Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Danger of Labour supermajority is ‘nonsense’" video.

  1. It was not a probkem for them when Boris or Maggie had huge majorities. Hypocrisy It is only bad when the majority isn't their own.
    27
  2.  @JD-Media  What is this thing you are calling a super majority? It is an American term that has no relevance in Britain
    6
  3. A majority is only an issue when it isn't theirs.
    6
  4.  @JD-Media  What difference does it make in the UK? I will type slowly so you can keep up... N O N E In the US, it means Congress has enough to overrule the President's vito, which requires not just a majority but a super majority. It actually means something there.
    3
  5.  @JD-Media  What difference does it make in the UK? I will type slowly so you can keep up... N O N E In the US, it means Congress has enough to iver rule the President, which requires not just a majority, but a super majority. It actually means something.
    3
  6.  @JD-Media  What would 434 seats achieve that 433 can't? Anything?
    2
  7. He will say the chosen narrative and rhetoric for them.
    2