Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Asmongold TV " channel.

  1. Wrong script. This is about Palestinians. You never changed your opinion on LGBT - you are just more comfortable voicing it.
    33
  2. Nope. They can get him without taking out anyone they don't want to take out. Others will go down, but only from the music scene.
    27
  3. He can continue doing that.
    18
  4. Capitalism VS. Corporatism Two very different things.
    7
  5. We don't manage to become ancient by accident. We lost many good men along the way. ( only sort of joking...)
    7
  6. Trident's name has already gone from the lists of team members on their site. Not sure if he has been sacked or just removed from teams.
    6
  7. He is NOT banned. YT just won't give him money under certain conditions.
    6
  8.  @TheAssassinbatosai  YT refusing ad revenue based on the channels choice of sponsors is not new.
    5
  9.  @razzyrazberries    The best part is that then they wonder why no woman will talk to them.
    5
  10. He isn't banned. He can still post videos. YT just won't pay if the video is sponsored by certain companies. Don't get confused by what happened.
    4
  11.  @NeoBeelzemon  It's a business. A private company made a financial decision I never said it was political. To pretend I did is kind of bizarre when the text is still there.
    4
  12.  @NeoBeelzemon  No. It's a MONEY thing.
    3
  13.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  They are private company. They have operated this way for years. You are upset now because you like the content and sponsors.
    3
  14. Demonetised channels don't have a YT representative.
    3
  15. Exxon guy - "Intimidation is bad" Also Exxon guy - "If you don't do as you are told then you get no job"
    3
  16. ​ @CHOP874 That's not how "incel" works.
    3
  17. Commodore64 playing Summer Olympics and Winter Olympics against a mate all summer holidays is a core memory.
    3
  18. @cavalieroutdoors6036  He will be monetised if he doesn't use the wrong sponsors. This has long been the case fir YT. Your problem is that you like those sponsors.
    2
  19. Do you need a waaaahmbulance?
    2
  20.  @mdel310  So take out the problem part and repost. That is how YT works, and always has. Nothing nee here.
    2
  21.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  If they guy makes his own website and posts his own videos, will you go and watch? Is that because of some fictional boot?
    2
  22. They bought all the studios by overpaying to make them exclusive, and reliant on MS. Then killed the studios. This is endgame to the original plan to monopolise the gamer market. This is the end of the long term plan. We saw it coming at the start. This is the end.
    2
  23. This guy wants Hasan cancelled for free speech, while claiming this rubbish. Self awareness fail.
    2
  24. @Reulorics Did you feel represented by something I said?
    2
  25.  @kallew34  What? Sticking up for Palestinians?
    2
  26. They are raiding farms and deporting the pickers. Crops will die without being harvested.
    1
  27. It is only for a few he wants... not everyone
    1
  28. Omg... that's hilarious. A team of make-believe heroes
    1
  29. Who is Thanos?
    1
  30.  @guysmiley4830  save the world? He couldn't save a casino from bankruptcy. You can keep the weirdo in America.
    1
  31. Unity and Runescape both released the exact same apology template this week. SOP
    1
  32. They can still post videos. No one is stopping them from posting videos
    1
  33.  @Soubifloof  At risk - so he has freedom to make choices. What did I miss?
    1
  34.  @FloofDog44  If he does the exact same thing, then yes. Why are you pretending there is no other option but to keep doing exactly the same thing? Seriously
    1
  35. Twitter's best interest is not my best interest. Just kike all corporations. They aren't any different from the advertisers
    1
  36.  @ronaldmurphy2419  Yes, it is. Privately owned corporation. Why? Do you think it is altruism?
    1
  37. We no longer have competitive Capitalism. We now have Corporatism. They are VERY different.
    1
  38.  @youravghuman5231  Nope. I think I am stating the obvious - but many just ignore the obvious. I really didn't say anything difficult at all.
    1
  39.  @tovsteh  He can still get his videos sponsored, but YT won't also pay him. OR YT will pay him, and he finds different sponsors. You seem to misunderstand the absolute basics. It really isn't complicated. Even I can understand it.
    1
  40.  @artoriasoftheabyss1495    Did you watch my playlist, too?
    1
  41.  @artoriasoftheabyss1495  Did you view the videos?
    1
  42.  @erastal  He has freedom and options. Maybe you will visit his own site where he can make the rules. Of course, you will follow, won't you?
    1
  43.  @lucasljs1545  That is exactly how it has worked for years. Why? Didn't you know that? ... and you admit that?
    1
  44.  @thadc5937  Zinger! Look at you with the witty remarks
    1
  45.  @thadc5937  You try way too hard, bud.
    1
  46.  @MlnscBoo  How much trans content do you watch? Do you know how it gets in your feed?
    1
  47.  @MlnscBoo  Please name the channels.
    1
  48.  @thadc5937  Huh?
    1
  49.  @kiingchunk502  YT can smother whatever channels they want. He isn't entitled to be provided a platform and an audience and then dictates what he will be able to do to collect money. Being provided a revenue providing YT channels is not a right.
    1
  50.  @kiingchunk502  He can say and do what he likes, just not in YT's house.
    1