky News Australia" channel.

  1. Being part of a minority is really messing with your thinking.
    2
  2. I thought Bruz was in a a law suit with journalists. This weasle doesn't like genuine journalists, and tries to discredit them. Pathetic and weak.
    2
  3.  @kenparker99  You think you don't listen to fake broadcasts...while in Sky comments section. Wow! Wilful ignorance
    2
  4.  @wolfsokaya  Why is he an embarrassment? What did he do? What made Karen angry?
    2
  5. If Labour were doing this you would be criticising them. Double standard
    2
  6.  @headsortails1456  China can't produce enough food to feed themselves either. Didn't you know?
    2
  7.  @biggpicture2930  China couldn't live without buying from Australia. They tried that and many Provinces spent a large part of winter without power. They eventually bought what they needed. Your bluff got called already.
    2
  8. It's Russian planned release to make the US drop the sanctions through threats Simple.
    2
  9.  @emeraldarcher3626  Look at you 2, hunting for that reassurance that only an information silo can provide.
    2
  10. Why does a company have to provide a politician with a microphone? He can speak...they don'tchave to publish it.
    2
  11.  @carolynw3602  If one day of horror is bad, what do you call everyday since then? Hypocritical?
    2
  12. They said we hope you don't interfere when we try to invade Taiwan. They don't care about anyone other than themselves. After all, it is International politics.
    2
  13. Can we stop sending them the iron to build their war machine now?
    2
  14.  kevin kelly  Australia was doing fine long before China left the 3rd world. We were fine while Mao was killing millions, and we will be fine while the CCP does likewise.
    2
  15.  @tonysimon6312  They will stop buying eventually. Do it on Australia's terms...not theirs. Why rely on ore? Value add to the ore and ship steel. Why leave money on the table? Stick to solitaire.
    2
  16.  @tonysimon6312  Smarter ways of doing it, is currently reaching a point of development that can be scaled up. We can be at the forefront. Seems you are not up to date on emerging smelting technologies. Seems you think you got smart...and decided you didn't need to learn new things
    2
  17. ​ @elephantman2112  That little skinny official CCP spokesman said it too.
    2
  18.  @Tomei-T-90  Tell us you have no idea about Australia, without telling us you have no idea about Australia.
    2
  19.  @tianxu6611  You seem very confused about submarine power units and weapons. A submarine doesn't need to be nuclear-powered to fire nuclear warheads. Likewise, just because it is nuclear powered doesn't mean it can only fire nuked. I am amazed that this needs explaining. Hopefully, this information can save you from future public embarrassment.
    2
  20.  @tianxu6611  Why would Australia attack China? That just sounds paranoid. Australia needs long-range subs to protect its waters. Do you even comprehend how large the coastline of Australia is? Can you name any country with a longer coastline? Secondly, Australia's Collins Class already regularly transit the South China Sea. What makes you think they can't?
    2
  21.  @iggy5347  Australia was founded in 1901. The Opium Wars were long over by then. How was a nation that didn't even exist supposed to be responsible for the Opium Wars? I get that you want to spread hate, but you are relying on lies to do so.
    2
  22.  @iggy5347  Australia was not a nation in 1900 It was a British colony...like Hong Kong was.
    2
  23.  @iggy5347  Yes. Like when we fought against Japan and helped free China from its tyranny. We were definitely part of that. Is this one of the wars you are talking about?
    2
  24.  @iggy5347  Wow! You see a defence agreement between nations and go totally racist. The only people that need to worry about defence agreements are those hoping to attack.
    2
  25.  @iggy5347  Good for you. I am not up-to-date on the latest drug scene but I have not heard of any huge fentanyl problems in Australia. You just keep saying stuff you hope sounds plausible to stupid people - because you think it sounds plausible.
    2
  26.  @iggy5347  You wrongly guessed a specific drug that the US has a problem with and hoped you were right. You try so hard.
    2
  27. A genius brags that their doctor had them take a cognition test. A REAL genius thinks that's a good thing.
    2
  28.  @macabbi4  War? In Lebanon? What are you saying? Why is it that when I upset people on this topic, they just spout insults instead of addressing the point? What does that tell us?
    2
  29. I'll have what you're having
    2
  30. Defending a defender. Seems sus.
    2
  31.  @1953moe  How so? Please try to explain what you think is logical.
    2
  32.  @Fabrizio_Gambino  We can debate about the benefits of foreign financial aid, but that is very different to making other countries the scape goat for the government failings. I happen to be of the opinion that the US is be capable of giving ALL citizens a decent minimum standard of living AND assist other nations - if only the government would perform their duty honourably. Don't let them switch your focus to "others are to blame"
    2
  33. What is with all the American style left vs right bull💩 that you are trying to build? ...and the sheep are falling for it.
    1
  34. If it wasn't for this one incident Sky would have been her biggest supporter, but after this it is all over. What a shame.
    1
  35. What has the government done for my fellow Aussies? This is just deflection.
    1
  36. 0:21 What did you watch?
    1
  37.  @jimlee850  The video has the word 'tolerance' in the title. Now read the original comment and see if you can work it out. I am not one for spoon feeding you the information. I am more about thinking for yourself.
    1
  38. Care? This isn't about your feelings. Why would you ask for the government to dictate what a private company does?
    1
  39.  @jasegtree1206  Free speech is a protection for the people, not the government. That's my point. If you think I have it wrong, then I am happy to agree to disagree.
    1
  40. Of course. Your side is completely logical on everything, and anyone that has left leaning politics must be wrong. This holds true for everything without the need for critical thinking.
    1
  41.  @kumaralockwood3172  I just described both extremes...fool
    1
  42.  @danmccarron0  Omg...you actually think there are 2 different parties, with different aims. ...but please keep trying to inform me.
    1
  43.  @danmccarron0  They are both funded by the same entities that influence them in their chosen direction, irrelevant of what talking points they use to keep fools thinking they have a choice. They have just convinced you many talking points are relevant. Your reaction is typical of someone who thinks they know enough that they can now close their eyes, and act all superior. If that is what helps you sleep at night then that's fine. We can agree to disagree.
    1
  44.  @danmccarron0  At the end of it, we are not that far apart in our view. I went with a stripped down to bare bones approach, and you added the complexities - just a different approach. I would suggest that it is not only the keft that has had the talking points stretched to the extreme, but instead, both ends of the spectrum are being taken to extremes. This is a bigger worry.
    1
  45. The US won't give up their method of control. The rules never applied to the US anyway. No one questioned the UN jurisdiction in 1947, conveniently.
    1
  46.  @0x007A  You agree to the Terms of Service when you open an account.
    1
  47.  @0x007A  I see you would like their status changed...but as you know, that is not how it is right now. Instead, you want the government to dictate what they choose to publish. That is in contravention of the Right to Free Speech. Are you sure you know what you are asking for? There is nothing stopping Parlour from buying their own servers and bandwidth.
    1
  48. Support facism. Lick boots.
    1
  49. Now do the same for the war crimes David McBride uncovered, only to get prosecuted by the Australian government.
    1
  50.  @traceytaylor4132  That's rather short sighted.
    1