Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "YouTube f*cked up.." video.

  1. He can continue doing that.
    18
  2. He is NOT banned. YT just won't give him money under certain conditions.
    6
  3.  @TheAssassinbatosai  YT refusing ad revenue based on the channels choice of sponsors is not new.
    5
  4. He isn't banned. He can still post videos. YT just won't pay if the video is sponsored by certain companies. Don't get confused by what happened.
    4
  5.  @NeoBeelzemon  It's a business. A private company made a financial decision I never said it was political. To pretend I did is kind of bizarre when the text is still there.
    4
  6.  @NeoBeelzemon  No. It's a MONEY thing.
    3
  7.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  They are private company. They have operated this way for years. You are upset now because you like the content and sponsors.
    3
  8. Demonetised channels don't have a YT representative.
    3
  9. @cavalieroutdoors6036  He will be monetised if he doesn't use the wrong sponsors. This has long been the case fir YT. Your problem is that you like those sponsors.
    2
  10.  @mdel310  So take out the problem part and repost. That is how YT works, and always has. Nothing nee here.
    2
  11.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  If they guy makes his own website and posts his own videos, will you go and watch? Is that because of some fictional boot?
    2
  12. They can still post videos. No one is stopping them from posting videos
    1
  13.  @Soubifloof  At risk - so he has freedom to make choices. What did I miss?
    1
  14.  @FloofDog44  If he does the exact same thing, then yes. Why are you pretending there is no other option but to keep doing exactly the same thing? Seriously
    1
  15.  @youravghuman5231  Nope. I think I am stating the obvious - but many just ignore the obvious. I really didn't say anything difficult at all.
    1
  16.  @tovsteh  He can still get his videos sponsored, but YT won't also pay him. OR YT will pay him, and he finds different sponsors. You seem to misunderstand the absolute basics. It really isn't complicated. Even I can understand it.
    1
  17.  @artoriasoftheabyss1495    Did you watch my playlist, too?
    1
  18.  @artoriasoftheabyss1495  Did you view the videos?
    1
  19.  @erastal  He has freedom and options. Maybe you will visit his own site where he can make the rules. Of course, you will follow, won't you?
    1
  20.  @lucasljs1545  That is exactly how it has worked for years. Why? Didn't you know that? ... and you admit that?
    1
  21.  @thadc5937  Zinger! Look at you with the witty remarks
    1
  22.  @thadc5937  You try way too hard, bud.
    1
  23.  @MlnscBoo  How much trans content do you watch? Do you know how it gets in your feed?
    1
  24.  @MlnscBoo  Please name the channels.
    1
  25.  @thadc5937  Huh?
    1
  26.  @kiingchunk502  YT can smother whatever channels they want. He isn't entitled to be provided a platform and an audience and then dictates what he will be able to do to collect money. Being provided a revenue providing YT channels is not a right.
    1
  27.  @kiingchunk502  He can say and do what he likes, just not in YT's house.
    1
  28.  @kiingchunk502  What about it? Are we pretending that Twitter doesn't moderate content now?
    1
  29.  @kiingchunk502  What about it? Are we pretending that Twitter doesn't moderate content now?
    1
  30.  @conorstewart2214  Have you read anything? I have addressed everything you said. Not really bright, huh?
    1
  31.  @conorstewart2214  He isn't entitled to do what he wants in someone else's company and demand to be paid. That isn't a thing
    1
  32.  @carlstevenson709    Raid Shadow Legends, First Person shooter games, and VPN channels, to name a few. I guarantee he rejects sponsors that would be acceptable.
    1
  33.  @jassom1270  Correct. That is the business decision YT has made. You have described it accurately.
    1
  34.  @humbleguardsman5578    If he removes the sponsorship segment, then he can put them back up. That is how YT has always worked
    1
  35.  @marvman9791  He can use other sponsors. Having ad revenue removed based on sponsors is nothing new. Why are we pretending it is?
    1
  36.  @RomanvonUngernSternbergnrmfvus  They are a private organisation. What boot? You seem confused
    1
  37.  @Just_Pele  So remove the problem sponsors and repost. That is how YT works. Why do I need to explain the absolute basics?
    1
  38.  @marvman9791  He can use "Raid Shadow Legends", absolutely, and any number of VPN companies. He can do KEEPS. There are generic sponsors. Why? Couldn't you think of the obvious ones?
    1
  39.  @marvman9791  He can build his own site, now that he has gained an audience. There is nothing censoring him. Just a company choosing what it wants to do.
    1
  40.  @marvman9791  It is not YT's responsibility to provide him a platform, an audience, and an income. That's called socialism.
    1
  41.  @dave4148  Yes. So, use different sponsors. Then, remove the sponsors from previous videos and repost. He needs to do a little editing to continue getting more money from them. He has options.
    1
  42.  @dave4148  Being subject to corporate overlords is just part of being a content creator. You just need to choose which overlords service you wish to use.
    1
  43.  @Red-uf4hr  Why do you know how to locate such content? Do you search for it often? Do you know how things appear in your feed? That's on you.
    1
  44.  @Red-uf4hr  Working out great for America. Why do you refuse to compare to civilised nations?
    1
  45.  @Red-uf4hr  Many nations have right-wing governments but don't have the same problems the US does. Why?
    1
  46.  @MrMoustaffa  You genuinely think that you are correcting something. Sure thing.
    1
  47.  @FirstLast-dh8ks  Who said what? You need to be specific.
    1
  48.  @totalmetaljacket789  YT only has the power you let it have. That's on you.
    1
  49.  @totalmetaljacket789  That was quick. Most try some other ridiculous talking points that mean nothing before resorting to weak insults. I guess you were smarter than most here. You realised fast that your point makes no sense. Good for you.
    1
  50. He is NOT banned. YT just won't give him money under certain circumstances. How is that a new thing?
    1
  51. YouTube is NOT only governed by US law. It is subject to laws of all countries it operates in. US exceptionalism doesn't work for global companies.
    1
  52.  @vampuricknight1  No. They said you can have YT revenue and sponsorship money, but not with certain sponsorship. That is nothing new.
    1
  53.  @vampuricknight1  They are not government agencies, correct. That is why they are allowed to dictate their own business practices
    1