General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
David Aspinall
WION
comments
Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "United Kingdom: China breaching legal deal over Hong Kong governance | Latest World English News" video.
@DineshTwanabasu How many things will UK's historical crimes absolve people of? What is the limit of things you can excuse by pointing at someone else and saying that they did horrible things too?
3
@DineshTwanabasu China signed up to certain responsibilities. At least show enough self respect to honour your own word. If your word is worthless, you have nothing.
2
@mao 420 Pointing at someone else's crime doesn't absolve you of yours. It just looks like you are admitting you know your word is worthless, and try to justify it.
2
@DineshTwanabasu Really? You don't know of any treaties that sustain the global economy? At least pretend you will honour your word. Then again, it is just you pointing at someone else's crimes as if that absolves yours. Pathetic.
1
@anaishakumar341 Why all the hate for other countries? Why be a hater? It will make you old too fast.
1
@DineshTwanabasu Still just pointing at others to justify what you know to be wrong...or you wouldn't bother with justification. It doesn't matter what country you try to include in your hate filled rant, it doesn't justify what you know to be wrong. At least you realise it is wrong. When your country matures, there may yet be hope.
1
Dirigo Diaboli The agreement of HK is readily available online...for those of us with full access to the internet. Anyone can read the part about HK autonomy guarantees. Can you not access these types of things? You seem to think all this information isn't at everyone's fingertips. All sorts of valid International treaties are available to view. That's how the world works.
1
@DineshTwanabasu Well, China chose not to honour their own word. The CCP word is worth less than gum on a shoe. ...and you just try to justify it
1
@mao 420 My government? Who have you assumed that is?
1