Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "James O'Brien responds to Daily Mail being 'furious' over comedian mocking Liz Truss on TV" video.

@Tom There is a lot necessary after tge last 12 years
4
@Tom All of a sudden you are all out of opinions. Surprise!
3
@Tom No one claimed it was all caused in the 12 years. We call that gaslighting. How long do they need to actually do something then, if 12 years isn't enough?
2
@Tom I am not denying anything. More gaslighting.
2
@Tom It's all there...read
2
@Tom Sure...but what about the last 12. You just totally ignored them AGAIN. It's borderline delusional
1
@Tom I asked about the last 12 years. He deflected. There are blind people coming out of 6 months of dark winter that saw that deflection...how did you miss it? Intentionally perhaps...? ...or did you just totally miss it altogether?
1
@Tom Did you miss the question at the end? How long do they need?
1
@Tom Reduce population? What are you talking about? We never mentioned population, and why would we...that's a pointless discussion these days. This isn't the 1950s
1
@Tom Now, the question you avoided... After 12 years, how many more do they need to finally achieve something?
1
@Tom No...you were having that discussion with someone else. It is you that is failing to follow. I had the question ...if 12 years wasn't enough, then how long do they need?
1
@Tom Don't misunderstand my refusal to acknowledge that arguing population control is even a legitimate answer to anything, with you understanding something no one else can comprehend. See Dunning-Kruger. It's a dog whistle, or just displays complete ignorance...possibly both. It has to be one of those at least one. Unless you are offering to lead by example and do your bit for population reduction.
1
@Tom Are you ever going to answer the question? If 12 years wasn't enough, and they were competent, then how much linger do they need? Pick a number
1