Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Man faces jail for ‘angering the Rainbow Serpent’ under Aboriginal heritage laws" video.

Dog whistles?
7
@Ashergbonl Yes. That is a big part of the problem, indeed. People are wising up, though - I am glad you recognise the base flaw. I am not ignoring that fact. I abhor that fact and blame it for many of the world's issues inflicted by the West. Monotheism in all its forms has caused untold damage, brutality, and suffering.
3
@kevt4805 Sit.
3
@kevt4805 I thought you were done.
3
Here, take a Bible and stop believing in the Rainbow Serpent. The Serpent gave some woman an apple and she gave it to her man. Such a sin. Serpent must be evil.
2
Sure. Now when you are asked to swear on a Bible you need to produce your invisible friend in the sky.
2
I have not seen the Christian god either. Seems hypocritical
2
@Ashergbonl But putting your hand on some book is supposed to mean something before you talk in a court. Hypocrisy
2
@AAAA-vu7fp Yes. The serpent spoke to the woman and gave her an apple that she shared with her partner, and that is why people are evil. That serpent shows up everywhere.
2
@kevt4805 Using that logic, then so did every Egyptian who saw their leader.
2
@emeraldarcher3626 Look at you 2, hunting for that reassurance that only an information silo can provide.
2
Here, take a Bible and stop believing in the Rainbow Serpent. The Serpent gave some woman an apple and she gave it to her man. Such a sin. Serpent must be evil.
1
Are you calling the Bible a historical record?
1
@petefromdownunder3734 Ummm... what? That isn't how Australia works.
1
@ShadowCatMatt89 "using English"? You use their land. What are you om about?
1
Do you swear to some god that it is true?
1
Meanwhile, they ask us to swear on the Bible. Hilarious
1
@kevt4805 Unless you stop your dog whistles, then it is not enough. It isn't your decision when I have said enough.
1
@emeraldarcher3626 Don't speak for everyone. However, those ignorant of the facts will advertise themselves.
1
@kevt4805 A large percentage of the 68% don't care about information. That number contains your target audience - the same target audience of this channel. That is why dog whistles get so many likes.
1
@emeraldarcher3626 Is your response " I know you are, but what am I?" Is that all you have? Consistent.
1
@emeraldarcher3626 I reduced your response to its essences. It was speech, not a quote. Now I have to explain grammar
1
@kevt4805 No one said that all no votes were racist. That's a strawman argument. However, the racists voted No. I mean, you generate dog whistles. It's not like you choose to hide it. Why? Are you denying it? I thought you were proud of it.
1
@kevt4805 If you are having difficulty understanding, then look up the definition of "dog whistle." It may just lead back to this post, though, as an example.
1
@kevt4805 It really isn't that complicated. I called out your dog whistle for being a dog whistle. What part are you having difficulty understanding?
1
@kevt4805 What facts? You replied on the wrong thread, didn't you? Seriously. Get it together.
1
@tysondog-original Name checks out.
1
@tysondog-original I just ain't that interesting. If that is something that you think is normal, then perhaps speak to a doctor.
1
@haydosdee3548 About what?
1