Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. For what crimes or misdemeanours? I'll wait. Incoming abuse, with not a single crime listed in 3, 2, 1...
    8
  2. She wants to force her religion on people and is targeting the most vulnerable. She wants the law to help. Sociopathic
    8
  3. It isn't optional to give an answer.
    7
  4. An eye for an eye just results in the world going blind.
    6
  5. They already have the records...of course. ..but to use them clearly didn't help their case.
    5
  6. They should have seconded his motion and then it was him that called for impeachment. Why didn't that happen?
    4
  7. He thinks we are all stupid.
    4
  8. Why didn't they move in his motion and make him the one that called for impeachment? Would that have been funny? Why didn't they use it?
    3
  9. 1A doesn't require a business to give you an audience and microphone. Refusing to provide an audience and microphone isn't stopping your free speech.
    3
  10. And cried over the atrocities in Bucha, Ukraine
    2
  11.  @chrisowens9977  I will take that bet genius. I have never heard of a corpse hitting a jumper. If both are blind, I bet MJ still hits more baskets than Pippen - because vision isn't the only differentiator. Funny enough, you yourself showed vision isn't the only differentiator - and didn't even realise.
    2
  12.  @davidradovsky7405  Cattle rustling. Your turn. Name one he did.
    2
  13.  @barryschwarz  Responding to the judge is not optional. Refusal gets charged with contempt and comes with jail time.
    2
  14. I see the English language is troublesome for you.
    2
  15. They listened to his answers... but they put them together rather than in isolation. That is when the hypocrisy becomes laughably apparent.
    2
  16. Why does the US need Russia's and China's permission to deal with Israel? Seriously
    2
  17. Oddly specific
    2
  18. So this guy has doubts that the US can achieve goals the US sets for itself. Remember that.
    1
  19. Priorities. American people are irrelevant to these petty antics between parties.
    1
  20.  @chrisowens9977  Not all blind people are the same. Are all people with 20/20 vision on an even playing field?
    1
  21.  @chrisowens9977  You strike me as the type of person to take that bet.
    1
  22.  @chrisowens9977  That is an oddly specific situation you have limited life to in order to try to win an internet argument. You took a swing, but after 3 strikes, you should probably just head back to the bench.
    1
  23.  @chrisowens9977  You are flailing now
    1
  24. Not a bug... it is a feature
    1
  25. They want government funded healthcare for the ruling members ONLY.
    1
  26. The real question is why did big businesses invest in a company that doesn't even have a financial report. Look bigger...they want to to only focus on FTX. It's bigger than that.
    1
  27. Does Blinkin think he is so much more clever than everyone, or does he just think we are all morons? Evil personified.
    1
  28. "This IS an investigation. Is your private investigation more important than government oversight? Which takes priority?"
    1
  29. Perhaps check with his kids first.
    1
  30. Can I force Fox News to publish my message under 1A, then?
    1
  31. Short sighted. The alternative is to hand it to billionaires. Stockholm Syndrome in effect.
    1
  32. They want to FORCE people to accept a religious lecture if they are homeless. Christo-facism Why is the judge not addressing the obvious?
    1
  33. They suddenly need China's and Russia's permission to deal with Israel - conveniently.
    1
  34. Oh no. A CEO made a business decision. Enact fascism NOW!
    1
  35. Challenging is legal. That process has finished. You can't actually be so stupid that you don't know the difference. Prove me wrong.
    1
  36.  @barryschwarz  Stating that as a response IS providing the answer to the demanded question. If that is the truthful answer to the question demanded, then they have indeed responded to the demand. It really isn't that complicated.
    1
  37.  @barryschwarz  It is technically correct - the best kind of correct. I get it. You want it worded differently, which could also be deemed accurate, but that doesn't make it less accurate.
    1
  38.  @barryschwarz  The only outrage is from you being upset with the technically accurate wording. Control yourself.
    1
  39.  @barryschwarz  You brought up outrage, not me. What are you talking about?
    1
  40. Transparency ... with limits and censorship
    1
  41. We have known how much of a joke the US is for long time now. What makes you think anyone needs new evidence?
    1
  42. These mouthpieces just can't accept that people aren't buying their ludicrous narrative - but continue trying anyway, expecting a different outcome.
    1
  43. ​ @user-zu5do6ri6r  Do you seriously think you have more might than the US government?
    1
  44. Did he just hope this behaviour is repeated in the future? Seriously? I get the anger, but that is messed up.
    1
  45. Treason? That's not how treason works anywhere, but especially in the US. See the Constitution
    1
  46. You didn't? Really? How can you not realise that a judge is required to operate impartially according to law, and not according to politics? I wouldn't advertise that you don't know that.
    1
  47.  @kelvyiturralde8111  You must be new to debate. You opened with not knowing what the rules are...now you are switching to talk about those that don't follow the rule. I didn't claim all judges follow the rule perfectly, just pointed out that the rule exists...and any fool should know that.
    1
  48.  @kelvyiturralde8111  Did you pay attention in class? If they didn't explain that there are rules about judges being impartial, I think you need to ask for your money back. Your edit after the fact just tells us you recognise your original post was totally inaccurate.
    1
  49. It took 10 years to put someone on the moon. 60 years later, and you can't be sure you can provide enough electricity to homes even if set as a national goal. That's a very big decline in ability. Are you sure America is incapable of achieving reliable electricity supply? Edit spelling
    1