Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Damon Hill discusses whether Max Verstappen should have been given a penalty in the Sao Paulo GP" video.

I take your word about F1 driving over Damon Hill anytime...what would he know? You are far more qualified on this, than this bloke. The guy in the video must be so arrogant to disagree with you.
9
He was in front at the time...he gained no advantage.
5
What rule?
4
@icemankail197 Wrong. Max lifted off the brake putting his nose in front at the critical point. Therefore, he had front position at the apex. Let's at least remain honest with the facts here.
4
@simonball6560 That was a racing incident where both went off track.
2
@benfulford3943 ...except Lewis was behind at the point the rules apply.
2
@vadwvea7153 At the apex - the part the rules deal with - Max was in front. It's not about trying to find a way to add penalties when you WANT to. Be objective.
2
@icemankail197 Of course he hit the apex...just not perfectly. To say he didn't make the apex, when we know he went around the corner, tells us you don't know the meaning of the word 'apex'
2
@grumpyone5963 Just because you are a Lewis fanboy doesn't automatically make anyone that agrees with the official ruling a Max fanboy. That's a limited view you have of the world, and need to get out of your circle jerk...fast. Some of us just like F1...maybe with a blind hope and bias that the Honey Badger suits next years car better. You Lewis cling ons are another level entirely.
2
@icemankail197 Even a wide turn has an apex. Why do I even need to explain that?
2
@davidjames3080 If being majority to blame for slamming g someone in to a wall at high speed is 10 seconds, then no touching running wide seems like a racing incident if using the same scale. At the point of the corner considerd the apex, Max was in front, so there was no advantage gained. I see why you have experience describing what a blind man can see.
2
@darrenwalters6339 So yes, Max was in front at the Apex plus blah blah blah
1
@Creative Drone Works If you want to claim that Max came off the brake early, you also need to accept that it put his nose in front...because physics. Even Drivers61 showed a still clip explaining exactly that in his analysis. I will take his word over yours.
1
@Creative Drone Works Yes. .drivers can take a corner more than one way. A key variable is traffic. To select 1 specific instance of cornering and claiming you have representative data was too laughable to address, so I didn't bother.
1
@Creative Drone Works You never use a single point of data and extrapolate. If you don't have more than 1 lap as your basis of comparison, then you will never satisfy any objective observers that you aren't being selective in your choice of data point. TL/DR You can't cherry pick 1 single piece of unrelated data as evidence.
1
@darrenwalters6339 Apparently, it is a racing incident, as much as you don't want it to be.
1
@SLOPPY1001 Racing incident
1
@darrenwalters6339 Assumes facts not in evidence.
1
@poolfans Apparently not. What you describe sounds more like Silverstone.
1
@poolfans You are wrong. I looked it up and it was no penalty and no review.
1
@chrisbarker5336 Turns out I was right...and all you fan girls that can't accept reality are still whining little children, that can't deal. Move on. You fan girls lost.
1
@janickpauwels3792 My hero? He totally flashed past the key point that Max put his nose in front...he too is a Lewis fan. He too was wrong. It's not a penalty. You seem upset that it wasn't and isn't a penalty I hope you can accept it and move on with your life. You shouldn't let it bother you this much. For the sake if your health...move on.
1
@probtw4205 Anyonr can use someone else's arguments against them, when they are so obviously wrong. Thanks for providing a working example.
1
@probtw4205 Wtf are you talking about? I would use your argument against you, but it's just a jumble of angry over inflated self confidence. Fo you have a point? What are you doing? What are you trying to achieve?
1
@probtw4205 What's your point? Other than a self indulgent ego stroke, based on some weak attempt to abuse some random on the internt..I am not not sure what your point is. The funniest part is that the topic has been reviewed already. Do you know the result? Do you reakise
1
@probtw4205 I DR a single one of your TLs...because TL/DR. Do you even know what your point is? Do you have one? I thought you would have got your false sense of superiority well stroked from at least one of your rants by now. Seems you crave more strokes than that. Maybe change hands.
1
@probtw4205 So you came to argue with a random, just so you can say you won... ...but you picked a thread where time has already proved me to be correct.
1
@probtw4205 I made one point. My point held up Your pedantry is irrelevant...other than being hilarious.
1
@robertphillips3078 That is a completely objective, totally rational unemotional response.
1
@robertphillips3078 Thanks for detailing you hidden bias. It was very honest, given how you don't let it cloud your judgement at all.
1
@TheBrass18 That applies to both drivers. Neither made the corner, both went off track.
1
@TheBrass18 No contact though. You appear to be describing Silverstone.
1
@TheBrass18 Do you know if this was given a final ruling or is it still open for debate? Asking for a friend.
1
@TheBrass18 Hopefully they make a final decision soon then.
1
@TheBrass18 So if I just had a bit more knowledge, then I would agree with you. Wow...Nice.
1
@TheBrass18 If you read what the official finding was, according to tge professionals that perform the job, rather than someone pandering to an audience, then the answer is different to the one you want it to be. The reviews happened. You were wrong.
1
@TheBrass18 Maybe, if you got a little bit more knowledge, you wouldn't have made such an obvious error. Next time...learn a bit more.
1
@TheBrass18 At least you are self aware. That's a start
1