Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Parler CEO warns big tech censorship can ‘happen to anyone’" video.

  1.  @jasegtree1206  They have made everyone pick a side, and then fight amongst ourselves. Meanwhile, we are asking for them to force independent publishers to provide government officials with a platform to say and do as they please. Free speech is supposed to protect FROM the government...not FOR the government. Be careful what you wish for. ...and both sides think they have all the answers, and the other is the idiot. PLOT TWIST Both sides are idiots having been sucked into it all.
    4
  2.  @jasegtree1206  Social media only has power over you, because you give it to them. ...and that's your right too.
    3
  3. Free speech law is to protect the people from the government limiting their speech. It isn't about private enterprise being forced to publish for government officials. You have it backwards.
    3
  4. Say what you want...but why must someone else buy you the microphone? Free speech is to protect speech against the government...not that government speech must be provided a platform. You have free speech backwards.
    3
  5.  @jasegtree1206  The easiest way to erode civil liberties is to have the population ask for it. Seriously, think about it.
    2
  6.  @fightlugia  Why would you be pro-facism?
    2
  7. Care? This isn't about your feelings. Why would you ask for the government to dictate what a private company does?
    1
  8.  @jasegtree1206  Free speech is a protection for the people, not the government. That's my point. If you think I have it wrong, then I am happy to agree to disagree.
    1
  9.  @0x007A  You agree to the Terms of Service when you open an account.
    1
  10.  @0x007A  I see you would like their status changed...but as you know, that is not how it is right now. Instead, you want the government to dictate what they choose to publish. That is in contravention of the Right to Free Speech. Are you sure you know what you are asking for? There is nothing stopping Parlour from buying their own servers and bandwidth.
    1
  11.  @emblemedfate4270  So they are exercising their freedom to choose what voice they provide a platform. Lucky freedom of speech protects them from a President that thinks they must provide him a platform. They are free to say no.
    1
  12. Deleted some comments. Seems I got caught in a different argument while trying to make a simple point.
    1
  13.  @fightlugia  What part of my question led you to jump to the conclusion that I support communism and simultaneously need communism explained to me? It's possible to be against any form of authoritarianism. Relax bud.
    1
  14.  @fightlugia  The difference is that you hate a group that is against fascism. Do you get that...?
    1
  15.  @fightlugia  Seriously, being against fascism doesn't mean I am pro communism. That rant doesn't change the fact you jumped to a stupid conclusion and ran with it. No need to be embarrassed. ...did you only just realise you have been pro-facism this whole time?
    1
  16.  @oneangrycanadian6205  Oh look...claims without proof. That's new....
    1
  17.  @Pippie5555  I love the under educated.
    1